Case law

Russell v. State Accident Insurance Fund

33 Or. App. 153 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 13, 1978

We conclude that this case should be remanded to the Workers’ Compensation Board for a redetermination of the extent of claimant’s permanent partial disability in the light of Russell v. … In several cases this court has echoed the rule that some deference to the Board on the extent of partial disability is appropriate. Hart v. SAIF, 31 Or App 181 , 570 P2d 92 (1977); Frantz v.

SAIf Corp. v. Alton

171 Or. App. 491 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 20, 2000

See SAIF v. … See SAIF v.

Newcomb v. Thompson

176 Or. App. 167 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 15, 2001

Weidner v. Armenakis, 154 Or App 12, 19 , 959 P2d 623 , vac’d and rent’d 327 Or 317 (1998), withdrawn by order July 13, 1998, reasoning readopted and reaffirmed in Merrill v. … However, we also have held that a prerequisite for such a finding by the Board is a “psychiatric or psychological diagnosis.” ORS 144.125(3) (1991). Christenson v. Thompson, 176 Or App 54 , 31 P3d 449 (2001).

SAIF Corp. v. Orr

101 Or. App. 612 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 23, 1990

Grant v. State Industrial Acc. Com., 102 Or at 45; see 1 Larson, Workmen’s Compensation Law [§ 13.22].’ ” 296 Or at 251 . The Board considered the relevant factors. … It has been held that the Board must make express findings on that issue. SAIF v. Stephen, 308 Or 41,47-48 , 774 P2d 1103 (1989).

Hiles v. STATE COMPENSATION DEPARTMENT

2 Or. App. 506 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 4, 1970

See also Barr v. State Compensation Dept., 1 Or App 432 , 463 P2d 871 (1970). … Beaudry v.

Roseburg Forest Products v. McDonald

116 Or. App. 448 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 18, 1992

Employer relies on Georgia-Pacific v. Hughes, 305 Or 286 , 751 P2d 775 (1988), and Hunter v. … In Georgia-Pacific v.

Sparling v. Providence Health System Oregon

258 Or. App. 275 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 21, 2013

Cf Altamirano v. … Co. v.

City of Eugene v. McCann

248 Or. App. 527 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 7, 2012

Young v. State of Oregon, 246 Or App 115, 119 , 265 P3d 32 (2011). … See, e.g., Wright v.

Compensation of Button v. State Accident Insurance Fund

45 Or. App. 295 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 17, 1980

Francoeur v. SAIF, 20 Or App 604, 611 , 532 P2d 1148 (1975), rev den, 1974. We decline to alter the Board’s decision. … See Moe v. Ceiling Systems, Inc., 44 Or App 429 , 606 P2d 644 (February 11, 1980).

Lemmon v. Clemens

57 Or. App. 583 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 9, 1982

In Meyer v. … In Flury v. Land Use Board, 50 Or App 263 , 623 *589 P2d 671 (1981), involving a proposed subdivision, we held that only the affected land needed to be considered in determining the predominant soil classifications.

North Clackamas School District No. 12 v. North Clackamas Education Ass'n

54 Or. App. 211 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 12, 1981

Dist. v. … See Ostrer v. Pine-Eagle School Dist., supra, 40 Or App at 269, n 5 . In a recent case, Portland Assn. of Teachers v. School Dist.

Hart v. State Accident Insurance Fund

31 Or. App. 181 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 17, 1977

In all but "uncomplicated situation[s],” see, Uris v. … As was stated in Larson v. State Ind. Acc.

McWhorter v. First Interstate Bank of Oregon, N.A.

81 Or. App. 132 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 10, 1986

by the board. … Defendant argues next that the board ratified the president’s dismissal of plaintiff. That argument is contrary to Wiskotoni v. Michigan Nat.

Deschutes County v. Leak

322 Or. App. 396 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 19, 2022

Don’t Waste Oregon Committee v. … See Rushton v.

Agricomp Insurance v. Tapp

169 Or. App. 208 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 26, 2000

SAIF v. Yokum, 132 Or App 18, 24-25 , 887 P2d 380 (1994). … As mentioned above, PAULA’s complaint is that the Board did not apply the rule of law established in SAIF v.

EBI Companies v. Cooper

100 Or. App. 246 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 17, 1990

See Schlect v. SAIF, 60 Or App 449, 455 , 653 P2d 1284 (1982). … The Board stated: “In Ebbtide Enterprises v.

Fischer v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

76 Or. App. 656 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 4, 1985

Tektronix Corp. v. Twist, 62 Or App 602 , 661 P2d 562 , rev den 295 Or 259 (1983). In Knapp v. … Cascade Steel Rolling Mills v. Madril, 62 Or App 598 , 661 P2d 564 , rev den 295 Or 541 (1983), applied the rule in holding that previous overpayments on a prior claim could not be offset in a later claim. Forney v.

Willamette Industries, Inc. v. Titus

151 Or. App. 76 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 22, 1997

Roseburg Forest Products v. Long, 325 Or 305, 309 , 937 P2d 517 (1997) (citing Runft v. SAIF, 303 Or 493, 500 , 739 P2d 12 (1987)). … Roseburg Forest Products v. Long, 325 Or 305, 313 , 937 P2d 517 (1997). See also Beneficiaries of Strametz v. Spectrum Motorwerks, 325 Or 439,444-45 , 939 P2d 617 (1997); Boise Cascade Corp. v.

State v. Sleeper

36 Or. App. 227 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 18, 1978

Likewise, the circuit court lacked jurisdiction to conduct a trial of the municipal violation. 2 Consequently, the DUII and CAID charges could not be tried together and we conclude under State v. … Brown, supra, that the second prosecution for the CAID charge was not constitutionally prohibited. Affirmed.

Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp. v. Nichols

186 Or. App. 664 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 6, 2003

Andrews v. Tektronix, Inc., 323 Or 154 , 160-61 n 1, 915 P2d 972 (1996) (emphasis in original). … In Kaiel v.