Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersorctapp

10,000+ results

0.93s

  • State v. Henley

    310 Or. App. 813 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 21, 2021

    On remand, the trial court held a Brown/O’Key hearing. See State v. O’Key, 321 Or 285, 899 P2d 663 (1995); State v. Brown, 297 Or 404, 687 P2d 751 (1984). … In Marcum v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State v. Matischeck

    20 Or. App. 332 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 10, 1975

    This appeal presents another double jeopardy *334 problem under the holding of State v. Brown, 262 Or 442 , 497 P2d 1191 (1972). … In State v.

    Modified by State v. Matischeck, 21 Or. App. 300 (1975)Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Handam v. Wilsonville Holiday Partners, LLC

    225 Or. App. 442 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 28, 2009

    Rathgeber v. *445 James Hemenway, Inc., 335 Or 404, 411 , 69 P3d 710 (2003); Brown v. J. C. Penney Co., 297 Or 695, 705 , 688 P2d 811 (1984). … Holien, 298 Or at 90 ; see Brown / Shidler v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State v. Andersen

    269 Or. App. 705 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 18, 2015

    Three months after Brown , the court considered in State v. … The Supreme Court next confronted the reach of the Oregon automobile exception twenty years after Brown and Kock in State v. Meharry, 342 Or 173 , 149 P3d 1155 (2006).

    Reversed by State v. Andersen, 361 Or. 187 (2017)Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Thorson v. State

    171 Or. App. 704 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 27, 2000

    Co. v. Globe Seed & Feed Co., Inc., 125 Or App 321, 327 , 865 P2d 451 (1993), rev den 318 Or 458 , 871 P2d 122 (1994); Scholes v. Sipco Services & Marine, Inc., 103 Or App 503, 506 , 798 P2d 694 (1990). … Borough v. D.G. Averill Trucking, 151 Or App 723, 725 , 951 P2d 202 (1997). However, an at-will employee may not be terminated for “fulfilling an important societal obligation.” Id.; see also Delaney v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State v. Fuller

    252 Or. App. 391 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 26, 2012

    Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. … See State v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State v. Norris

    188 Or. App. 318 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 26, 2003

    By parity of reasoning, Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 US 537 , 16 S Ct 1138 , 41 L Ed 256 (1896), overruled by Brown v. … Kusyk v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Bean v. Cain

    314 Or. App. 529 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 15, 2021

    If active misrepresentation by an attorney does not create an exception, [as the court held in Brown v. … For that reason, this case is more like Keerins v. Schiedler, 132 Or App 560, 562-64, 889 P2d 385 (1995), than it is like Brown.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • State v. Rives

    283 Or. App. 431 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 25, 2017

    He argues that, under the framework for determining the admissibility of eyewitness identifications established in State v. … State v. Hickman, 355 Or 715, 724 , 330 P3d 551 (2014).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Burns

    259 Or. App. 410 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 14, 2013

    The legislature also created the State Sentencing Guidelines Board (the board) to serve *413 as the administrative body that would adopt and promulgate the guidelines in the form of administrative rules. Id,.; State v. … Brown v. Oregon State Bar, 293 Or 446, 449 , 648 P2d 1289 (1982); accord Hazell v. Brown, 352 Or 455, 480 , 287 P3d 1079 (2012).

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • State v. Henderson-Laird

    280 Or. App. 107 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 3, 2016

    State v. … State v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Vanderzanden

    265 Or. App. 752 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 1, 2014

    State v. Brown, 306 Or 599, 606 , 761 P2d 1300 (1988). … State v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Three Rivers Education Ass'n v. Three Rivers School District

    254 Or. App. 570 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 16, 2013

    Assn. v. Lincoln Cty. Sch. Dist., 187 Or App 92, 96 , 67 P3d 951 (2003); Gresham Tchrs. v. Gresham Gr. Sch., 52 Or App 881, 889 , 630 P2d 1304 (1981); Hillsboro Education Association v. … In Cascade Bargaining Council v. Crook County School District, Case No.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Myers v. BD. OF DIR. OF TUALATIN RURAL FIRE

    5 Or. App. 142 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 1, 1971

    Under the Act this was the function of the civil service board which, in this ease, was never appointed as required by the Act. Ahlstedt v. Board of Education, supra. … Corfman v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • State v. Miglavs

    186 Or. App. 420 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 19, 2003

    Brown had backup and was not alone. See State v. … See State v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • State v. Carrol

    54 Or. App. 445 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 26, 1981

    Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., John R. McCulloch, Jr., Sol. Gen., and William F. Gary, Deputy Sol. Gen., Salem. … NOTES [1] Though this presentence procedure did not comply with the statutory requirements of ORS 171.735, see State v. Dodson, 25 Or.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Embick v. Gruber

    45 Or. App. 1075 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 28, 1980

    Lincoln County School Board and inquiring whether the position of defendant remained as set forth in the letter of June 29, 1977. … Brown, Burt & Swanson, P C, 283 Or 5, 9 , 581 P2d 81 (1978) (emphasis supplied).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hall v. Boyles

    85 Or. App. 583 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 3, 1987

    Dry Canyon Farms v. U.S. National Bank of Oregon, 84 Or App 686 , 735 P2d 620 (1987); see also Reynolds v. State Board of Naturopathic Exam., 80 Or App 438 , 722 P2d 739 (1986). In Brown v. … Reynolds v. State Board of Naturopathic Exam., supra. Reversed and remanded. E. R. Boyles is also known as Richard E. Boyles and as Elva Richard Boyles. We shall refer to him as “husband.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Lawson

    127 Or. App. 392 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 20, 1994

    In State v. … See State v. Brown, supra, 297 Or at 407 . Therefore, for the evidence to be admissible, defendant must demonstrate the evidence’s probative value under the test announced in Brown. State v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State v. Rector

    82 Or. App. 466 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 19, 1986

    See, e.g., State v. Classen, supra; State v. Bush, 29 Or App 315 , 563 P2d 747 (1977); State v. McBain, 24 Or App 737 , 547 P2d 188 , rev den (1976). … on State v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.