Opinion

Hall v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

  • 138 Or. App. 177
  • 906 P.2d 309
  • 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 1648
Court
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Filed
Nov 29, 1995
Status
Published
On the bench
Deits, Hasel, Muniz, Ton
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 17.1%

The opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks judicial review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (Board), arguing that the Board erred in imposing a parole supervision term of 163 months based on ORS 144.085(l)(c). Petitioner argues that the statute is not applicable because his crimes were committed in May 1987, and the statute applies only to crimes committed after September 29, 1991. We agree. Fernandez v. Board of Parole, 137 Or App 247 , 904 P2d 1071 (1995).

Petitioner also argues that the Board’s retroactive application of the sexual offender notification statute to him was a violation of the state and federal ex post facto clauses. We disagree. Williford v. Board of Parole, 137 Or App 254 , 904 P2d 1074 (1995). Petitioner’s remaining assignments of error do not require discussion.

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.