Case law

Monson v. State

136 Or. App. 225 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 6, 1995

See Brown v. J. C. Penney Co., 297 Or 695, 705 , 688 P2d 811 (1984); Sivers v. R & F Capital Corp., 123 Or App 35, 37 , 858 P2d 895 (1993), rev den 318 Or 351 (1994). … See Garrett v. State Farm Mutual Ins.

Fechtig v. City of Albany

150 Or. App. 28 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 17, 1997

See Fechtig 1, 150 Or App at 13-14 ; Broyles v. Estate of Brown, 295 Or 795, 800-01 , 671 P2d 94 (1983). … See, e.g., OEA v. Roberts, 301 Or 228 , 721 P2d 833 (1986), and OEA v.

Nicoll v. City of Eugene

53 Or. App. 528 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 17, 1981

See Miles v. City of Eugene, 252 Or 528 , 451 P2d 59 (1969). The definition of 'eligible customer’ in the plan includes a 'person who owns or occupies a residential building * * *.’ … The only point the footnote was intended to make is that, if the plan does benefit companies, corporations or associations as well as natural persons, the holding in Miles v.

Morgan v. Sisters School District 6

241 Or. App. 483 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 16, 2011

E.g., Eckles v. … Accord Hinkley v.

State v. Riggs

35 Or. App. 571 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 2, 1978

As will appear, we find the principles of Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. Ct., supra, applicable in this proceeding. … In Brown v. Multnomah County Dist.

Cloyd v. Lebanon School District 16C

161 Or. App. 572 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 7, 1999

Maddox v. Clac. Co. Sch. Dist. No. 25, 293 Or 27 , 643 P2d 1253 (1982); *578 Machunze v. Chemeketa Community College, 106 Or App 707, 709-14 , 810 P2d 406 (1991); Cole v. … Crampton v. Harmon, 20 Or App 676, 683 , 533 P2d 364 (1975).

Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs v. Deschutes Cty.

Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 1, 2024

Shirzad, Garrett Brown, and David J. … State v.

Tanner v. Oregon Health Sciences University

157 Or. App. 502 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 9, 1998

Barcik v. Kubiaczyk, 321 Or 174, 186 , 859 P2d 765 (1995). The exercise of judicial power requires a concrete controversy that results in a decree that binds parties having adverse legal interests. Brown v. … In Public Employees v.

Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District

170 Or. App. 271 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 4, 2000

Johnson v. Civil Service Board, 161 Or App 489, 500 , 985 P2d 854 , on recons 162 Or App 527 , 986 P2d 666 (1999). … Petitioner, however, raised the issue of whether the Board misconstrued ORS 279.015. See Northwest Natural Gas Co. v. Chase Gardens, Inc., 328 Or 487, 500-01 , 982 P2d 1117 (1999); Stull v.

State v. Kambra

93 Or. App. 156 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 14, 1988

In State v. Marquette, 39 Or App 519 , 592 P2d 1062 (1979), the first prosecution was for assault and the second was for driving while under the influence of intoxicants (DUII). After noting that, under Brown v. … It meets none of the criteria that the Brown court used to determine the criminal nature of a DUII charge. Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. Ct., supra, 280 Or at 102 .

Groener v. Oregon Government Ethics Commission

59 Or. App. 459 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 29, 1982

v. … Megdal v. Board of Dental Examiners,, supra, 288 Or at 304-05 . (Citation omitted.)

State v. Flores

58 Or. App. 437 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 4, 1982

New York v. … Both the brown paper bag and the box were open containers and were subject to search as part of the search of the car incident to defendant’s arrest. Cf. United States v.

State v. Marquette

39 Or. App. 519 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 2, 1979

The answer requires an analysis of Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. … v.

State v. Huddleston

5 Or. App. 9 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 11, 1971

The applicable rule was clearly and concisely set out in State v. … State v. Brown, 89 Adv Sh 741, — Or App —, 461 P2d 836 (1969); State v.

Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs v. Deschutes Cty.

Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 1, 2024

Shirzad, Garrett Brown, and David J. … State v.

State v. Ellis

14 Or. App. 84 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 16, 1973

I refer to State v. Brown. * * *” ① The court thereupon dismissed the burglary indictment “with prejudice.” … . * * Affirmed. ① State v. Brown, 262 Or 442 , 497 P2d 1191 (1972). ② For a discussion of what constitutes the same transaction, see State v.

State v. Evans

236 Or. App. 467 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 4, 2010

Brown, 297 Or 404 , 687 P2d 751 (1984). … Under O’Key and Brown , “scientific evidence” is admissible if it is relevant under OEC 401, helpful to the trier of fact under OEC 702, 1 and not subject to exclusion under OEC 403. In State v.

State v. Ayers

16 Or. App. 655 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 18, 1974

One justice dissented on the grounds that *660 he did not agree with State v. Brown, supra, in which he had also dissented. … As the state points out in its brief the revisers of the new criminal procedure code were aware of both State v. Brown, supra, and State v.

Association of Oregon Corrections Employees v. State

266 Or. App. 496 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 22, 2014

E.g., Koller v. Veterinary Medical Examining Board, 243 Or App 639 , 258 P3d 1285 (2011). … E.g., Brundridge v. Board of Parole, 192 Or App 648, 656-57 , 87 P3d 703 , rev den, 337 Or 327 (2004).

State v. Rook

14 Or. App. 211 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 16, 1973

Although our Supreme Court in State v. Fair, 263 Or 383 , 502 P2d 1150 (1972), held that State v. Brown, supra, was not to be applied retroactively, defendant contends that Fair was in effect overruled by Robinson v. … In State v.