Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.14s
Pope v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
241 Or. App. 656 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 23, 2011
Janowski / Fleming v. Board of Parole, 349 Or 432 , 245 P3d 1270 (2010).
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoise Cascade Corp. v. State Ex Rel. Board of Forestry
216 Or. App. 338 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 5, 2007
Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of Forestry, 186 Or App 291 , 63 P3d 598 , rev den, 335 Or 578 , cert den, 540 US 1075 (2003) (Boise V). … Pacific University, 324 Or 231, 235 , 924 P2d 818 (1996) (quoting Brown v. J. C. Penney Co., 297 Or 695, 705 , 688 P2d 811 (1984)) (brackets in Conway).
Cited 4 timesPublished27 Or. App. 929 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 27, 1976
v. … Neely v. Brown, 161 So2d 414 (La App 1964), and Smith v. Brown, 147 So2d 452 (La App 1962), are both cases in which off-duty conduct was held not to be work-connected.
Cited 19 timesPublishedMartinez v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION
242 Or. App. 176 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 13, 2011
App. 176 Ernest Raymond MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent. A133672. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Submitted on Remand March 21, 2011. Decided April 13, 2011. Walter J. … Janowski/Fleming v. Board of Parole, 349 Or. 432 , 245 P.3d 1270 (2010).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMcMullen v. District School Board of School District 24J
21 Or. App. 56 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 7, 1975
See, Funston v. District School Board, etc., 130 Or 82 , 278 P 1075 (1929). … To the same effect see, Lommasson v. School Dist.
Cited 1 timesPublishedVukasin v. Liberty Northwest Insurance
271 Or. App. 142 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 13, 2015
was required to analyze the compensability of the 2009 surgery under a different standard in the light of our recent decisions in Brown v. … a different legal standard for determining compensability than the standard articulated in the Brown line of cases.
Cited 1 timesPublished302 Or. App. 124 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 29, 2020
Amanda COOPER, Petitioner, v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY and Brown Group Retail, Respondents. … Hammond v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp., 296 Or App 241, 437 P3d 269 (2019).
Cited 1 timesPublished337 Or. App. 166 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 26, 2024
The board’s order explained its decision and provided a rational connection between the facts and the legal con- clusions it drew from them. See United Academics of OSU v. … He acknowledges that this court rejected that argument in Green v. Board of Parole, 308 Or App 159, 160, 478 P3d 608 (2020), rev den, 368 Or 138 (2021), and provides no basis for this court to overrule Green.
Cited 1 timesUnpublished262 Or. App. 629 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 7, 2014
Counts v. International Paper Co., 146 Or App 768 , 934 P2d 526 (1997); Faught v. SAIF, 70 Or App 388 , 689 P2d 1038 (1984); Brooks v. D & R Timber, 55 Or App 688 , 639 P2d 700 (1982). … As we recently explained in Brown v. SAIF, 262 Or App 640 , 325 P3d 834 (2014), however, the terms “compensable injury” and “accepted condition” are not interchangeable.
Cited 11 timesPublishedOregon Ass'n of Acupuncture & Oriental Medicine v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners
260 Or. App. 676 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 23, 2014
See State v. … State v. Perry, 336 Or 49, 53 , 77 P3d 313 (2003); see also Hopkins v.
Cited 13 timesPublished337 Or. App. 166 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 26, 2024
The board’s order explained its decision and provided a rational connection between the facts and the legal con- clusions it drew from them. See United Academics of OSU v. … He acknowledges that this court rejected that argument in Green v. Board of Parole, 308 Or App 159, 160, 478 P3d 608 (2020), rev den, 368 Or 138 (2021), and provides no basis for this court to overrule Green.
Cited 2 timesUnpublishedPope v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION
241 Or. App. 656 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 23, 2011
App. 656 Charles Samuel POPE, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent. A142511. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Submitted December 20, 2010. Decided March 23, 2011. … Janowski/Fleming v. Board of Parole, 349 Or. 432 , 245 P.3d 1270 (2010).
Cited 1 timesPublishedByrns v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION
241 Or. App. 657 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 23, 2011
App. 657 Gerald Lee BYRNS, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent. A142800. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Submitted December 20, 2010. Decided March 23, 2011. … Janowski/Fleming v. Board of Parole, 349 Or. 432 , 245 P.3d 1270 (2010).
Cited 0 timesPublishedKnutson Towboat Co. v. Oregon Board of Maritime Pilots
131 Or. App. 364 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 23, 1994
We note, initially, that it is petitioner’s burden to prove that Board members were biased. Teledyne Wah Chang v. Energy Fac. Siting Council, 298 Or 240, 262 , 692 P2d 86 (1984). … Portland Steamship Operators v. Coos Bay Pilots, 39 Or App 513, 516 , 592 P2d 1060 (1979).
Cited 1 timesPublished80 Or. App. 448 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 23, 1986
However, as we have already noted, there are several references to low back pain in the reports, although, as Brown stated, they may not be indicative of a disc herniation. … See Grable v. Weyerhaeuser Company, 291 Or 387 , 631 P2d 768 (1981). We affirm the Board’s denial of interim compensation, attorney fees and penalties.
Cited 6 timesPublished346 Or. App. 70 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 24, 2025
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON JOSEPH CHARLES LONG, Petitioner, v. … Petitioner seeks judicial review of a final order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (board). Petitioner’s appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to ORAP 5.90 and State v.
Cited 1 timesUnpublished261 Or. App. 133 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 20, 2014
See ORAP 5.40(8)(c); Brown v. Roach, 249 Or App 579, 580 , 277 P3d 628 (2012). … Brown, 249 Or App at 586 .
Cited 26 timesPublished285 Or. App. 402 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 10, 2017
See ORS 656.005(7)(a)(B); ORS 656.262(6)(c); Brown v. SAIF, 361 Or 241, 243 , 391 P3d 773 (2017) (explaining the nature of a “combined condition” claim for workers’ compensation benefits). … decision in Brown v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLiberty Northwest Insurance v. Hughes
197 Or. App. 553 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 16, 2005
Our only other decision interpreting ORS 656.390 is Winters v. … Brown v. Argonaut Insurance Company, 93 Or App 588, 591 , 763 P2d 408 (1988). At issue in Brown was a denial based on the lack of supporting medical evidence.
Cited 3 timesPublished345 Or. App. 610 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 10, 2025
Reviewing for “legal error and substantial evi- dence[ ] (including substantial reason),” Morrison v. … No amended reply brief was filed by petitioner and this case was scheduled for submission. 612 Downs v.
Cited 1 timesUnpublished
Ask Donna