Case law

Tektronix, Inc. v. Nazari

117 Or. App. 409 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 30, 1992

See Olson v. State Ind. Acc. Com., 222 Or 407 , 352 P2d 1096 (1960); Destael v. Nicolai Co., 80 Or App 596 , 723 P2d 348 (1986). … Albany General Hospital v. Gasperino, 113 Or App 411 , 833 P2d 1292 (1992).

Kercher v. Employment Department

250 Or. App. 409 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 13, 2012

Young v. Employment Dept., 170 Or App 752, 756 , 13 P3d 1027 (2000). … Stevenson v. Morgan, 17 Or App 428, 433 , 522 P2d 1204 (1974).

Strutz v. Employment Department

247 Or. App. 439 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 29, 2011

Accordingly, the board’s first conclusion is not supported by substantial reason. See Bremer v. … Westrope v. Employment Dept., 144 Or App 163, 170 , 925 P2d 587 (1996). Here, the board failed to do so. Accordingly, the board’s second conclusion also is not supported by substantial reason.

Burnett v. Lampert

173 Or. App. 577 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 25, 2001

As we noted in Weidner v. Armenakis, 154 Or App 12, 18 , 959 P2d 623 (1998), withdrawn by order July 13, 1998, reasoning reaffirmed and readopted in Merrill v. … See Bagby v.

Wiggins v. SAIF

300 Or. App. 319 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 30, 2019

As we recently recounted in Broeke v. SAIF, 300 Or App 91, 453 P3d 597 (2019), in Spurger v. … We draw them from the undisputed portions of the board’s order, supplementing with additional undisputed facts drawn from the evidence in the record. Robin v.

Shearer's Foods v. Hoffnagle

284 Or. App. 859 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 19, 2017

See, e.g., Barnes v. … Oak Crest Care Center v. Bond, 101 Or App 15 , 17 n 1, 789 P2d 6 , rev den, 310 Or 121 (1990). Employer also contends that its position is borne out by our decision in TriMet v.

Campbell v. State

254 Or. App. 726 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 30, 2013

See Erbs v. Board of Parole, 90 Or App 253, 255 , 752 P2d 318 (1988) (describing good-time calculation process). … He argues that our decision in Shelby v. Board of Parole, 244 Or App 348 , 260 P3d 682 , rev den, 351 Or 507 (2011), supports his position; the board argues in response that Shelby supports its position.

Bremer v. Employment Division

52 Or. App. 293 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 18, 1981

.’ * * * In the case of Bremer v. … See, e.g., Sothras v. Emp. Div., 48 Or App 69 , 616 P2d 524 (1980).

SAIF Corp. v. Wart

192 Or. App. 505 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 24, 2004

See Schuler v. … See Schoch v.

State v. O'KEY

123 Or. App. 54 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 1, 1993

See OAR 257-25-020(1); State v. Scott, 121 Or App 308 , 854 P2d 991 (1993). … Defendant argues that, when the factors listed in State v. Brown, supra, are used to evaluate the HGN test results in this case, the results are not admissible.

Fister v. South Hills Health Care

149 Or. App. 214 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 16, 1997

Planned Parenthood Assn. v. Dept. of Human Res., 297 Or 562 , 687 P2d 785 (1984). In State v. … See also Meltebeke v. Bureau of Labor and Industries, 322 Or 132 , 903 P2d 351 (1995). In Lloyd Corporation v.

Pacheco-Gonzalez v. SAIF Corp.

123 Or. App. 312 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 22, 1993

We intended to make it clear in Benzinger v. Oregon Dept. of Ins. and Finance, supra, that the reconsideration process before DIF was to be concluded within the statutory time limit. … relied on Anaconda Company v.

SAIF Corp. v. DeMarco

271 Or. App. 226 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 13, 2015

See SAIF v. Durant, 271 Or App 216, 220 , 350 P3d 489 (2015); see also SAIF v. … In support of its conclusion, SAIF relies on Murdoch v.

Miller v. SAIF Corp. (In re Miller)

293 Or. App. 74 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 25, 2018

See Jewell v. SAIF , 291 Or. … LP Company v. Disdero Structural , 118 Or. App. 36 , 40, 845 P.2d 1305 (1993) ; see also Smirnoff v. SAIF , 188 Or.

Lincoln County School District v. Mayer

39 Or. App. 99 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 5, 1979

Thompson v. Secretary of State, 19 Or App 74, 80 , 526 P2d 621 , rev den (1974). Cf. Phillips v. State Bd. of Higher Ed., 7 Or App 588 , 490 P2d 1005 (1971) rev den (1972). … Tupper v. Fairview Hospital, 276 Or 657 , 556 P2d 1340 (1977).

Frady v. Morrow

169 Or. App. 250 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 2, 2000

See State v. … See Godleske v.

Zandbergen v. Johnson

24 Or. App. 151 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 19, 1976

SAIF, 261 Or 117 , 492 P2d 472 (1972); Nollen v. SAIF, 23 Or App 420 , 542 P2d 932 (1975); Schneider v. Emanuel Hospital, 20 Or App 599 , 532 P2d 1146 , Sup Ct review denied (1975); Stevens v. … SAIF, 20 Or App 412 , 531 P2d 921 (1975); Murphy v. SAIF, 13 Or App 105 , 508 P2d 227 (1973); and Burkholder v. SAIF, 11 Or App 334 , 502 P2d 1394 (1972).

Saif Corp. v. Siegrist (In re Comp. of Siegrist)

297 Or. App. 284 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 24, 2019

See Simonsen v. Ford Motor Co. , 196 Or. … Simplot Co. v.

SAIF Corp. v. Walker

260 Or. App. 327 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 26, 2013

See SAIF v. … .”); SAIF v.

State v. Thomas

99 Or. App. 32 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 18, 1989

Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. Ct., 280 Or. 95 , 570 P.2d 52 (1977). … See, e.g., State v. Mendez, 308 Or. 9, 19 , 774 P.2d 1082 (1989); State v. Barfield, 79 Or. App. 688, 691 , 720 P.2d 394 (1986).