Case law

State Ex Rel. State Land Board v. Corvallis Sand & Gravel Co.

18 Or. App. 524 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 9, 1974

Corvallis Sand & Gravel v. Land Board, 250 Or 319 , 439 P2d 575 (1968). … This question has, by implication, been decided adversely to defendant’s claim in Corvallis Sand & Gravel v. Land Board, supra. See also, Lowndes v. Huntington, 153 US 1 , 14 S Ct 758 , 38 L Ed 615 (1894); Bates v.

Weinstein v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

146 Or. App. 551 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 26, 1997

Kessler v. Board of Parole, 145 Or App 584 , 931 P2d 801 (1997).

Lee v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

144 Or. App. 489 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 13, 1996

The Board therefore erred. State v. McFee, 136 Or App 160 , 901 P2d 870 (1995), rev dismissed 323 Or 662 (1996). Petitioner’s other assignment of error is without merit. Gress v. … Board of Parole, 143 Or App 7 , 924 P2d 329 , mod on recons 144 Or App 375 , 927 P2d 138 (1996). Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.

Taylor v. Board of Parole

342 Or. App. 313 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 30, 2025

Reversed and remanded. 314 Taylor v. Board of Parole LAGESEN, C. J. … Watson v. Board of Parole, 329 Or App 13, 21, 540 P3d 20, 25 (2023).

Chandler v. Board of Parole

341 Or. App. 459 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 25, 2025

Reversed and remanded. 460 Chandler v. Board of Parole EGAN, J. … Under our decisions in Thomsen v. Board of Parole, 333 Or App 703, 554 P3d 308, rev den, 373 Or 81 (2024), and Allen v.

The New Portland Meadows v. Dieringer

153 Or. App. 383 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 15, 1998

Based on Silveira v. … In response to insurer’s argument, however, the Board also explained that under this court’s opinion in Beneficiaries of Strametz v.

Chandler v. Board of Parole

341 Or. App. 459 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 25, 2025

Reversed and remanded. 460 Chandler v. Board of Parole EGAN, J. … Under our decisions in Thomsen v. Board of Parole, 333 Or App 703, 554 P3d 308, rev den, 373 Or 81 (2024), and Allen v.

Tillamook County v. State ex rel. State Board of Forestry

75 Or. App. 344 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 25, 1985

This case is distinguishable from Brown v. … State Farm Fire & Cas. v. Reuter, 294 Or 446 , 657 P2d 1231 (1983); Brown v. Oregon State Bar, 293 Or 446 , 648 P2d 1289 (1982).

Eames v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

151 Or. App. 460 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 26, 1997

Luckey v. Board of Parole, 150 Or App 480 , 946 P2d 361 (1997).

Beagle v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

138 Or. App. 181 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 29, 1995

PER CURIAM Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (Board) imposing, pursuant to ORS 144.085(l)(c), a period of supervised parole for pre-guidelines convictions extending … The Board lacked the authority to impose the sentence of supervised parole. Fernandez v. Board of Parole, 137 Or App 247 , 904 P2d 1071 (1995).

Hall v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

138 Or. App. 177 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 29, 1995

Fernandez v. Board of Parole, 137 Or App 247 , 904 P2d 1071 (1995). … Petitioner also argues that the Board’s retroactive application of the sexual offender notification statute to him was a violation of the state and federal ex post facto clauses. We disagree. Williford v.

Leitner v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

137 Or. App. 347 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 18, 1995

Fernandez v. Board of Parole, 137 Or App 247 , 904 P2d 1071 (1995).

Martin v. City of Portland

178 Or. App. 505 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 26, 2001

Browning and, at the request of employer, Dr. Montanero. … Bronco Cleaners v. Velazquez, 141 Or App 295, 297 , 917 P2d 539 (1996). Bronco Cleaners is illustrative.

State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. Peoples

59 Or. App. 593 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 13, 1982

We affirm the court’s modification of the award as to the hearing before the referee and the Board proceeding, and reverse the award for the circuit court proceeding. SAIF relies on Bentley v. … Brown v. EBI Companies, 289 Or 905 , 618 P3d 959 (1980); Korter v. EBI Companies, Inc., 46 Or App 43 , 610 P2d 312 (1980), 51 Or App 206 , 625 P2d 667 (1981).

Hessell v. Board of Parole

338 Or. App. 265 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 26, 2025

In Contreras v. … Similarly, in Washington v.

Hessell v. Board of Parole

338 Or. App. 265 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 26, 2025

In Contreras v. … Similarly, in Washington v.

Perez v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

145 Or. App. 252 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 11, 1996

Petitioner’s arguments are resolved contrary to his position by our decisions in Schuch v. Board of Parole, 139 Or App 327 , 912 P2d 403 , rev den 324 Or 78 (1996), and Gress v. … Board of Parole, 143 Or App 7 , 924 P2d 329 , on recons 144 Or App 375 , 927 P2d 138 (1996). Affirmed.

Catlin v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

127 Or. App. 409 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 20, 1994

Finally, petitioner contends that the Board violated the requirement of ORS 144.135 that the Board give “detailed bases” of its decisions, including those made under ORS 144.122. He suggests that Anderson v. … ORS 144.035 provides, in part: “(1) In hearings conducted by the State Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, the board may sit together or in panels. “(2) Panels may consist of one or two board members * *

Roof v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

159 Or. App. 408 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 31, 1999

As we held in Denham v. … See also Rickman v. Board of Parole, 153 Or App 709, 712 , 959 P2d 617 (1998).

State ex rel. Travis v. Board of Parole

154 Or. App. 718 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 24, 1998

I agree with the majority that this is a proper case for mandamus, but, for the reasons that I discussed in my dissent in Weidner v. … See, e.g., State ex rel Upham v. McElligott, 326 Or 547, 553 , 956 P2d 179 (1998) (dismissing alternative writ that challenged the defendant judge’s denial of jury trial as of right to juvenile).