Case law

Compensation of Million v. State Accident Insurance Fund

45 Or. App. 1097 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 28, 1980

The denial was further affirmed by both the Workers’ Compensation Board and this Court. Million v. SAIF, 35 Or App 269 , 581 P2d 136 (1978). … Taylor v. Baker, 279 Or 139, 144 , 566 P2d 884 (1977); Dean v. Exotic Veneers Inc., 271 Or 188, 194 , 531 P2d 266 (1975).

Spencer Creek Neighbors v. Lane County

152 Or. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 7, 1998

In Fechtig v. … Fechtig, 150 Or App at 14 (quoting Broyles v. Estate of Brown, 295 Or 795, 800-01 , 671 P2d 94 (1983)).

Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Hofstetter

151 Or. App. 21 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 22, 1997

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) in which the Board set aside employer’s denial of claimant’s claim and remanded the claim for processing. … Wright Schuchart Harbor v. Johnson, 133 Or App 680, 685 , 893 P2d 560 (1995).

SAIF v. Houk

316 Or. App. 568 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 22, 2021

For the reasons recently discussed in Bruntz-Ferguson v. Liberty Mutual Ins., 310 Or App 618, 485 P3d 903 (2021), SAIF v. Lynn, 315 Or App 720, 502 P3d 1172 (2021), and Miles v. … SAIF v.

SAIF Corp. v. Pruitt

198 Or. App. 253 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 9, 2005

Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200, 206 , 752 P2d 312 (1998). That relatively deferential standard of review is conditioned by our holding in Dietz v. … Accord SAIF v. Bryant, 173 Or App 402, 406 , 21 P3d 1104 (2001).

Lane Transit District v. Lane County

146 Or. App. 109 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 29, 1997

See Boytano v. Fritz, 321 Or 498, 501-02 , 901 P2d 835 (1995). In Foster v. … In Rose v.

McFetridge v. Wieck

7 Or. App. 389 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 26, 1971

See also, Edwards v. Union H. S. Dist. No. 8, 198 Or 611 , 258 P2d 148 (1953). The trial court concluded that the election was ,in all respects valid and that the school board was *391 authorized to sell the bonds. … oral testimony here to supplement the minutes of the August 8 meeting to determine whether or not the common eon-sent required by ORS 332.045 for the holding of that meeting was obtained. *394 The Supreme Court in McBee v.

Sisters of Providence v. McGuire

183 Or. App. 503 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 28, 2002

Marvin Wood Products v. … Therefore, the board did not err in affirming the ARU and ALJ. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200, 206 , 752 P2d 312 (1988).

Ginter v. Woodburn United Methodist Church

62 Or. App. 118 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 2, 1983

The Board concluded that the expert evidence preponderated against a finding of medical causation. The Board did not reach the issue of penalties and attorney fees. … Frasure v. Agripac, 290 Or 99 , 619 P2d 274 (1980); Saxton v. Lamb-Weston, 49 Or App 887 , 621 P2d 619 (1980), rev den 290 Or 727 (1981).

Sperry, Inc. v. Wells

127 Or. App. 700 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 4, 1994

See Georgia-Pacific v. Piwowar, 305 Or 494 , 753 P2d 948 (1988). … See International Paper Co. v. Pearson, 106 Or App 121 , 806 P2d 189 (1991).

Rogers v. Hewlett-Packard Co.

153 Or. App. 436 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 22, 1998

Cases such as Smith v. SAIF Corp., 302 Or 396 , 730 P2d 30 (1986), and Fred Meyer, Inc. v. … See SAIF v. Frank, 153 Or App 514 , 960 P2d 873 (1998).

Rose v. Saif Corp.

200 Or. App. 654 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 27, 2005

In Yancy v. … The board agreed, and we affirmed.

State v. Koppenhafer

59 Or. App. 213 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 15, 1982

That this said premises is located on the south side of Echo Way and that the front door is dark brown wood which faces north. … The United States Supreme Court held in Aguilar v. Texas, 378 US 108 , 84 S Ct 1509 , 12 L Ed 2d 723 (1964), and Spinelli v.

Fazzolari v. Portland School District No. 1J

78 Or. App. 608 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 16, 1986

Stewart v. … Plaintiff asserts that Brown v. J.C. Penney Co., supra, n 1, controls.

Boise Cascade Corp. v. Hasslen

108 Or. App. 605 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 4, 1991

Fiber Corp. v. … Corp. v. Bird, 99 Or App 560, 564 , 783 P2d 33 (1989), rev den 309 Or 645 (1990). The Board erred in holding that that denial was prospective. The November 15 denial presents a more difficult question.

McKinney v. Employment Division

21 Or. App. 730 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 23, 1975

See Soricelli v. Board of Review, &c., 46 NJ Super 299, 134 A2d 723 (1957). Affirmed. ① See Various Claimants &. Const. U. v. Employment Sec. Com’n, 92 Ariz 183, 375 P2d 380 (1962); Sangamo Electric Co. v. … Donnelley, 26 Ill 2d 348, 186 NE2d 230 (1962); Typographical Union v. Hearst, 246 Md 308, 228 A2d 410 (1967); Soricelli v. Board of Review, &c., 46 NJ Super 299, 134 A2d 723 (1957); Kennecott Copper Corp., Etc. v.

Irvington Transfer v. Jasenosky

116 Or. App. 635 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 2, 1992

In Kessen v. … Employer takes issue with the Board’s conclusion that claimant was not an active participant in the fight. Employer argues that we held in Kessen v. Boise Cascade Corp., supra, and SAIF v.

In THE MATTER OF MORTON v. Northwest Foundry and Furnace

36 Or. App. 259 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 18, 1978

See Barackman v. General Telephone, 25 Or App 293 , 548 P2d 1341 (1976). However, here the Board neither increased nor decreased the previous award and thus its order is not subject to appeal. … the case may be, made by the board on its own motion.”

Maroon v. Great Western Construction

107 Or. App. 510 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 5, 1991

The Board affirmed those determinations, and we agree that they are correct. The Board also “[a]greed with the Referee that claimant was a sole proprietor.” … All the other evidence weighs so heavily against a finding that Great Western was claimant’s business that the Board could not reasonably have found that claimant was its sole proprietor. 2 Younger v.

SAIF Corp. v. Cline

135 Or. App. 155 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 21, 1995

Employer seeks review, arguing that the Board erred in failing to apply OAR 436-30-050(13). 1 Claimant responds that we rejected *158 the same arguments in Nero v. City of Tualatin, 127 Or App 458 , 873 P2d 390 (1994). … In Foster v.