Case law

Troupe v. Labor Ready, Inc.

191 Or. App. 258 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 17, 2003

The board affirmed. … Ligatich v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp., 185 Or App 555, 561 , 60 P3d 1143 (2003). In this case, the board’s finding is supported by substantial evidence. Affirmed.

Dial Temporary Help Service, Inc. v. DLF International Seeds, Inc.

255 Or. App. 609 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 13, 2013

Brown v. American Property Management, 167 Or App 53, 61 , 1 P3d 1051 (2000). He contends that we are bound by that principle and that, accordingly, we erred in affirming the trial court’s grant of summary judgment. … Thus, in Madson v.

Stevenson v. Blue Cross

108 Or. App. 247 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 24, 1991

Dethlefs v. Hyster Co., 295 Or 298, 310 , 667 P2d 487 (1983). Claimant also assigns as error that the Board concluded that SAIF had not accepted her claim for tendonitis. She argues that, under Bowman, v. … Georgia-Pacific v. Piwowar, 305 Or 494, 500 , 753 P2d 948 (1988); see also Johnson v. Spectra Physics, 303 Or 49, *252 56 , 733 P2d 1367 (1987).

State v. George

183 Or. App. 583 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 25, 2002

State v. Amini, 331 Or 384, 394 , 15 P3d 541 (2000). … State v.

Peterson v. State Compensation Department

2 Or. App. 412 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 16, 1970

At this point, claimant’s attorney requested the board to allow an attorney fee, but the board refused. … In Printz v. Compensation Department, 253 Or 148 , 453 P2d 665 (1969), the State Compensation Department rejected a widow’s claim for benefits. Pursuant to her request a hearing was held before a hearing officer.

Oak Crest Care Center v. Bond

101 Or. App. 15 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 21, 1990

The Board relied on Bauman v. SAIF, supra, to make Cigna’s denial invalid. … D Maintenance Company v. Mischke, supra. We do not perceive the Board’s efforts to distinguish Mischke as having any relevance to this conclusion.

Blair v. State Accident Insurance Fund

21 Or. App. 229 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 28, 1975

Nolan v. SAIF, 7 Or App 46 , 489 P2d 974 (1971). … See: Pate v. S.I.A.C., 238 Or 499 , 395 P2d 438 (1964); Buell v. S.I.A.C., 238 Or 492 , 395 P2d 442 (1964); Hamrich v. S.I.A.C., 246 Or 229 , 424 P2d 894 (1967).

Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Pitzer

123 Or. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 1, 1993

Kephart v. Green River Lumber, 118 Or App 76, 79 , 846 P2d 428 (1993); Hicks v. Spectra Physics, 117 Or App 293, 296 , 843 P2d 1009 (1992); Albany General Hospital v. … Marshall v. Korpa, 118 Or App 144, 147 , 846 P2d 445 , rev den 316 Or 528 (1993); see also Drews v. EBI Companies, 310 Or 134 , 795 P2d 531 (1990).

School District No. 1 v. Multnomah County Education Service District

78 Or. App. 247 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 26, 1986

No. 68 v. Hoskins et al, 194 Or 301, 311 , 240 P2d 949 (1952), which may be delegated to a local body. … However, school districts and the Board are, technically speaking, agencies of the executive branch. Monaghan v. School District No. 1, 211 Or 360, 374-76 , 315 P2d 797 (1957).

Lewis v. CIGNA Insurance

192 Or. App. 658 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 7, 2004

Insurer cross-petitioned, renewing its argument that claimant’s failure to request an expedited hearing deprived the board of jurisdiction to hear the case. Relying on SAIF v. … We therefore reversed and remanded the case to the board without reaching claimant’s substantive arguments. Lewis v. Cigna Ins. Co., 174 Or App 531 , 26 P3d 165 (2001).

Pierce v. Douglas School District No. 4

60 Or. App. 285 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 10, 1982

to the school board. … Because petitioner’s offer was revocable, she could revoke it before the board accepted it. See, e.g., Alexander v. Alabama State Tenure Com’n, supra.

Topolic v. Saif Corp.

122 Or. App. 94 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 28, 1993

Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp., supra, 309 Or at 296 . … Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp., supra, 309 Or at 294 . Claimant next assigns error to the Board’s finding that he is not PTD.

Saif Corp. v. Schiller

151 Or. App. 58 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 22, 1997

Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp., 309 Or 292, 295 , 787 P2d 884 (1990); Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200, 206 , 752 P2d 312 (1988). … Yokum, 132 Or App 18, 22 , 887 P2d 380 (1994) (court concluded implicitly that it has jurisdiction over only those issues preserved before the Board); McCarter v.

Wilson v. State Accident Insurance Fund

48 Or. App. 993 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 27, 1980

In Horn v. Timber Products, Inc., 12 Or App 365 , 504 P2d 1059 (1973), claimant had received a permanent disability award which was paid in monthly installments. … We reaffirmed the Horn approach in Taylor v. SAIF, 40 Or 437 , 440, 595 P2d 515 (1979), a case which involved a similar factual issue.

Boeing Aircraft Co. v. Roy

112 Or. App. 10 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 11, 1992

It relies on Weyerhaeuser Co. v. … It argues that that proof is required under Johnsen v.

Wattenbarger v. Boise Cascade Corp.

76 Or. App. 125 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 30, 1985

Uris v. Compensation Department, 247 Or 420, 428 , 427 P2d 753 , 430 P2d 851 (1967). The power to award attorney fees is no broader than that provided by statute. SAIF v. … Forney v. Western States Plywood, 297 Or 628, 634 , 686 P2d 1027 (1984).

State v. Hubbard

290 Or. App. 640 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 7, 2018

When the 1999 legislature granted the board that authority, the defect was cured. Id. ; Cf. State v. Davis , 216 Or. … Defendant's argument relies on State v. Rudder/Webb , 137 Or.

Maddox v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

59 Or. App. 508 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 29, 1982

The Board based its conclusion on a rule it articulated in Harry McGarrah, WCB Case No. 79-05440 (1981). We have rejected the application of that rule in that case. McGarrah v. SAIF, 59 Or App 448 , 651 P2d 153 (1982). … We conclude, as in McGarrah v.

State v. Fernandez

Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 31, 2024

Or Laws 1989, ch 790, § 21; State v. … Id. at 192; see also State v.

Hood River County School District v. Fogle

30 Or. App. 699 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 22, 1977

These requirements are jurisdictional and failure to satisfy them precludes the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board’s consideration of a dismissal appeal. See, Williams v. … Williams v. Cody, 24 Or App at 436 . Respondent’s notice of appeal was received on the same day that she received notice of her dismissal.