Case law

SAIF v. Sumner

313 Or. App. 434 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 21, 2021

ORS 183.482(8); Compton v. SAIF Corp., 195 Or App 329, 333, 97 P3d 669, rev den, 337 Or 669 (2004). We review the board’s find- ings for substantial evidence and substantial reason. … See SAIF v.

SAIF Corp. v. DeLeon

241 Or. App. 614 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 23, 2011

We agree with SAIF that ORS 656.382(2), as interpreted by this court in Santos v. Caryall Transport, 171 Or App 467, 469 , 17 P3d 509 (2000), rev den, 332 Or 558 (2001) (Santos II), and SAIF v. … Claimant appealed the ALJ’s order to the Workers’ Compensation Board, and the board reversed the ALJ, reinstating the 11 percent award.

Rogers v. CorVel Enterprise Comp, Inc.

317 Or. App. 116 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 20, 2022

Coday v. … See Seeley v.

T. M. E. v. Strope

307 Or. App. 156 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 7, 2020

E. v. … v.

Liles v. Damon Corp.

210 Or. App. 303 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 27, 2006

v. … Brown, 291 Or at 82-83 .

State v. Paquin

55 Or. App. 676 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 25, 1982

In State v. … However, doubt has been cast on the suggestion in Brown that the joinder requirement is of constitutional origin. See State v.

Krisor v. Henry

256 Or. App. 56 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 3, 2013

Kay v. David Douglas Sch. Dist. … That complaint and its outcome are not relevant to this case, but figure in Krisor v. Lake County Fair Board (A149432), currently under advisement in this court. In Yancy v.

State v. Hartley

96 Or. App. 722 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 24, 1989

See State v. Brown, supra . … See State v. Brown, 301 Or. 268 , 721 P.2d 1357 (1986).

Marcum v. Adventist Health System/West

215 Or. App. 166 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 26, 2007

See State v. O’Key, 321 Or 285 , 899 P2d 663 (1995); State v. Brown, 297 Or 404 , 687 P2d 751 (1984). … Brown, 297 Or at 417 . 8 Those factors “are guidelines, not a checklist.” State v. St. Hilaire, 97 Or App 108, 112 , 775 P2d 876 (1989).

State v. Nguyen

293 Or. App. 492 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 22, 2018

See State v. Hobbs , 218 Or. App. 298 , 309, 179 P.3d 682 , rev. den. , 345 Or. 175 , 190 P.3d 1237 (2008). … (citing State v. Davis , 336 Or. 19 , 32, 77 P.3d 1111 (2003) ).

SAIF Corp. v. Owens

247 Or. App. 402 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 29, 2011

In Hicks v. … Libbett v.

Rivas v. Persson

256 Or. App. 829 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 30, 2013

Citing Hamel v. … The second case that informs our analysis is Janowski/Fleming v. Board of Parole, 349 Or 432 , 245 P3d 1270 (2010).

State v. Alexander

44 Or. App. 557 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 19, 1980

That test is set out in State v. Brown, supra, and is used customarily to determine when multiple charges must be joined in a single trial. ORS 131.515(2), supra, note 6; see also State v. … State v. Brown, supra, 262 Or at 446, n 10 . "15.

SAIF v. Krusenstjerna

346 Or. App. 429 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 7, 2026

Providence Health System v. … On this record then, the board opinion lacks sub- stantial evidence and substantial reason. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp. v.

Evans v. Schrunk

4 Or. App. 437 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 28, 1971

The circuit court correctly tried the Writ on the record made by and brought from the Board. See Wing v. City of Eugene, 249 Or 367, 371 , 437 P2d 836 (1968). … Schrunk, 242 Or 196 , 409 P2d 177 (1965); Hicks v. Schrunk, 238 Or 181 , 393 P2d 771 (1964); Miller v. Schrunk et al, 232 Or 383 , 375 P2d 823 (1962); City of Portland v.

Davis v. O'Brien

128 Or. App. 428 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 8, 1994

Plaintiff argued that Mills v. Brown, 303 Or 223 , 735 P2d 603 (1987), precluded the jury’s consideration of such evidence and arguments. … Plaintiff objected to this proposed form of judgment, arguing that Mills v. Brown, supra, precluded a reduction of defendants’ liability based on the proportionate fault of a settling joint tortfeasor.

Andrews v. Sandpiper Villagers, Inc.

215 Or. App. 656 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 31, 2007

Id,.; see also Bachmeier v. … Staffordshire Investments, Inc. v. Cal-Western, 209 Or App 528, 535-36 , 149 P3d 150 (2006) (citing Kabil Developments Corp. v. Mignot, 279 Or 151, 157-58 , 566 P2d 505 (1977)).

SAIF Corp. v. Swartz

247 Or. App. 515 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 29, 2011

After remand, the board allowed the claim for gastric bypass surgery, and SAIF and the employer sought review. We affirmed the board, SAIF v. … .”); Counts v.

State Ex Rel. Engweiler v. Powers

232 Or. App. 214 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 25, 2009

Engweiler v. … Miller v.

Cascadia Wildlands v. Or. Dep't of State Lands

293 Or. App. 127 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 1, 2018

Dist. et al. v. … See also, e.g ., State Land Board v.