Case law

Goddard v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.

193 Or. App. 238 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 28, 2004

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board, issued pursuant to the board’s own motion authority, ORS 656.278, in which the board held, inter alia, that it lacked statutory authority to award claimant … See ORS 183.482(6); see also Tektronix Corp. v. Twist, 62 Or App 602, 604-05 , 661 P2d 562 , rev den, 295 Or 259 (1983) (ORS 183.482(6) applies to orders of the Workers’ Compensation Board).

Wallis v. Crook County School District

13 Or. App. 174 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 23, 1973

Accord: Tempe Union High School Dist. v. Hopkins, 76 Ariz 228, 262 P2d 387 (1953); Reed v. Board of Education, 125 Cal App 714, 14 P2d 330 (1932); Smith v. … School District No. 18, 115 Mont 102 , 139 P2d 518 (1943); Tate v. New Mexico State Board of Education, 81 NM 323 , 466 P2d 889 (NM App 1970); Blood v.

Oregon Drywall Systems, Inc. v. Bacon

208 Or. App. 205 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 27, 2006

Co. v. … See SAIF v. Belden, 155 Or App 568, 575 , 964 P2d 300 (1998), rev den, 328 Or 330 (1999) *210 (compensability of combined condition may not coincide with medically stationary date of compensable condition).

Diamond Fruit Growers v. Goss

120 Or. App. 390 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 19, 1993

Our holding here makes it necessary to modify in part our decision in Bird v. … See Krieger v. Future Logging, 116 Or App 537 , 842 P2d 428 (1992). In Bird v.

Ricard v. Klamath Falls Forest Estates HOA

328 Or. App. 46 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 13, 2023

Finally, the court concluded: 56 Ricard v. … Eklof v. Steward, 360 Or 717, 730, 385 P3d 1074 (2016); Two Two v. Fujitec America, Inc., 355 Or 319, 325-26, 325 P3d 707 (2014); Woodroffe v. State of Oregon, 292 Or App 21, 27, 422 P3d 381 (2018).

SAIF Corp. v. Yokum

132 Or. App. 18 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 21, 1994

Both ORS 656.308(1) and SAIF v. … Group v. Young, 126 Or App 117 , 866 P2d 524 (1994), and Crawford & Company v. Liberty Northwest Ins.

Higley v. Edwards

67 Or. App. 488 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 28, 1984

See Glide School Dist. v. Carell, 39 Or App 727, 732 , 593 P2d 1224 (1979); see also Richardson v. Perales, 402 US 389 , 91 S Ct 1420 , 28 L Ed 2d 842 (1971); Calhoun v. … Black, 251 Or 177, 186 , 444 P2d 929 (1968); see also State v. Middleton, 295 Or 485 , 668 P2d 371 (1983); State v. Green, 271 Or 153 , 531 P2d 245 (1975); State v. Kerstig, 50 Or App 461 , 623 P2d 1095 (1981).

Liberty Northwest Insurance Corporation v. Koitzsch

135 Or. App. 524 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 19, 1995

Claimant petitioned for judicial review of an order of the Board that rejected her claim for additional disability compensation. We reversed and remanded for reconsideration. Koitzsch v. Liberty Northwest Ins. … England v. Thunderbird, 315 Or 633, 638 , 848 P2d 100 (1993). We begin with the text and context of the statute, which includes both prior versions of the statute and prior judicial construction of it. Mathel v.

Boeing Co. v. Viltrakis

112 Or. App. 396 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 22, 1992

Williams v. Gates, McDonald & Co., 300 Or 278, 281 , 709 P2d 712 (1985). The Board held that claimant met that burden. … We held in American Nursing v. Yost, 108 Or App 243 , 815 P2d 708 (1991), and Nordstrom, Inc. v.

Williams v. State Accident Insurance Fund

31 Or. App. 1301 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 27, 1977

Holden v. Willamette Industries, 28 Or App 613, 618 , 560 P2d 298 (1977). … Wingfield v. National Biscuit Co., 8 Or App 408, 413 , 494 P2d 905 (1972).

Stewart v. City of Salem

240 Or. App. 466 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 26, 2011

The board reversed the city’s decision and ordered it to approve petitioner’s partition application. We affirmed the board’s determination on review, Stewart v. … See Parquit Corp. v.

Kasch's Garden Centers & Nurseries v. Department of Agriculture

85 Or. App. 377 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 6, 1987

See Derenco v. Benjamin Franklin Savings & Loan, 281 Or 533 , 577 P2d 477 (1978). Rule held valid. … The Secretary of Agriculture has not established a quarantine of the brown garden snail.

Penifold v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

49 Or. App. 1015 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 29, 1980

Buster v. Chase Bag Co., 14 Or App 323 , 513 P2d 504 (1973). Hamilton v. SAIF, 11 Or App 344 , 501 P2d 1007 (1972), rev den (1973); Sahnow v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. … See Brenner v. Industrial Indemnity Co., 30 Or App 69 , 566 P2d 530 (1977); Petersen v. Travelers Insurance., 21 Or App 637 , 536 P2d 448 (1975); Sahnow v. Fireman’s Fund Ins.

Perrin v. Kitzhaber

191 Or. App. 439 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 21, 2004

Finally, Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human Resources, 532 US 598 , 121 S Ct 1835 , 149 L Ed 2d 855 (2001), is also instructive. … Del Rio, 67 SW3d 85, 88 (Tex 2001) (when concurrent suits are filed in state and federal court, Growe requires the federal court to defer *444 to the state process); Brown v.

Rowden v. Hogan Woods, LLC

306 Or. App. 658 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 30, 2020

Co. v. … Assn. v.

Neely v. State Accident Insurance Fund

43 Or. App. 319 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 26, 1979

Francoeur v. SAIF, 20 Or App 604, 607 , 532 P2d 1148 (1975). The Board’s review is de novo. Robertson v. SAIF, 17 Or App 280, 281 , 521 P2d 1088 (1974). … Fundamental fairness may dictate that the Board ould not decide a claim on the basis of evidence not the record, McManus v. State Acc. Ins.

Ransom v. United States National Bank

10 Or. App. 158 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 27, 1972

The notice did not reflect service upon the Board. The Board was not in fact served until August 25, 1971, or 107 days after the order of the Board was mailed May 10, 1971. … Claimant relies principally on Stroh v. SAIF, 261 Or 117 , 492 P2d 472 (1972), as her authority for the proposition that her late service upon the Board may be excused.

Worldmark the Club v. Travis

161 Or. App. 644 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 7, 1999

SAIF v. Nehl, 149 Or App 309, 311-12 , 942 P2d 859 (1997), rev den 326 Or 389 (1998); Dietz v. Ramuda, 130 Or App 397, 401 , 882 P2d 618 (1994). … Because that evaluation involves a complex medical question, the Board must generally rely on expert medical evidence. See Uris v. Compensation Department, 247 Or 420, 424-26 , 427 P2d 753 (1967).

Atkins v. Allied Systems, Ltd.

175 Or. App. 487 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 1, 2001

Our holding in Snyder meant that the Board was entitled to weigh even uncontroverted evidence to determine if it satisfied the claimant’s burden of persuasion. See also Agripac, Inc. v. … .”); Libbett v.

Sterling v. Blalock

47 Or. App. 275 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 21, 1980

Harris v. … See also Brooks v. Dierker, 275 Or 619, 624 , 552 P2d 533 (1976); Fields v. Workmen’s Comp. Board, 26 Or App 323, 325 , 552 P2d 834 , rev’d 276 Or 805 , 556 P2d 651 (1976); Cornelius v.