Case law

Publishers Paper Co. v. Morgan

10 Or. App. 94 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 23, 1972

The majority view is well expressed in Campbell Soup Co. v. Div. of Employment Security, 13 NJ 431, 100 A2d 287 (1953), where the court, speaking through Justice William B. … Krauss v. A. & M. Karagheusian, Inc., 13 N.J. 447 [ 100 A2d 277 ] (1953).

Karl v. Construction Equipment Co.

132 Or. App. 293 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 4, 1995

The Board awarded claimant an additional attorney fee under ORS 656.386(1) for having prevailed on the question of the compensability of medical treatment. On reconsideration, and relying on our opinion in SAIF v. … Allen, 124 Or App 183 , 861 P2d 1018 (1993), the Board withdrew the award of attorney fees, reasoning that the dispute concerned only the payment of medical bills related to a compensable claim. In the light of SAIF v.

Liberty Northwest Insurance v. Cross

109 Or. App. 109 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 2, 1991

Blakely v. SAIF, 89 Or App 653 , 750 P2d 528 , rev den 305 Or 672 (1988). The Board’s finding on predisposition was irrelevant to that test and may be disregarded. See Preston v. … We review only the Board’s order. ORS 656.298(6); ORS 183.482(8). Although the Board affirmed and adopted the referee’s order, it also made its own independent analysis, which replaced the referee’s analysis.

Keene v. Creswell School District No. 40

56 Or. App. 801 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 12, 1982

As we pointed out in Ross v. Springfield School Dist. No. 19, supra: “* * * ORS 342.895 vests in the district school board the authority to dismiss a permanent teacher on the grounds set forth in ORS 342.865. … As pointed out in the body of the opinion, and in Ross v. Springfield School Dist.

Stacy v. Corrections Division

131 Or. App. 610 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 14, 1994

Claimant argues, relying on Meyers v. … Meyers v. Darigold, Inc., supra, does not so hold. The Board found here that claimant established a worsening as of December 5, 1991. Substantial evidence supports that finding.

Daywalt v. Bertrand

10 Or. App. 418 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 25, 1972

Taylor v. U. S. National Bank, 248 Or 538 , 436 P2d 256 , 30 ALR3d 849 (1968); Moore v. Schermerhom, 210 Or 23 , 307 P2d 483 , 308 P2d 180 , 65 ALR2d 715 (1957); Brown, Adm’r v. … Brown, Adm’r v.

Colwell v. Trotman

47 Or. App. 855 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 18, 1980

We agree with claimant, and we therefore reverse the Board’s order and remand the matter to the Board to award appropriate compensation. The last injurious exposure rule, which we adopted in Mathis v. … More recently, we stated in Holden v.

Davis v. Jefferson County

239 Or. App. 564 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 15, 2010

See Union Oil Co. v. Board of Co. Comm. of Clack. … Younger v.

Bohrer v. Weyerhaeuser Co.

93 Or. App. 751 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 9, 1988

In Teel v. … On de novo review, the Board may make such disposition of the case as it determines to be appropriate. Neely v. SAIF, 43 Or App 319 , 602 P2d 1101 (1979), rev den 288 Or 493 (1980). This is in contrast to Travis v.

Gosda v. J.B. Hunt Transportation

155 Or. App. 120 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 15, 1998

First, after the Board issued its decision in this case, we reversed the Board in Garibay v. Barrett Business Services, 148 Or App 496 , 941 P2d 1036 (1997). … See Inkley v.

Veselik v. SAIF Corp.

177 Or. App. 280 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 17, 2001

See Joseph Baggett v. The Boeing Company, 150 Or App 269 [, 945 P2d 663 ] (1997). … Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. State of Oregon, 331 Or 634 , 643-44 n 5, 20 P3d 180 (2001); Marvin Wood Products v. Callow, 171 Or App 175, 184 , 14 P3d 686 (2000).

Murphy Citizens Advisory Committee v. Josephine County

123 Or. App. 539 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 6, 1993

In Edney v. … See also Bigej Enterprises v. Tillamook County, 118 Or App 342 , 847 P2d 869 , rev den 317 Or 162 (1993); Simon v. Board of Co. Comm. of Marion Co., 91 Or App 487 , 755 P2d 741 (1988).

Gage v. Fred Meyer Stores - Kroger Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 6, 2023

ORS 183.482(8)(a), (c); SAIF v. … See State v.

Power Master, Inc. v. Blanchard

103 Or. App. 467 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 26, 1990

, consider the most analogous is Kolar v. … We reiterated in Hobson v.

Nelson v. EBI Companies

64 Or. App. 16 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 27, 1983

Brecht *21 v. SAIF, 12 Or App 615 (1973); Wilson v. Gilchrist Lumber Co., 6 Or App 104 (1971).” … In Clemons v.

Ledbury v. Montgomery Ward & Co.

99 Or. App. 631 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 13, 1989

All that is required is that, if the Board reverses a referee’s finding on credibility, it “state precisely what it found to be the facts and * * * explain how those facts [led] to its conclusion.” See Lewis v. … There is substantial evidence in the record to support those findings, and the Board’s reasoning from them to *635 its conclusion is not irrational or unsound. See Armstrong v.

Central Oregon LandWatch v. Deschutes Cty. (A183568)

Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 12, 2024

Sols. v. … See Flying J, Inc. v.

Vasquez v. SAIF Corp.

237 Or. App. 59 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 1, 2010

Albany General Hospital v. … Claimant contends that, notwithstanding that factual difference, our more recent decision in Fred Meyer, Inc. v.

PORTLAND POLICE ASS'N v. City of Portland

248 Or. App. 109 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 8, 2012

Assn. v. Arlington Sch. Dist. No. 3, 196 Or App 586, 595 , 103 P3d 1138 (2004) (citations omitted). … Cassidy v. Pavlonnis, 227 Or App 259, 264 , 205 P3d 58 (2009). The parties signed the CBA in this case in 2006, long after we issued our 2002 decision in PFFA.

Potts v. Department of State Police

31 Or. App. 173 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 17, 1977

, see, Fritz v. … No. 48 v. Fair Dis. App. Bd., 14 Or App 35 , 512 P2d 799 (1973). The jurisdictional issue was not raised in Stephens v.