Case law

Rehfeld v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services

283 Or. App. 288 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 5, 2017

Baker v. Liberty Northwest Ins. … Claimant bases her contention on United Airlines v.

State v. Graville

82 Or. App. 253 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 12, 1986

State v. Warren, 81 Or App 463 , 726 P2d 387 (1986). … State v. Age, 38 Or App 501, 508-509 , 590 P2d 759 (1979); see State v. Behar, 39 Or App 503 , 592 P2d 1056 (1979). Defendant urges us to overrule Age and Behar , citing as authority State v.

Tucker v. Geico Casualty Co.

317 Or. App. 370 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 2, 2022

370 Submitted January 5, affirmed February 2, 2022 Demetrius TUCKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … Brown and Gordon & Polscer, LLC filed the brief for respondent. Before Mooney, Presiding Judge, and Lagesen, Chief Judge, and DeHoog, Judge pro tempore. PER CURIAM Affirmed. Koenig v.

Amalgamated Transit Union, Division 757 v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District

250 Or. App. 681 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 27, 2012

Id.; see also Harris v. … Marvin Wood Products v. Callow, 171 Or App 175, 179-80 , 14 P3d 686 (2000). Applying that discussion to our task on judicial review, we stated in Bluemer v.

AIG Claim Services Inc. v. Cole

205 Or. App. 170 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 19, 2006

Citing Counts v. … In Counts , we cited our opinion in Brooks v. *175 D & R Timber, 55 Or App 688, 692 , 639 P2d 700 (1982), for the rule that “if diagnostic services are necessary to determine the cause or extent of a compensable injury, the

Baker v. Liberty Northwest Insurance

257 Or. App. 205 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 19, 2013

The board rejected claimant’s contention that the claim was timely under this court’s opinions in Ahlberg v. SAIF, 199 Or App 271 , 111 P3d 778 (2005), and Kepford v. … Bohemia, Inc. v. McKillop, 112 Or App 261 , 828 P2d 1041 (1992). The start of the limitation period is suspended until the last of the events occurs. Interstate Metal v.

Croman Corp. v. Serrano

163 Or. App. 136 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 29, 1999

Altamirano v. Woodburn Nursery, Inc., 133 Or App 16 , 889 P2d 1305 (1995); Evanite Fiber Corp. v. Striplin, 99 Or App 353, 357 , 781 P2d 1262 (1989). … SAIF v. Beldon, 155 Or App 568, 574 , 904 P2d 300 (1998), rev den 328 Or 330 (1999) (footnote omitted).

Sothras v. Employment Division

48 Or. App. 69 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 2, 1980

One of these two Board members, relying on our decision in Arias v. … In McPherson v.

Wise v. Hays

74 Or. App. 245 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 3, 1985

See Esperum v. Board of Parole, 296 Or 789 , 681 P2d 1128 (1984); Harris v. Board of Parole, 47 Or App 289 , 614 P2d 602 , rev den 290 Or 157 (1980); ORS 144.335. … State ex rel LeVasseur v. Merten, 297 Or 577, 580 , 686 P2d 366 (1984). Having failed to seek judicial review of the Board’s order, plaintiff is not now entitled to relief by writ of mandamus. Rosboro Lumber Co. v.

Jackson County v. Wehren

186 Or. App. 555 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 19, 2003

Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200, 206 , 752 P2d 312 (1988). Before this court, employer renews its attack on the board’s acceptance of Grant’s opinion instead of Thompson’s. … Palmer v. SAIF, 78 Or App 151, 157 , 714 P2d 1102 (1986).

Vip's Restaurant v. Krause

89 Or. App. 214 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 13, 1988

We agree with the Board’s determination and conclude that employer was required to pay benefits for temporary total disability through the date of the June 6,1986, determination order. As we held in Noffsinger v. … SAIF v. Maddox, 295 Or 448, 454 , 667 P2d 529 (1983).

State v. Hall

166 Or. App. 348 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 22, 2000

See State v. … See State v.

Johnston v. James River Corp.

91 Or. App. 721 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 22, 1988

PER CURIAM In this workers’ compensation case, we review under the standards stated in Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200 , 752 P2d 312 (1988). … See George v. Richard’s Food Center, 90 Or App 639 , 752 P2d 1309 (1988). When the Board reverses, adequate judicial review requires specific findings in the Board’s opinion substantiating its contrary conclusion.

State v. Furrillo

274 Or. App. 612 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 4, 2015

State v. Bennett / McCall, 265 Or App 448, 455 , 338 P3d 143 (2014) (citing State v. Brown, *615 301 Or 268, 276 , 721 P2d 1357 (1986)). … State v. Smalley, 233 Or App 263, 267 , 225 P3d 844 , rev den, 348 Or 415 (2010); see also Brown, 301 Or at 279 .

SAIF v. Krusenstjerna

346 Or. App. 429 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 7, 2026

Providence Health System v. … On this record then, the board opinion lacks sub- stantial evidence and substantial reason. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp. v.

Asten-Hill Co. v. Armstrong

100 Or. App. 559 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 21, 1990

Stupfel v. Edward Hines Lumber Co., 288 Or 39 , 602 P2d 264 (1979). The Board relied on expert opinions from Dr. Parosa and Dr. Montanaro. … Because of that misstatement, we cannot say whether there is substantial evidence to support the Board’s conclusion on compensability. See Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., supra, 90 Or App at 206 .

Bergerson v. Salem-Keizer School District

194 Or. App. 301 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 28, 2004

Failure on the part of FDAB to do so suggests that it impermissibly substituted its own judgment for that of the school board. See Jefferson County School Dist. No. 509-J v. … Thyfault v. Pendleton School District No. 16R, FDA 90-4 (Jan 18, 1991) (upholding dismissal based, in part, on spanking of child); see also Webster v.

Altamirano v. Woodburn Nursery, Inc.

133 Or. App. 16 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 15, 1995

The Board erred in upholding the denial. 1 Claimant next assigns error to the Board’s denial of interim compensation. … Cook v. Workers’ Compensation Department, supra, 306 Or at 138 . Therefore, the Board erred in applying OAR 436-10-005(1)(c) to deny claimant’s request for interim compensation.

Metje v. Pub. Emps. Ret. Sys.

291 Or. App. 338 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 18, 2018

As we explained in Harris v. Dept. of Public Safety Standards , 287 Or. App. 111 , 113, 400 P.3d 1032 , rev. den. , 362 Or. 94 , 405 P.3d 152 (2017), and Lucke v. DPSST , 247 Or. … the board has commenced proceedings to recover the payment.

McDowell v. State Accident Insurance Fund

13 Or. App. 389 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 31, 1973

See, Verban v. State Ind. Acc. Com., 168 Or 394 , 123 P2d 988 (1942); Hinkle v. State Ind. Acc. Com., 163 Or 395 , 97 P2d 725 (1940) *395 (partially overruled on a different point in Dimitroff v. State Ind. Acc. … See, Murray v. Lamb, 174 Or 239 , 148 P2d 797 (1944); Whitney v. Whitney et al., 114 Or 102 , 235 P 293 (1925).