Case law

Daywalt v. Bertrand

10 Or. App. 418 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 25, 1972

Taylor v. U. S. National Bank, 248 Or 538 , 436 P2d 256 , 30 ALR3d 849 (1968); Moore v. Schermerhom, 210 Or 23 , 307 P2d 483 , 308 P2d 180 , 65 ALR2d 715 (1957); Brown, Adm’r v. … Brown, Adm’r v.

State v. Ward

37 Or. App. 591 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 18, 1978

In fact the majority, which decries "bootstrapping” (slip opinion at 5), uses the very language quoted above in an attempt to "bootstrap” its way under the rhubric of Brown v. … Brown v. Illinois, supra, 422 US at 605 . 1 As I understand State v.

State v. Ross

196 Or. App. 420 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 8, 2004

See State v. … See Ailes v.

Tupper v. Fairview Hospital & Training Center

22 Or. App. 523 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 22, 1975

The United States Supreme Court held in Board of Regents v. … Board of Regents of Univ. & St. Col. of Ariz., 510 F2d 1324 (9th Cir 1975); Geneva Towers Tenants Org. v. Federated Mortgage Inv., 504 F2d 483 (9th Cir 1974); and Ring v.

State v. Manoff

295 Or. App. 566 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 3, 2019

State v. Smith , 274 Or. App. 562 , 568, 363 P.3d 514 (2015), rev. den. , 358 Or. 551 , 368 P.3d 26 (2016) (citing State v. Wheeler , 268 Or. App. 729 , 732, 344 P.3d 57 (2015) ). … (citing State v. Brown , 310 Or. 347 , 355, 800 P.2d 259 (1990) ) (describing requirements for plain-error review under *805 ORAP 5.45(1) ). The court did not plainly err when it imposed the fines. Affirmed.

Granner v. Fairview Center

147 Or. App. 406 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 16, 1997

The Board disagreed, 2 stating: “Although Dr. … Georgia-Pacific v. Piwowar, 305 Or 494, 501 , 753 P2d *410 948 (1988) (citing Bauman v. SAIF, 295 Or 788, 794 , 670 P2d 1027 (1983)).

Stanley Smith Security v. Pace

118 Or. App. 602 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 17, 1993

In Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. … In Jones v.

State v. Kragt

304 Or. App. 537 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 3, 2020

As defendant acknowledges, that is a contention we previously rejected in Norris v. Board of Parole, 237 Or App 1, 238 P3d 994 (2010), rev den, 350 Or 130 (2011), and Delavega v. … Board of Parole, 222 Or App 161, 194 P3d 159 (2008), and we are not per- suaded that we should overrule that line of authority.

Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Sheldon

86 Or. App. 46 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 24, 1987

Thus, the Board has authority to authorize offsets, Forney v. … Attorney fees payable out of the award are part of a claimant’s compensation, SAIF v.

Nelson v. EBI Companies

64 Or. App. 16 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 27, 1983

Brecht *21 v. SAIF, 12 Or App 615 (1973); Wilson v. Gilchrist Lumber Co., 6 Or App 104 (1971).” … In Clemons v.

Smith v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

51 Or. App. 833 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 27, 1981

Audas v. SAIF, 43 Or App 813, 816 , 604 P2d 428 (1979); Potter v. SAIF, 41 Or App 755, 757, 761 , 598 P2d 1290 , rev den 288 Or 81 (1979). … While we generally defer to the Board’s presumed expertise in assessing the extent of disability, we do so on de novo review as an exercise of our "independent critical judgment.” Owens v.

Brecht v. State Accident Insurance Fund

12 Or. App. 615 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 2, 1973

Brooksby * * * ought to have been considered by the Board in making its determination.” … Wilson v. Gilchrist Timber Co., 6 Or App 104 , 487 P2d 104 (1971).

Lane County School District 4J v. Oregon School Activities Ass'n

212 Or. App. 373 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 2, 2007

Liberty v. State of Oregon, 200 Or App 607, 613 (2005); see also Walter v. Scherzinger, 339 Or 408, 423-24 (2005) (giving ‘service’ its plain meaning); Keller v. Armstrong Industries, Inc., 197 Or App 450 (2005). … PGE v. Bureau of Labor and Industries, 317 Or 606, 611 , 859 P2d 1143 (1993).

Ds Waters of America, Lp v. Prabucki

240 Or. App. 384 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 12, 2011

DS WATERS OF AMERICA, LP, Petitioner, v. Robert PRABUCKI, Respondent. 0801518; A143117. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted September 14, 2010. Decided January 12, 2011. Benjamin C. … See OAR XXX-XXX-XXXX; SAIF v. Kollias, 233 Or.App. 499 , 227 P.3d 188 (2010). Claimant objected to the admission of the report, and the ALJ excluded it.

PORTLAND POLICE ASS'N v. City of Portland

248 Or. App. 109 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 8, 2012

Assn. v. Arlington Sch. Dist. No. 3, 196 Or App 586, 595 , 103 P3d 1138 (2004) (citations omitted). … Cassidy v. Pavlonnis, 227 Or App 259, 264 , 205 P3d 58 (2009). The parties signed the CBA in this case in 2006, long after we issued our 2002 decision in PFFA.

Amlin v. Edward Hines Lumber Co.

35 Or. App. 691 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 8, 1978

Wait v. … Reynolds Metals v. Tax Corn., 245 Or 156 , 421 P2d 379 (1966). There is no such intention expressed in ORS 656.273.

Wick v. State Accident Insurance Fund

37 Or. App. 285 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 4, 1978

Claimant appeals from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) affirming the denial by the hearing referee of his claim for worker’s compensation on account of a heart condition. … The Workers’ Compensation Board affirmed the referee’s order on April 14, 1978. 2 A conclusive presumption is actually a rule of law, and thus cannot be controverted. State v. Elliott, 234 Or 522 , 383 P2d 382 (1963).

Robinson v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

69 Or. App. 534 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 29, 1984

See Inkley v. Forest Fiber Products Co., supra, 288 Or at 348 ; Satterfield v. Compensation Dept. 1 Or App 524, 465 P2d 239 (1970). … See Satterfield v. Compensation Dept., supra, 1 Or App at 528 .

SAIF Corp. v. Valencia

148 Or. App. 263 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 28, 1997

On review of an order of the Board, we are not to substitute our judgment for that of the Board as to any issue of fact or to set aside any finding that is supported by substantial evidence. Garcia v. … Boise Cascade Corp., 309 Or 292,295 , 787 P2d 884 (1990); Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200, 206 , 752 P2d 312 (1988). Claimant’s attorney posed two questions to Rand.

McMillan v. Follansbee

194 Or. App. 145 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 8, 2004

Sphier, 129 Or 413, 418 , 272 P 902 (1928) (quoting 20 Ruling Case Law 716); see Brogoitti et ux v. Brown et ux, 231 Or 309, 313 , 372 P2d 773 (1962). … See Bennett v. Farmers Ins. Co., 332 Or 138 , 26 P3d 785 (2001); Coast Range Conifers v. Board of Forestry, 189 Or App 531 , 76 P2d 1148 (2003), rev allowed, 337 Or 476 (2004).