Case law

Scarino v. Saif Corp.

91 Or. App. 350 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 1, 1988

The Board concluded that it should. We reverse. … SAIF relies on SAIF v.

Rogue Advocates v. Jackson County

282 Or. App. 381 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 23, 2016

Jenkins v. Board of Parole, 356 Or 186, 214 , 335 P3d 828 (2014) (the requirement of substantial reason inheres in the substantial evidence standard of review). … See Younger v.

Wy'East Education Ass'n v. Oregon Trail School District No. 46

244 Or. App. 194 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 13, 2011

AFSCME Local 88 v. … See OPEU and Termine v.

Casteel v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

55 Or. App. 474 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 6, 1982

Hill v. SAIF, 38 Or App 13 , 588 P2d 1287 (1979); Lohr v. SAIF, 48 Or App 979 , 618 P2d 468 (1980). … ORS 656.214(5); Smith v. SAIF, 51 Or App 833, 836 , 627 P2d 495 (1981); *479 Harris v. SAIF, 55 Or App 158 , 637 P2d 1292 (1981.)

State v. Maney

244 Or. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 29, 2011

State v. Thompson, 328 Or 248 , 971 P2d 879 , cert den, 527 US 1042 (1999). … Martini v. Beaverton Ins. Agency, Inc., 314 Or 200, 211 , 838 P2d 1061 (1992).

State v. Bass

76 Or. App. 396 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 14, 1985

State v. Brown, 297 Or 404 , 687 P2d 751 (1984). Affirmed.

Cascade Steel Rolling Mills, Inc. v. Employment Division

26 Or. App. 863 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 20, 1976

Gredvig v. Employment Div., 24 Or App 511 , 546 P2d 791 (1976). … The Board might reasonably have concluded that if there were job openings for crane operators, the claimant would have heard of them through his contract with the labor union. See, Guidice v.

Gier's Liquor & Sporting Goods, Inc. v. Ass'n of Unit Owners of Driftwood Shores Surfside Inn Condominium

124 Or. App. 365 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 3, 1993

The board is authorized to incur debts that may exceed $2,000 if more than 50 percent of the voting owners concur. The board may mortgage the assets of defendant in doing so. … Com. et al. v. Kendrick et al., 227 Or 608 , 363 P2d *372 1078 (1961); Mt. Shadow Homes v. Gray, 61 Or App 230, 233 , 656 P2d 383 , rev den 295 Or 31 (1983). There is evidence here that the award was reasonable.

Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Farrow

122 Or. App. 164 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 4, 1993

The Board affirmed and adopted the referee’s order. On review, employer does not contest the Board’s findings. … Perry v. SAIF, 307 Or 654 , 772 P2d 418 (1989); Smith v. SAIF, 302 Or 396 , 730 P2d 30 (1986).

Ds Waters of America, Lp v. Prabucki

240 Or. App. 384 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 12, 2011

DS WATERS OF AMERICA, LP, Petitioner, v. Robert PRABUCKI, Respondent. 0801518; A143117. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted September 14, 2010. Decided January 12, 2011. Benjamin C. … See OAR XXX-XXX-XXXX; SAIF v. Kollias, 233 Or.App. 499 , 227 P.3d 188 (2010). Claimant objected to the admission of the report, and the ALJ excluded it.

Trojan Concrete v. Tallant

107 Or. App. 429 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 29, 1991

Drews v. EBI Companies, 310 Or 134, 150 , 795 P2d 531 (1990). SAIF had previously accepted the claim. … Clark v. Linn, 98 Or App 393 , 779 P2d 203 (1989).

Estacada Rural Fire District 69 v. Hull

256 Or. App. 729 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 22, 2013

See City of Eugene v. … SAIF v. Falconer, 154 Or App 511, 521 , 963 P2d 50 (1998), rev den, 328 Or 330 (1999) (De Muniz, J., dissenting); accord Severy v. Board of Parole, 318 Or 172, 178 , 864 P2d 368 (1993).

Schlichting v. Bergstrom

13 Or. App. 562 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 27, 1973

See also, Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 US 564 , 92 S Ct 2701 , 33 L Ed 2d 548 (1972); Perry v. Sindermann, 408 US 593 , 92 S Ct 2694 , 33 L Ed 2d 570 (1972). … Board of Regents v. Roth, supra; Papadopoulos v. Bd. of Higher Ed., supra.

Long v. Argonaut Insurance

169 Or. App. 625 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 13, 2000

On review, claimant argues that, under our decision in SAIF v. … Employer also argues that our reading of the Division’s rules conflicts with Freres Lumber Co. v. Jegglie, 106 Or App 27 , 806 P2d 164 (1991).

Matthies v. Tillamook County Creamery Ass'n

101 Or. App. 44 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 21, 1990

ORS 656.214(5); Suratt v. Gunderson Bros., 259 Or 65, 76-78 [, 485 P2d 410 ] (1971); and Jacobs v. Louisiana Pacific, 59 Or App 1, 3 [, 650 P2d 154 ] (1982). … The Board must give a reasoned explanation of why the facts that it found lead to its conclusion that claimant is entitled to a 15 percent permanent partial disability award. Armstrong v.

Brecht v. State Accident Insurance Fund

12 Or. App. 615 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 2, 1973

Brooksby * * * ought to have been considered by the Board in making its determination.” … Wilson v. Gilchrist Timber Co., 6 Or App 104 , 487 P2d 104 (1971).

State v. Amini

154 Or. App. 589 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 24, 1998

In State v. … In State v.

Bruce v. SAIF Corp.

149 Or. App. 190 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 9, 1997

In Welch v. … Because we cannot tell if the Board applied the correct legal principle, we remand to the Board to clarify and, if necessary, to revise its conclusions. See Tilden v.

Dunn v. SAIF Corp.

88 Or. App. 291 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 12, 1987

In February 1986, the Board received an affidavit from claimant’s attorney, stating that a request had been mailed by regular mail to the Board on September 6,1985, within the statutory time limit. … We held in Weyerhaeuser Company v.

Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Warren

103 Or. App. 275 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 5, 1990

(Emphasis in Board’s.) Employer contends, essentially, that the Board had no choice but to accept Nathan’s opinion that claimant’s underlying condition is ideopathic and has not been affected by her employment. … See Weller v. Union Carbide Corp., 288 Or 27 , 602 P2d 259 (1979).