Case law

State v. Taylor

315 Or. App. 608 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 17, 2021

Brown, 217 Or App at 335. … Indeed, as noted, we understand the state’s primary argument to be based on a true-plan theory under Turnidge and Brown. 7 In State v.

Holmes v. State Accident Insurance Fund

38 Or. App. 145 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 29, 1979

On the merits we agree with the Board that claimant was entitled only to scheduled benefits. Bowman v. Oregon Transfer Company, 33 Or App 241 , 576 P2d 27 (1978). … See, Derenco v. Benj. Franklin Fed. Sav. and Loan, 281 Or 533 , 577 P2d 477 (1978); Hall v. Northwest Outward Bound School, 280 Or 655 , 572 P2d 1007 (1977); and Joseph v. Lowery, 261 Or 545 , 495 P2d 273 (1972).

SAIF Corp. v. Walker

260 Or. App. 327 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 26, 2013

See SAIF v. … .”); SAIF v.

SAIF Corp. v. Massari (In re Massari)

291 Or. App. 349 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 18, 2018

See Krushwitz v. … Andrews v.

DiNicola v. Service Employees International Union, Local 503

281 Or. App. 706 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 19, 2016

See Or Laws 1989, ch 1010; Lorntsen v. … In Schramm v.

Tektronix, Inc. v. Nazari

117 Or. App. 409 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 30, 1992

See Olson v. State Ind. Acc. Com., 222 Or 407 , 352 P2d 1096 (1960); Destael v. Nicolai Co., 80 Or App 596 , 723 P2d 348 (1986). … Albany General Hospital v. Gasperino, 113 Or App 411 , 833 P2d 1292 (1992).

Hibbs v. Sedgwick CMS (A180280)

340 Or. App. 421 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 14, 2025

Weyerhaeuser Co. v. … In Icenhower v.

Long v. SAIF Corp.

278 Or. App. 88 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 4, 2016

SAIF responds that the board’s order is supported by substantial evidence and reason, and we agree. Agency orders, including orders of the board, must be supported by substantial evidence and reason. Jenkins v. … Board of Parole, 356 Or 186, 195-96 , 335 P3d 828 (2014); Walker v. Providence Health System Oregon, 254 Or App 676, 686 , 298 P3d 38 , rev den, 353 Or 714 (2013).

Wasco County v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Local No. 2752

46 Or. App. 859 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 30, 1980

The rationale of the rule was explained by the Supreme Court in Labor Board v. … , e.g., Marbet v.

SAIF Corp. v. Wart

192 Or. App. 505 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 24, 2004

See Schuler v. … See Schoch v.

Reynolds v. USF Reddaway, Inc.

283 Or. App. 21 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 21, 2016

Corp. v. … See also Yi v.

Chase v. Schleuning

83 Or. App. 149 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 17, 1986

We decided that question adversely to plaintiffs position in Brown v. Portland School Dist. # 1, 48 Or App 571 , 617 P2d 665 (1980), rev’d on other grounds 291 Or 77 , 628 P2d 1183 (1981). … In addition to the equal privileges argument, Brown also involved the question of whether the plaintiffs notice complied with the statute. We held that it did not.

State v. Galloway

294 Or. App. 345 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 10, 2018

In State v. … See State v.

Zandbergen v. Johnson

24 Or. App. 151 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 19, 1976

SAIF, 261 Or 117 , 492 P2d 472 (1972); Nollen v. SAIF, 23 Or App 420 , 542 P2d 932 (1975); Schneider v. Emanuel Hospital, 20 Or App 599 , 532 P2d 1146 , Sup Ct review denied (1975); Stevens v. … SAIF, 20 Or App 412 , 531 P2d 921 (1975); Murphy v. SAIF, 13 Or App 105 , 508 P2d 227 (1973); and Burkholder v. SAIF, 11 Or App 334 , 502 P2d 1394 (1972).

Volk v. America West Airlines

135 Or. App. 565 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 26, 1995

The Board went on to conclude, relying on our decisions in Johnson v. Capitol Car Wash, 127 Or App 49 , 871 P2d 473 (1994), and Lebanon Plywood v. … Claimant argues that the Board’s reliance on Lebanon Plywood v. Seiber and Johnson v. Capitol Car Wash was misplaced and that the Board abused its discretion in failing to apply the provisions of OAR 438-15-085(2).

Frady v. Morrow

169 Or. App. 250 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 2, 2000

See State v. … See Godleske v.

Employer Solutions Staffing Group v. SAIF

343 Or. App. 206 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 4, 2025

Montez v. … Keenon v.

Employer Solutions Staffing Group v. SAIF

343 Or. App. 206 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 4, 2025

Montez v. … Keenon v.

TETON INDUSTRIES, INC. v. Employment Division

26 Or. App. 725 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 13, 1976

Compensation Com. v. Brown, 225 Or 306, 309 , 358 P2d 502 (1960); *731 (2) the individual’s providing of transportation, Rahoutis v. … Brown, supra, 225 Or at 308 ; (9) the individual’s having his own clientele, Unemp. Compensation Com. v. Brown, supra, 225 Or at 309 ; and (10) the individual’s being paid on commission, Kirkpatrick v.

Cayton v. Safelite Glass Corp.

232 Or. App. 454 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 16, 2009

Employer responds that in Red Robin International v. … State v. Gaines, 346 Or 160, 171-72, 175 , 206 P3d 1042 (2009).