Case law

Callaway v. Employment Department

225 Or. App. 650 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 11, 2009

Jones v. Employment Dept., 199 Or App 571, 575-76 , 112 P3d 453 (2005); Freeman v. Employment Dept., 195 Or App 417, 424 , 98 P3d 402 (2004). … Further, the department’s decision is the one rendered by the authorized representative, not the one made by either the ALJ or the board. McPherson v.

Nollen v. State Accident Insurance Fund

23 Or. App. 420 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 24, 1975

Claimant and his employer made special appearances before the Board and filed motions to quash review because neither had been served. The Board granted both motions. … This court has given its approval to a liberal application of the notice requirements in workmen’s compensation cases since Stroh v. SAIF, 261 Or 117 , 492 P2d 472 (1972). See, Murphy v.

State v. Hager

315 Or. App. 201 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 13, 2021

PER CURIAM Reversed and remanded. 202 State v. … As for the merits of the due process question, we see little difference between this matter and our recent deci- sion in State v. Brown, 313 Or App 283, 284-86, 496 P3d 701 (2021).

Stepp v. SAIF Corp.

78 Or. App. 438 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 9, 1986

Claimant seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order reversing a referee’s award of permanent total disability. … Waldroup v. J. C. Penney Co., 30 Or App 443, 448 , 567 P2d 576 (1977). That determination cannot be relitigated in an aggravation claim. Deaton v. SAIF, 33 Or App 261, 263 , 576 P2d 35 (1978).

Glide School District No. 12 v. Carell

39 Or. App. 727 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 23, 1979

See Lincoln County School District v. Mayer, 39 Or App 99 , 591 P2d 755 (1979). … See Reynolds School Dist. v. Martin, 30 Or App 39 , 566 P2d 196 (1977); Lincoln County School District v. Mayer, supra.

In Re Ma-J.

228 Or. App. 580 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 27, 2009

As for the patdown, the state contends that, under the Supreme Court's decision in State v. … In State v.

Davis v. Aetna Casualty Co.

102 Or. App. 132 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 13, 1990

In Greenslitt v. … See SAIF v. Peoples, 59 Or App 593, 595 , 651 P2d 1359 (1982).

Bledsoe v. City of Lincoln City

301 Or. App. 11 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 4, 2019

SAIF v. Coburn, 159 Or App 413, 419, 977 P2d 412, rev den, 329 Or 527 (1999) (citing Fazzolari v. … .”)); Strazi v.

Fenimore v. Blachly-Lane Cnty. C.E.A.

297 Or. App. 47 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 10, 2019

See PGE v. … Safeway, Inc. v. OPEU , 152 Or. App. 349 , 357, 954 P.2d 196 (1998) ; see also Tanner v. OHSU , 157 Or.

Schaaf v. Eugene School District No. 4J

19 Or. App. 838 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 23, 1974

Interpreting a predecessor statute, in Funston v. … Makinson v. School District No. 4, 209 Or 232 , 304 P2d 1076 (1956), involved a teacher reduced from full-time to half-time employment. The school board contended there was a nonpersonal reason for the change.

Furrer v. Southwestern Oregon Community College

196 Or. App. 374 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 8, 2004

Swenson v. … In Bixler v.

Roseburg Forest Products v. Lund

245 Or. App. 65 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 17, 2011

Brumnett v. PSRB, 315 Or 402, 405-06 , 848 P2d 1194 (1993). … In that light, we understand employer to contend that the board mischaracterized the scope of its acceptance. We disagree. In Columbia Forest Products v.

SAIF Corp. v. Drews

117 Or. App. 596 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 20, 1993

See Tektronix, Inc. v. Nazari, 117 Or App 409 , 844 P2d 258 (1992). … The Board held that Wausau had met that burden and assigned responsibility for the condition to SAIF. *600 We agree witH the Board’s analysis.

Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Roller

85 Or. App. 500 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 27, 1987

The Board relied in part on SAIF v. Maddox, 295 Or 448 , 667 P2d 529 (1983). … Employer contends that SAIF v.

Wayne-Dalton Corp. v. Mulford

190 Or. App. 370 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 5, 2003

The board based its ruling on two of our previous decisions, Templeton v. Pope and Talbot, Inc., 7 Or App 119 , 490 P2d 205 (1971), and Liberty Northwest Insurance Co. v. Meeker, 106 Or App 411 , 807 P2d 342 (1991). … More significantly, those cases were decided before PGE v. Bureau of Labor and Industries, 317 Or 606 , 859 P2d 1143 (1993).

State v. Martinez-Garcia

283 Or. App. 473 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 25, 2017

Brown v. United States, 356 US 148, 155-56 , 78 S Ct 622 , 2 L Ed 2d 589 (1958); Lea, 146 Or App at 482-83 . … See Redwine v.

Multnomah County School District v. Tigner

113 Or. App. 405 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 10, 1992

The Board denied that request, because it believed that it lacked jurisdiction to order reimbursement between insurers. In Western Employers Ins. v. … Corp. v. SAIF, 99 Or App *410 729, 733, 784 P2d 123 (1989). Accordingly, the Board did not err by concluding that it lacked jurisdiction to order reimbursement.

Tucker v. Lampert

174 Or. App. 373 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 23, 2001

An administrative body, such as the Board, possesses only those powers that the legislature grants and cannot exercise authority that it does not possess. Gaynor v. … See ORS 144.050 (authorizing Board to set terms of parole for offenders whose offenses were committed prior to November 1, 1989); Williams v.

Bronco Cleaners v. Velazquez

141 Or. App. 295 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 29, 1996

We conclude that the Board did not err. Affirmed. 1 Petitioners on appeal are Bronco Cleaners and its insurer, Liberty Northwest Insurance Corp. We refer to petitioners as employer. 2 Employer cites Allie v. … SAIF, 79 Or App 284, 288 , 719 P2d 47 (1986), and Edwards v.

McAlpine v. Multnomah County

131 Or. App. 136 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 26, 1994

Fazzolari v. Portland School Dist. No. 1J, supra; Buchler v. … Torres v. Pacific Power and Light, 84 Or App 412, 415 , 734 P2d 364 , rev dismissed 304 Or 1 (1987) (negligence per se); Dunlap v.