The opinion
70 December 24, 2025 No. 1114
This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion
pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited
except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE
STATE OF OREGON
JOSEPH CHARLES LONG,
Petitioner,
v.
BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON
SUPERVISION,
Respondent.
A184852
Submitted November 14, 2025.
Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate
Section, Oregon Public Defense Commission, filed the brief
for petitioner.
Philip Thoennes, Assistant Attorney General, waived
appearance for respondent.
Before Lagesen, Chief Judge, and Egan, Judge.
EGAN, J.
Affirmed.
Nonprecedential Memo Op: 346 Or App 70 (2025) 71
EGAN, J.
Petitioner seeks judicial review of a final order of
the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (board).
Petitioner’s appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to
ORAP 5.90 and State v. Balfour, 311 Or 434, 814 P2d 1069
(1991). The brief does not contain a Section B. See ORAP
5.90(1)(b). We affirm.1
The board revoked petitioner’s supervision and
imposed a 90-day sanction based on its determinations that
petitioner had violated conditions of his supervision requir-
ing him to report to his supervisory officer as directed, obey
all laws, and have no contact with specified individuals.
Having reviewed the record and the Balfour brief, we have
identified no arguably meritorious issues.
Affirmed.
1
As authorized by ORS 2.570(2)(b), this matter is determined by a two-judge
panel.