Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersorctapp

10,000+ results

0.85s

  • Crandon Capital Partners v. Shelk

    219 Or. App. 16 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 26, 2008

    Plaintiffs, Crandon Capital Partners (Crandon) and Rae Ann Brown (Brown), owned shares of Willamette. “In November 2000, Weyerhaeuser offered to purchase all of Willamette’s outstanding shares for $48 per share. … Kahn v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Committee of One Thousand to Re-Elect State Senator Walt Brown v. Eivers

    61 Or. App. 107 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 22, 1982

    Defendant moved for a directed verdict on the ground, among others, that the only evidence established that the allegedly false statements were with regard to Brown, not to plaintiff committee. … Although we are not bound by dictum in Supreme Court cases, the following quotation from a footnote in Comm, to Retain Judge Tanzer v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Koblinski v. Or. State Bd. of Nursing

    295 Or. App. 669 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 9, 2019

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Good Samaritan Hospital v. Stoddard

    126 Or. App. 69 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 19, 1994

    When an agreement is unambiguous, its interpretation is as a matter of law, Timberline Equip, v. St. Paul Fire and Mar. … See Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Seney, 124 Or App 450, 454 , 863 P2d 528 (1993).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • State v. Sweeney

    188 Or. App. 255 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 12, 2003

    State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355 , 800 P2d 259 (1990). The state reasons that, because the Supreme Court has allowed review in Collins, the legal point is still reasonably in dispute. … State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355 , 800 P2d 259 (1990). If the asserted error satisfies those criteria, we then must exercise our discretion in deciding whether to correct the error. Ailes v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Oregon Fire/Police Retirement Committee v. Oregon Public Employes' Retirement Board

    65 Or. App. 465 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 9, 1983

    Respondent, Oregon Public Employes’ Retirement Board (PERB), is a statutorily-created agency charged with the responsibility of managing PERS. ORS 237.263. … Springfield Education Assn. v. School Dist., 290 Or 217 , 621 P2d 547 (1980), held that three different types of terms are in statutes which govern agencies: “1.)

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Hood River Valley Residents' Committee, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners

    193 Or. App. 485 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 2, 2004

    See also Doty v. … Sulliger v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Gadalean v. SAIF Corp.

    286 Or. App. 227 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 14, 2017

    .”); Staley v. … See, e.g., BBC Brown Boveri v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Gritzbaugh Main Street Properties, LLC v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.

    205 Or. App. 640 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 10, 2006

    State v. … See Becker v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Goodman v. SAIF Corp.

    274 Or. App. 316 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 14, 2015

    On review, claimant asserts that, in light of our decision in Brown v. … Id. at 656 ; see also Sather v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gurule v. Board of Parole

    349 Or. App. 798 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 20, 2026

    See Lehman v. … Murphy v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Jones v. Armenakis

    144 Or. App. 23 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 9, 1996

    Nonetheless, defendant argues that here, as we did in Troxel and in Gomez v. … See Penrod/Brown v. Cupp, 283 Or 21, 28 , 581 P2d 934 (1978).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Poddar v. Clatsop County

    167 Or. App. 162 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 10, 2000

    Lone Oak Racing, Inc. v. Oregon Racing Commission, 162 Or App 111, 118 , 986 P2d 596 (1999); Hudson v. Feder, 115 Or App 1 , 5 n 3, 836 P2d 779 , rev den 314 Or 727 (1992). In Brown v. … Brown, 293 Or at 449-50 ; Lone Oak Racing, Inc., 162 Or App at 118 . In Eckles v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Payton v. Thompson

    156 Or. App. 217 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 30, 1998

    Penrod/Brown v. Cupp, 283 Or 21, 28 , 581 P2d 934 (1978). … Jones v. Thompson, 156 Or App 226 , 968 P2d 380 (1998).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Oregon College of Education Federation of Teachers v. Employment Relations Board

    29 Or. App. 39 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 11, 1977

    This is an appeal from an order of the Employment Relations Board (ERB) certifying that no labor organization had been elected by the faculty members of the Oregon College of Education (OCE) to represent them in collective … Furthermore, we have previously interpreted similar State Board of Higher Education regulations to provide there is no authority to discharge below the university president level. Papadopoulos v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Searles v. Board of Parole

    349 Or. App. 642 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 13, 2026

    Dept. of Human Services v. P. D., 368 Or 627, 496 P3d 1029 (2021). … ORS 14.175; Couey v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Johnson v. DESCHUTES COUNTY EX REL. BOARD OF CTY. COMM.

    249 Or. App. 60 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 28, 2012

    The hearings officer explained that, “[i]n Clackamas Co. v. … As the Supreme Court explained in Alt v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Moret v. Board of Parole

    343 Or. App. 600 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 24, 2025

    See Tuckenberry v. … ’s statutory authority,” and (3) it would likely have been “futile” for the inmate to raise the issue before the board); see also Jacobs v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State ex rel. Public Employes' Retirement Board v. City of Portland

    69 Or. App. 117 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 11, 1984

    The Board of Directors shall consist of five Directors appointed by the governing body of the City. … It has 12 employes, whose salaries are set by its board of directors.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • North Clackamas School District No. 12 v. Fair Dismissal Appeals Board

    30 Or. App. 855 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 29, 1977

    Petitioner asserts on appeal that the final order of the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board is internally inconsistent and not supported by substantial evidence. We disagree.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.