Case law

Matter of Compensation of Bahler

60 Or. App. 90 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 27, 1982

Reed v. Del Chemical, 26 Or App 733 , 554 P2d 586 , rev den 276 Or 387 (1976), cert den 429 US 1110 (1977). ORS 656.382(2) is triggered when, as here, the compensability of a claim is at issue. … Mobley v. SAIF, 58 Or App 394 , 648 P2d 1357 (1982).

SAIF Corp. v. Camarena

264 Or. App. 400 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 23, 2014

Uris v. … In SAIF v.

Boydston v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.

166 Or. App. 336 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 22, 2000

Until an order becomes final, we concluded, the Board’s authority to abate and to reconsider its own order was unrestrained. Id. at 291-92 . Lyday v. Liberty Northwest Ins. … Corp. v. Allenby, 166 Or App 331 , 1 P3d 464 (2000), the Board reconsidered a portion of its conclusion in this case and reversed itself.

State v. Skinner

5 Or. App. 259 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 25, 1971

See State v. Miller, supra. In Porter v. … Similarly, in United States ex rel Stoner v.

Vip's Restaurant v. Krause

89 Or. App. 214 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 13, 1988

We agree with the Board’s determination and conclude that employer was required to pay benefits for temporary total disability through the date of the June 6,1986, determination order. As we held in Noffsinger v. … SAIF v. Maddox, 295 Or 448, 454 , 667 P2d 529 (1983).

Barber v. George

144 Or. App. 370 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 13, 1996

They cite Brown v. … Moreover, Brown is distinguishable on legal principles from the doctrine as it is recognized in Oregon.

Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19

25 Or. App. 407 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 17, 1976

Assn v. Sch. Dist., 24 Or App 751 , 547 P2d 647 (1976), and our opinion in Sutherlin Ed. Assn v. Sch. … In Sutherlin we held that the Employment Relations Board (ERB) erred in holding that the statutory duty of a local school board to promulgate student discipline rules consistent with those promulgated by the State Board of

Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co. v. Frazer

252 Or. App. 726 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 17, 2012

-Domino’s v. … See McTaggart v.

Hill v. Employment Department

238 Or. App. 330 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 27, 2010

An employee is disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits if the employee has been “discharged for misconduct connected with work” or has “[v]oluntarily left work without good cause.” … Employer appealed to the board. The board reversed, concluding that claimant voluntarily left work *335 without good cause.

Henthorn v. Grand Prairie School District No. 14

39 Or. App. 351 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 19, 1979

The provision as amended in 1975 may or may not reflect a reaction to this court’s opinion in Hawkins v. … Hill v. State, 23 Or 446 , 32 P 168 (1893). Plaintiff’s proceeding is therefore independent of ORS 342.835 3 and must rest on its justiciability under ORS 34.010-.100.

Dynea USA, Inc. v. Fairbanks

241 Or. App. 311 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 2, 2011

See also Dethlefs v. … .”); K-Mart v.

Jones v. Oregon State Correctional Institution

107 Or. App. 78 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 24, 1991

In *81 Greenslitt v. … Shoulders v. SAIF, 300 Or 606, 611-12 , 716 P2d 751 (1986).

State v. Furrillo

274 Or. App. 612 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 4, 2015

State v. Bennett / McCall, 265 Or App 448, 455 , 338 P3d 143 (2014) (citing State v. Brown, *615 301 Or 268, 276 , 721 P2d 1357 (1986)). … State v. Smalley, 233 Or App 263, 267 , 225 P3d 844 , rev den, 348 Or 415 (2010); see also Brown, 301 Or at 279 .

State v. Williams

178 Or. App. 52 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 14, 2001

In State v. … Brown, 31 Or App at 503 .

Willamina Education Ass'n v. Willamina School District 30J

50 Or. App. 195 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 3, 1981

The standard of review applied by this Board is that enunciated by the National Labor Relations Board in Spielberg Manufacturing Co. and its progeny, adopted by this Board in Siegel v. … "The tests applied in deciding whether or not this Board should defer to a prior arbitration award in unfair labor practice cases are found in Siegal [sic] v. Gresham Grade Teachers Association, Case No.

State Ex Rel. Dwyer v. Dwyer

69 Or. App. 56 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 11, 1984

State v. Kennedy, 295 Or 260, 262 , 666 P2d 1316 (1983); State v. Caraher, 293 Or 741, 752 , 653 P2d 942 (1982). Defendant relies primarily on Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. … Brown concludes that, although a number of factors are relevant, none is conclusive.

Meier & Frank Co. v. Smith-Sanders

115 Or. App. 159 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 9, 1992

Marshall v. Wilson, 175 Or 506, 518 , 154 P2d 547 (1944). ‘The doctrine of estoppel is only intended to protect those who materially change their position in reliance upon another’s acts or representations.’ Bash v. … Eastmoreland Hospital v. Reeves, 94 Or App 698, 702 , 767 P2d 97 (1989).

Castro v. Maass

139 Or. App. 69 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 7, 1996

State of Oregon, 322 Or 101, 108 , 902 P2d 1137 (1995) (quoting Trujillo v. Maass, 312 Or 431, 435 , 822 P2d 703 (1991)). … Yeager v. Maass, 93 Or App 561, 564 , 763 P2d 184 (1988), rev den 307 Or 340 (1989). We conclude that it was not.

Furnish v. Montavilla Lumber Co.

124 Or. App. 622 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 17, 1993

The Board order must “clearly and precisely state what it found to be the facts and fully explain why those facts lead it to the decision it makes. ’ ’ Home Plate, Inc. v. OLCC, supra, 20 Or App at 190 . … The order must state “a reasoned opinion based on explicit findings of fact. ’ ’ Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200, 205 , 752 P2d 312 (1988).

Crawford v. SAIF Corp.

241 Or. App. 470 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 16, 2011

SAIF v. Allen, 320 Or 192, 200 , 881 P2d 773 (1994). … As such, “[w]e review the board’s evaluation of [the] medical evidence for substantial evidence.” Young v. Hermiston Good Samaritan, 223 Or App 99, 107 , 194 P3d 857 (2008). On this record, that standard is satisfied.