Case law

Cole v. Chemeketa Community College

58 Or. App. 77 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 8, 1982

Henthorn v. Grand Prairie School Dist., 287 Or 683 , 601 P2d 1243 (1979), involved a probationary teacher who sought a writ of review challenging the defendant school board’s refusal to renew his employment contract. … In Maddox v. Clac. Co. Sch. Dist. No. 25, 293 Or 27 , 643 P2d 1253 (1982), a terminated probationary teacher filed an action for breach of contract.

State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. Casteel

74 Or. App. 566 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 17, 1985

Claimant requested review by this court, and we modified the Board’s order and granted claimant an award of 50 percent unscheduled permanent partial disability. Casteel v. SAIF, 55 Or App 474 , 638 P2d 1165 (1982). … In Bekins Moving and Storage Co. v.

Sekermestrovich v. State Accident Insurance Fund

28 Or. App. 901 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 28, 1977

Brooks v. Employment Division, 24 Or App 547, 550 , 546 P2d 760 (1976). In this context, the discretion of the Workmen’s Compensation Board is equally broad. … We therefore hold that, at least absent additional factors affecting claimant’s capacity to conduct her own affairs, the Board was justified in refusing to find good cause. See Fulop v. Oregonian Pub.

State v. Coughennower

95 Or. App. 699 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 22, 1989

State v. Brown, 301 Or 268 , 721 P2d 1357 (1986). To apply that exception, we must determine if the police had probable cause to believe that the automobile contained contraband or evidence of a crime. State v. … Brown, supra, 301 Or at 276 .

Gresham Grade Teachers Ass'n v. Gresham Grade School District No. 4

52 Or. App. 881 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 29, 1981

Wasco County v. AFSCME, 46 Or App 859 , 613 P2d 1067 (1980); see also, Labor Board v. Katz, 369 US 736 , 82 S Ct 1107 , 8 L Ed 2d 230 (1962). … Dist. v.

State v. Kennedy

196 Or. App. 681 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 29, 2004

We compared State v. … Id.; see also State v.

SAIF Corp. v. Barajas

107 Or. App. 73 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 15, 1991

But see SAIF v. Reel, 81 Or App 258, 260 , 724 P2d 914 (1986), aff'd 303 Or 210 , 735 P2d 364 (1987). The Board said that it did “not necessarily agree” with that, but it did not analyze the issue any further. … Because the findings are insufficient, the Board’s order is insufficient for review and must be remanded for further findings respecting the applicability of ORS 656.005(7)(a)(A). See Teledyne Wah Chang v.

Hickey v. Hickey

269 Or. App. 258 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 25, 2015

Stull v. … For example, in Browning v.

King v. Building Supply Discount

133 Or. App. 179 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 22, 1995

The Board reasoned, therefore, that the only claim before the referee had been for the heart attack. … Compare Altamirano v. Woodburn Nursery, 133 Or App 16 , 889 P2d 1305 (1995). SAIF’s June 8, 1988, denial specifically includes that condition.

State v. Lowry

59 Or. App. 338 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 15, 1982

This case is a sequel to State v. Brown, 291 Or 642 , 634 P2d 212 (1981). … had not raised it below, but the court cited State v.

Swezey v. Employment Division

47 Or. App. 923 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 18, 1980

Only the Board questioned the cause of petitioner’s physical discomfort. We hold that this injection of this new issue into the case was improper. See Kuraspediani v. … In its brief to us, the Division stated, "In McPherson v.

Callaway v. Employment Department

225 Or. App. 650 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 11, 2009

Jones v. Employment Dept., 199 Or App 571, 575-76 , 112 P3d 453 (2005); Freeman v. Employment Dept., 195 Or App 417, 424 , 98 P3d 402 (2004). … Further, the department’s decision is the one rendered by the authorized representative, not the one made by either the ALJ or the board. McPherson v.

Nollen v. State Accident Insurance Fund

23 Or. App. 420 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 24, 1975

Claimant and his employer made special appearances before the Board and filed motions to quash review because neither had been served. The Board granted both motions. … This court has given its approval to a liberal application of the notice requirements in workmen’s compensation cases since Stroh v. SAIF, 261 Or 117 , 492 P2d 472 (1972). See, Murphy v.

State v. Hager

315 Or. App. 201 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 13, 2021

PER CURIAM Reversed and remanded. 202 State v. … As for the merits of the due process question, we see little difference between this matter and our recent deci- sion in State v. Brown, 313 Or App 283, 284-86, 496 P3d 701 (2021).

In Re Ma-J.

228 Or. App. 580 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 27, 2009

As for the patdown, the state contends that, under the Supreme Court's decision in State v. … In State v.

Davis v. Aetna Casualty Co.

102 Or. App. 132 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 13, 1990

In Greenslitt v. … See SAIF v. Peoples, 59 Or App 593, 595 , 651 P2d 1359 (1982).

Bledsoe v. City of Lincoln City

301 Or. App. 11 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 4, 2019

SAIF v. Coburn, 159 Or App 413, 419, 977 P2d 412, rev den, 329 Or 527 (1999) (citing Fazzolari v. … .”)); Strazi v.

Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Roller

85 Or. App. 500 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 27, 1987

The Board relied in part on SAIF v. Maddox, 295 Or 448 , 667 P2d 529 (1983). … Employer contends that SAIF v.

Columbia Riverkeeper v. Clatsop County

267 Or. App. 578 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 17, 2014

Although the statute does not define “final order,” see Beck v. … See Lane County v.

Multnomah County School District v. Tigner

113 Or. App. 405 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 10, 1992

The Board denied that request, because it believed that it lacked jurisdiction to order reimbursement between insurers. In Western Employers Ins. v. … Corp. v. SAIF, 99 Or App *410 729, 733, 784 P2d 123 (1989). Accordingly, the Board did not err by concluding that it lacked jurisdiction to order reimbursement.