Case law

Sabre Farms, Inc. v. Jordan

78 Or. App. 323 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 9, 1986

In Securities-Intermountain v. … Albino v. Albino, supra, 279 Or at 553 .

SAIF Corp. v. Fister

177 Or. App. 13 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 3, 2001

We agreed with her argument and remanded to the Board for reconsideration. Fister v. South Hills Health Care, 149 Or App 214 , 942 P2d 833 (1997), rev den 326 Or 389 (1998). … Teachers v. Mult. Sch. Dist. No. 1, 171 Or App 616, 636-37 , 16 P3d 1189 (2000).

Nelson v. SAIF Corp.

78 Or. App. 75 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 26, 1986

In [Morrison-Knudson Const v. Dir. Wkrs. Comp. … Board, rent, housing or lodging are benefits with a present value that can be readily converted into a cash equivalent on the basis of market values.’ Morrison-Knudson Const. v. Dir. Wkrs. Comp.

Dial Temporary Help Service, Inc. v. DLF International Seeds, Inc.

255 Or. App. 609 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 13, 2013

Brown v. American Property Management, 167 Or App 53, 61 , 1 P3d 1051 (2000). He contends that we are bound by that principle and that, accordingly, we erred in affirming the trial court’s grant of summary judgment. … Thus, in Madson v.

Peterson v. State Compensation Department

2 Or. App. 412 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 16, 1970

At this point, claimant’s attorney requested the board to allow an attorney fee, but the board refused. … In Printz v. Compensation Department, 253 Or 148 , 453 P2d 665 (1969), the State Compensation Department rejected a widow’s claim for benefits. Pursuant to her request a hearing was held before a hearing officer.

State v. Coleman

167 Or. App. 86 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 3, 2000

State v. Brown, 301 Or 268, 277 , 721 P2d 1357 (1986). That per se rule has come to be known as the “automobile exception.” … In the years following Brown and Kock , this court further refined the automobile exception analysis in State v. Cromwell, 109 Or App 654 , 820 P2d 888 (1991), State v.

Cowart v. SAIF Corp.

86 Or. App. 748 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 5, 1987

Madewell v. Salvation Army, 49 Or App 713, 716 , 620 P2d 953 (1980). Although claimant did not receive the notice until January 9, 1984, 1 he received it well before the expiration of 60 days. … The Board is required to make the decision concerning “good cause” on the basis of the considerations in those sources. We reverse and remand for reconsideration. See DeCouteau v.

Travis v. Liberty Mutual Insurance

79 Or. App. 126 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 23, 1986

The only section dealing specifically with the offset of overpayments of temporary total disability is ORS 656.268(4). 2 As we stated in Forney v. … See Forney v. Western States Plywood, supra, 66 Or App at 160 . Additionally, there has been no showing that the delay was unreasonable.

MacKillop v. Employment Department

172 Or. App. 207 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 31, 2001

Linville v. Employment Dept., 146 Or App 317, 323 , 934 P2d 442 (1997). After the Board decided this case, we decided Perez v. Employment Dept., 164 Or App 356 , 992 P2d 460 (1999). … In deciding the issue presented by his argument, we *214 reviewed a number of cases interpreting the rule, including Bunnell v. Employment Division, 304 Or 11 , 741 P2d 887 (1987), Waters v.

Hutchinson v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.

67 Or. App. 577 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 11, 1984

. *582 Johnson v. Industrial Indem., 66 Or App 640 , 675 P2d 498 (1984). … Stoneman v. SAIF, 45 Or App 701 , 609 P2d 408 (1980). 2 We do not express any opinion as to whether employer’s interpretation of the stipulation was correct.

Derryberry v. Dokey

91 Or. App. 533 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 22, 1988

The Derryberrys seek review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board, which found that they are noncomplying employers and held that Bauman v. … On review, the Board agreed that the Derryberrys were noncomplying but found that the claim is not compensable on its facts. The Board concluded, however, that Bauman v.

Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Pitzer

123 Or. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 1, 1993

Kephart v. Green River Lumber, 118 Or App 76, 79 , 846 P2d 428 (1993); Hicks v. Spectra Physics, 117 Or App 293, 296 , 843 P2d 1009 (1992); Albany General Hospital v. … Marshall v. Korpa, 118 Or App 144, 147 , 846 P2d 445 , rev den 316 Or 528 (1993); see also Drews v. EBI Companies, 310 Or 134 , 795 P2d 531 (1990).

Hanna v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

65 Or. App. 649 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 23, 1983

He assigns as error the Board’s admission of two exhibits, which were not admitted at the hearing, and the Board’s finding that he is not permanently and totally disabled. We reverse and reinstate the referee’s order. … Morris v. Denny’s, 50 Or App 533 , 623 P2d 1118 (1981); Butcher v. SAIF, 45 Or App 313 , 608 P2d 575 (1980).

Fischer v. Benton County

244 Or. App. 166 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 13, 2011

Friends of Yamhill County v. Board of Commissioners, 237 Or App 149, 152 , 238 P3d 1016 (2010), rev allowed, 349 Or 602 (2011). … (Emphasis in original.)); Damman v.

State v. Stewart

123 Or. App. 147 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 15, 1993

Defendant’s argument relies primarily on City of Pendleton v. Standerfer, 297 Or 725 , 688 P2d 68 (1984). See also State v. Grenvik, 291 Or 99 , 628 P2d 1195 (1981); Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. … State v. Farmer, 317 Or 220, 224 , 856 P2d 623 (1993); see also State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355 , 800 P2d 259 (1990).

Precision Castparts Corp. v. Plummer

140 Or. App. 227 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 17, 1996

The Board adopted the ALJ’s order. … Volk v. America West Airlines, 135 Or App 565 , 899 P2d 746 (1995). There are no express exceptions applicable to the amendment of ORS 656.283(7).

State v. Hubbard

290 Or. App. 640 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 7, 2018

When the 1999 legislature granted the board that authority, the defect was cured. Id. ; Cf. State v. Davis , 216 Or. … Defendant's argument relies on State v. Rudder/Webb , 137 Or.

Braden v. SAIF Corp.

187 Or. App. 494 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 8, 2003

We have repeatedly interpreted ORS 656.295(6) as granting the board de novo review and as authorizing the board to address issues sua sponte. Christman v. SAIF, 181 Or App 191, 195 , 45 P3d 946 (2002); Destael v. … In Croman Corp. v.

Hammond v. ALBINA ENGINE & MACHINE WORKS, INC.

13 Or. App. 156 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 23, 1973

In that case we dismissed an appeal from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Board that had remanded claimant’s case for a further hearing. In Hiles v. … * * Winters et al v. Grimes et al, 124 Or 214, 216-17 , 264 P 359 (1928).”

Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp. v. Bird

99 Or. App. 560 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 6, 1989

Co. v. Rush, 98 Or App 730 , 780 P2d 748 (1989); Kepford v. Weyerhaeuser, 77 Or App 363 , 713 P2d 625 , rev den 300 Or 722 (1986). In Million v. … Co. v. Rush, supra, 98 Or App at 735 ; Kepford v. Weyerhaeuser, supra, 77 Or App at 365 .