Case law

In re the Marriage of Hadley

77 Or. App. 295 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 22, 1986

Abraham v. Abraham, 248 Or 163, 164 , 432 P2d 797 (1967); Brown v. Brown, 28 Or App 535, 537 , 559 P2d 1332 (1977). … See Brown v. Brown, supra. The question is whether the trial court had the authority, without a change of circumstances, to order the Secretary to make payments directly to wife from husband’s retirement pay.

Willamina Education Ass'n v. Willamina School District 30J

50 Or. App. 195 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 3, 1981

The standard of review applied by this Board is that enunciated by the National Labor Relations Board in Spielberg Manufacturing Co. and its progeny, adopted by this Board in Siegel v. … "The tests applied in deciding whether or not this Board should defer to a prior arbitration award in unfair labor practice cases are found in Siegal [sic] v. Gresham Grade Teachers Association, Case No.

Meier & Frank Co. v. Smith-Sanders

115 Or. App. 159 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 9, 1992

Marshall v. Wilson, 175 Or 506, 518 , 154 P2d 547 (1944). ‘The doctrine of estoppel is only intended to protect those who materially change their position in reliance upon another’s acts or representations.’ Bash v. … Eastmoreland Hospital v. Reeves, 94 Or App 698, 702 , 767 P2d 97 (1989).

Early v. Employment Department

274 Or. App. 321 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 14, 2015

“We review the [board’s] order for substantial evidence and errors of law, and to determine whether its analysis comports with substantial reason.” Campbell v. … See PUC v.

Court v. State Accident Insurance Fund

25 Or. App. 691 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 14, 1976

The request for further hearings and appeals could act only as a rejection by claimant and trigger the medical board of review process. Billings v. Crouse, supra; Ware v. SAIF, 7 Or App 571 , 492 P2d 484 (1972). … Their orders are therefore reversed and the case remanded to the Workmen’s Compensation Board for appointment of a medical board of review pursuant to former ORS 656.810.” Billings v.

Castro v. Maass

139 Or. App. 69 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 7, 1996

State of Oregon, 322 Or 101, 108 , 902 P2d 1137 (1995) (quoting Trujillo v. Maass, 312 Or 431, 435 , 822 P2d 703 (1991)). … Yeager v. Maass, 93 Or App 561, 564 , 763 P2d 184 (1988), rev den 307 Or 340 (1989). We conclude that it was not.

Rehfeld v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services

283 Or. App. 288 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 5, 2017

Baker v. Liberty Northwest Ins. … Claimant bases her contention on United Airlines v.

Tucker v. Geico Casualty Co.

317 Or. App. 370 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 2, 2022

370 Submitted January 5, affirmed February 2, 2022 Demetrius TUCKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … Brown and Gordon & Polscer, LLC filed the brief for respondent. Before Mooney, Presiding Judge, and Lagesen, Chief Judge, and DeHoog, Judge pro tempore. PER CURIAM Affirmed. Koenig v.

AIG Claim Services Inc. v. Cole

205 Or. App. 170 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 19, 2006

Citing Counts v. … In Counts , we cited our opinion in Brooks v. *175 D & R Timber, 55 Or App 688, 692 , 639 P2d 700 (1982), for the rule that “if diagnostic services are necessary to determine the cause or extent of a compensable injury, the

Baker v. Liberty Northwest Insurance

257 Or. App. 205 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 19, 2013

The board rejected claimant’s contention that the claim was timely under this court’s opinions in Ahlberg v. SAIF, 199 Or App 271 , 111 P3d 778 (2005), and Kepford v. … Bohemia, Inc. v. McKillop, 112 Or App 261 , 828 P2d 1041 (1992). The start of the limitation period is suspended until the last of the events occurs. Interstate Metal v.

Croman Corp. v. Serrano

163 Or. App. 136 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 29, 1999

Altamirano v. Woodburn Nursery, Inc., 133 Or App 16 , 889 P2d 1305 (1995); Evanite Fiber Corp. v. Striplin, 99 Or App 353, 357 , 781 P2d 1262 (1989). … SAIF v. Beldon, 155 Or App 568, 574 , 904 P2d 300 (1998), rev den 328 Or 330 (1999) (footnote omitted).

State v. King

67 Or. App. 749 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 18, 1984

As they crossed over the connecting road they saw defendant get out of the occupied car and walk to the empty car carrying a brown paper bag. … State v. Valdez, 277 Or 621, 629 , 561 P2d 1006 (1977).

Leaton v. State Accident Insurance Fund

27 Or. App. 669 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 13, 1976

The Workmen’s Compensation Board reversed the hearings referee. Thereafter the circuit court reversed the Board and reinstated the order of the referee. … See, Palm Gardens, Inc. v. OLCC, 15 Or App 20 , 514 P2d 888 , Sup Ct review denied (1974). We agree with the Board’s conclusions.

Sothras v. Employment Division

48 Or. App. 69 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 2, 1980

One of these two Board members, relying on our decision in Arias v. … In McPherson v.

Jackson County v. Wehren

186 Or. App. 555 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 19, 2003

Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200, 206 , 752 P2d 312 (1988). Before this court, employer renews its attack on the board’s acceptance of Grant’s opinion instead of Thompson’s. … Palmer v. SAIF, 78 Or App 151, 157 , 714 P2d 1102 (1986).

Wise v. Hays

74 Or. App. 245 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 3, 1985

See Esperum v. Board of Parole, 296 Or 789 , 681 P2d 1128 (1984); Harris v. Board of Parole, 47 Or App 289 , 614 P2d 602 , rev den 290 Or 157 (1980); ORS 144.335. … State ex rel LeVasseur v. Merten, 297 Or 577, 580 , 686 P2d 366 (1984). Having failed to seek judicial review of the Board’s order, plaintiff is not now entitled to relief by writ of mandamus. Rosboro Lumber Co. v.

State v. Kennedy

45 Or. App. 911 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 14, 1980

In State v. … As we observed in State v. Evans, 16 Or.

SAIF Corp. v. Banderas

252 Or. App. 136 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 29, 2012

See Office Depot, Inc. v. … ); Roseburg Forest Products v.

Amfac, Inc. v. Garcia-Maciel

98 Or. App. 88 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 30, 1989

v. under ORS 656.298(1). … Gooderham v. AFSD, 64 Or App 104, 109 , 667 P2d 551 (1983).

Vip's Restaurant v. Krause

89 Or. App. 214 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 13, 1988

We agree with the Board’s determination and conclude that employer was required to pay benefits for temporary total disability through the date of the June 6,1986, determination order. As we held in Noffsinger v. … SAIF v. Maddox, 295 Or 448, 454 , 667 P2d 529 (1983).