Case law

Stueve v. Everett

11 Or. App. 18 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 25, 1972

Winslow v. … However, in City of Portland v.

Conner v. B & S LOGGING

153 Or. App. 354 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 1, 1998

The Board subsequently adopted and affirmed the ALJ’s order and supplemented it with its own conclusion that the resolution of the claim was governed by Industrial Indemnity Co. v. … Tektronix, Inc. v.

Tee v. Albertson's, Inc.

107 Or. App. 638 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 19, 1991

Lankford v. Commodore Corporation, 92 Or App 622, 625 , 759 P2d 329 (1988); Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Perry, 92 Or App 56 , 757 P2d 437 , rev den 307 Or 77 (1988); Pournelle v. … Claimant relies on Frame v.

DeNucci v. Henningsen

248 Or. App. 59 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 8, 2012

Mastriano v. Board of Parole, 342 Or 684, 693 , 159 P3d 1151 (2007); Joshi v. Providence Health System, 342 Or 152, 158 , 149 P3d 1164 (2006). … See Brown v. J. C.

Matter of Marriage of Rogers

45 Or. App. 885 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 14, 1980

In Kruger v. … See In re Marriage of Adams, supra; In re Marriage of Brown, 15 Cal 3d 838, 544 P2d 561 , 126 Cal Rptr 633 (1976); Bensing v. Bensing, 25 Cal App 3d 889, 102 Cal Rptr 255 (1972).

State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. McCabe

74 Or. App. 195 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 3, 1985

done by the executive board. … Weller v. Union Carbide, 288 Or 27 , 602 P2d 259 (1979). Additionally, he must establish that the work conditions were the major contributing cause of the worsening of the preexisting condition. Dethlefs v.

MacMillan Plumbing v. Garber

163 Or. App. 165 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 29, 1999

On review, the Board agreed with the ALJ’s determination that Willamette was initially responsible for claimant’s condition. Relying on SAIF v. … Timm v. Maley, 125 Or App 396, 401 , 865 P2d 1315 (1993), rev den 319 Or 81 (1994).

Willamin a School District 30J v. Willamina Education Ass'n

60 Or. App. 629 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 8, 1982

The Board further relied on Brewer v. Allstate Insurance Co., 248 Or 558 , 436 P2d 547 (1968); Wagner v. Columbia Hospital Dist., 259 Or 15 , 485 P2d 421 (1971); and Corvallis Sch. Dist. v. … Assoc. v.

Hall v. Employment Division

31 Or. App. 79 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 4, 1977

The foregoing facts are among those found by the Appeals Board. … See Cantrell v. Employment Division, supra.

Stone v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

57 Or. App. 808 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 16, 1982

Shaw v. Zabel, 267 Or 557 , 517 P2d 1187 (1974); Josephs v. Burns & Bear, 260 Or 493 , 491 P2d 203 (1971). … See Krugen v. Beall Pipe & Tank Corp., 19 Or App 922 , 529 P2d 962 (1974).

State v. Lusareta

270 Or. App. 102 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 25, 2015

Jennings v. … See State v.

State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. Shilling

66 Or. App. 600 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 25, 1984

In the first, we affirmed the Board’s original order finding claimant’s disability to be compensable. Shilling v. SAIF; 46 Or App 117 , 610 P2d 845 (1980). … SAIF, supra, 296 Or at 166 ; SAIF v.

Kirkendall v. STAMPER'S J & J TIRE COMPANY

18 Or. App. 56 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 28, 1974

Swanson v. Westport Lumber Co., supra. Deaton v. … Deaton v. SAIF, supra.

Ventris v. Maass

99 Or. App. 85 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 25, 1989

A person on parole is not confined and is not serving a sentence in an institution 2 Compare State v. Smith, 95 Or App 76 , 767 P2d 480 , rev den 307 Or 719 (1989). … This case is distinguishable from Erbs v. Board of Parole, 90 Or App 253 , 752 P2d 318 (1988), where the Board attempted to parole an inmate on, rather than before, his good time release date.

Bruce v. SAIF Corp.

149 Or. App. 190 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 9, 1997

In Welch v. … Because we cannot tell if the Board applied the correct legal principle, we remand to the Board to clarify and, if necessary, to revise its conclusions. See Tilden v.

Associated Students v. Oregon Investment Council

82 Or. App. 145 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 12, 1986

In Jones v. … Agan et al v. U.S.

Pendleton School Dist. v. State of Oregon

220 Or. App. 56 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 14, 2008

the state for the Board of Forestry to manage. … In Yancy , the Supreme Court explained that a controversy is justiciable when “there is an actual and substantial controversy between parties having adverse legal interests.” 337 Or at 349 (quoting Brown v.

Care Ambulance Co. v. Multnomah County

97 Or. App. 618 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 26, 1989

See Standard Insurance Company v. Washington County, 93 Or App 78 , 761 P2d 534 (1988), pet for rev withdrawn 307 Or 326 (1989). That is the case here. … The court held in a related circuit court action (Care Ambulance Company, Inc. et al v. Multnomah County et al, Multnomah County Circuit Court No.

Roseburg Forest Products v. Clemons

169 Or. App. 231 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 26, 2000

See ORS 174.010; State *240 v. Cook, 163 Or App 578, 586 , 989 P2d 474 (1999). … Because the Board was not interpreting its own rule, we do not defer to its interpretation. See Don’t Waste Oregon Com. v.

KAISER PERMANENTE v. Bonfiglio

241 Or. App. 287 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 2, 2011

See Dietz v. … Board of Parole, 232 Or.App. 75, 84-86 , 220 P.3d 772 (2009); Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or. App. 200, 206 , 752 P.2d 312 (1988).