Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersorctapp

10,000+ results

0.43s

  • Hall v. Boyles

    85 Or. App. 583 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 3, 1987

    Dry Canyon Farms v. U.S. National Bank of Oregon, 84 Or App 686 , 735 P2d 620 (1987); see also Reynolds v. State Board of Naturopathic Exam., 80 Or App 438 , 722 P2d 739 (1986). In Brown v. … Reynolds v. State Board of Naturopathic Exam., supra. Reversed and remanded. E. R. Boyles is also known as Richard E. Boyles and as Elva Richard Boyles. We shall refer to him as “husband.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Rector

    82 Or. App. 466 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 19, 1986

    See, e.g., State v. Classen, supra; State v. Bush, 29 Or App 315 , 563 P2d 747 (1977); State v. McBain, 24 Or App 737 , 547 P2d 188 , rev den (1976). … on State v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Carpet Mill & Lighthouse v. Employment Division

    56 Or. App. 552 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 22, 1982

    See Kirkpatrick v. Peet, supra; Sharp v. Employment Division, 47 Or App 733 , 615 P2d 374 , rev den 290 Or 211 (1980). … There was evidence on each of those factors. (4) Dave Brown had two or more effective contracts or held himself out as a contractor.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State v. George

    287 Or. App. 312 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 23, 2017

    In State v. … Recently, in State v. Andersen, 361 Or 187, 197 , 390 P3d 992 (2017), the court reaffirmed the automobile exception that it recognized in Brown 30 years earlier and the requirement that it articulated in State v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Branch

    243 Or. App. 309 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 1, 2011

    Defendant argued to the court that the state had failed to satisfy the factors delineated in State v. Brown, 297 Or 404 , 687 P2d 751 (1984), and State v. … v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • State v. Olinger

    240 Or. App. 215 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 29, 2010

    However, if Brown’s entry onto that area of the curtilage was not pursuant to defendant’s implied consent, his intrusion was a trespass, and thus a search in violation of Article I, section 9. City of Eugene v. … See Ball v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State v. Ross

    199 Or. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 13, 2005

    Defendant argues that the testimony of the two witnesses constituted scientific evidence and, therefore, under the Supreme Court’s holdings in State v. Brown, 297 Or 404 , 687 P2d 751 (1984), and State v. … See State v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State v. Garcia

    272 Or. App. 179 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 1, 2015

    Myrick (A158004) Gines, Dennis L. v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (A156957) Lopez-Daniel, Olegario v. Premo (A152909) State v. Al-Khafagi, Jabbar Sachet (A155956/57) State v. … Employment Department et al (A158374) Dillard, Carvel Gordon v. Brown (A156060), rev den, 358 Or 248 Gramajo, Eber v. Nooth (A153417), rev den, 358 Or 69 Hamilton, Albert L. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Studor, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Dcbs

    224 Or. App. 299 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 3, 2008

    Council v. Oregon State Bd. of Ed., 307 Or 30 , 761 P2d 1322 (1988). … Grobovsky v. Board of Medical Examiners, 213 Or App 136, 143 , 159 P3d 1245 (2007). Here, Studor sought to have its *307 proposal incorporated into the 2005 revision of the state building code.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brenner v. Nooth

    283 Or. App. 868 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 23, 2017

    State v. Perry, 347 Or 110, 121 , 218 P3d 95 (2009) (quoting Brown, 297 Or at 417 (internal citations and. footnotes omitted)). … State v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State v. Zigler

    100 Or. App. 700 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 14, 1990

    In State v. … State v. Brown, supra, 301 Or at 274 . The car was mobile when the police pulled it over, so the exception can apply. State v. Kosta, 304 Or 549, 555 , 748 P2d 72 (1987); State v. Brown, supra, 301 Or at 277-78 .

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • MacHunze v. Chemeketa Community College

    106 Or. App. 707 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 24, 1991

    In Cole v. … See Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 US 564 , 92 S Ct 2701 , 33 L Ed 2d 548 (1972); Perry *715 v. Sindermann, 408 US 593 , 92 S Ct 2694 , 33 L Ed 2d 570 (1972).

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • White v. Employment Division

    77 Or. App. 35 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 18, 1985

    On review of a decision of the Employment Appeals Board which disqualified him from unemployment compensation benefits, petitioner prevailed on the merits in this court. White v. … In discussing ORS 183.495, the companion statute to ORS 183.497, the Supreme Court in Brown v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Payne v. Department of Commerce, Building Codes Division

    62 Or. App. 433 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 26, 1883

    Petitioner Employment Relations Board (ERB) seeks Supreme Court review of our decision in this case, Payne v. … Sunshine Dairy v. Peterson, 183 Or 305 , 193 P2d 543 (1948); Clackamas County v. LCDC, supra.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Laro Lumber Co., Inc. v. Patrick

    52 Or. App. 1035 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 29, 1981

    Broadcast, v. … Pendleton Grain Gr. v. Sunbest Corp., 271 Or 48, 54 , 530 P2d 82 (1975); see Brown v. Portland School District # 1, 291 Or 77 , 628 P2d 1183 (1981).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State v. Colman-Pinning

    302 Or. App. 383 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 26, 2020

    Brown, 301 Or at 276; State v. Andersen, 361 Or 187, 200-01, 390 P3d 992 (2017). … See State v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Tanner v. Oregon Health Sciences University

    157 Or. App. 502 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 9, 1998

    Barcik v. Kubiaczyk, 321 Or 174, 186 , 859 P2d 765 (1995). The exercise of judicial power requires a concrete controversy that results in a decree that binds parties having adverse legal interests. Brown v. … In Public Employees v.

    Cited 55 timesPublished
  • State v. Sanchez

    14 Or. App. 234 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 16, 1973

    For double jeopardy purposes, State v. … State v. Brown, supra, requires that separate charges arising from the same transaction be joined for trial. Brown did not elaborate on what constitutes a transaction for this purpose.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • State v. Dulfu

    282 Or. App. 209 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 16, 2016

    Brown, 297 Or at 417 . … In Orchard v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • City of Portland v. Bureau of Labor & Industries

    61 Or. App. 182 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 29, 1982

    ORS 174.020; 5 Thompson v. IDS Life Ins. Co., 274 Or 649 , 549 P2d 510 (1976). … Gaudry v. Bureau of Labor & Ind., 48 Or App 589, 593 , 617 P2d 668 (1980).

    Modified by City of Portland v. Bureau of Labor & Industries, 64 Or. App. 341 (1983)Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.