Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersor

8,515 results

3.92s

  • Schiffer v. United Grocers, Inc.

    329 Or. 86 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1999

    Indiana: Gates v. … Browning, 4 SW2d 734, 735 (Ky 1928) (“valid release of one joint obligor in a writing without the consent of the other or others will likewise release them”); but see Ky Rev Stat Ann § 411.182(4) (Baldwin 1998) (“release,

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Greenberg v. LEE

    196 Or. 157 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 24, 1952

    . *160 The plaintiff-respondent is a distributor of punch-boards in the city of Portland. This litigation is instituted for the benefit of himself and all other persons engaged in the same business. … State v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • M & M Wood Working Co. v. State Industrial Accident Commission

    201 Or. 603 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1954

    Mason v. Woods, 172 F2d 857, 860; Landon Terrace v. Creedon, 162 F2d 722, 728; Sirianni v. Bowles, 148 F2d 343, 344. … Portland, 79 Or 260 , 154 P 410 ; State v. Savage, 96 Or 53 , 184 P 567 ; Van Winkle v. Fred Meyer, Inc., 151 Or 455 , 49 P2d 1140 ; Bell v. State Industrial Accident Commission, 157 Or 653 , 74 P2d 55 ; Savage v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Batten v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.

    368 Or. 538 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 17, 2021

    Co. v. … See Mastriano v. Board of Parole, 342 Or 684, 693, 159 P3d 1151 (2007) (“[W]e generally presume that the leg- islature enacts statutes in light of existing judicial decisions that have a bearing on those statutes.”).

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • In re Complaint as to the Conduct of Jaffee

    331 Or. 400 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 14, 2000

    The proceedings are before this court on briefs submitted by the Oregon State Bar and on the record made before two trial panels of the Disciplinary Board. … 1998 amended formal complaint alleged: “On or about September 13, 1991, judgment was entered in favor of the United States of America against the Accused in the amount of $13,625, in the matter of United States of America v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Tourtillott

    289 Or. 835 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1980

    Delaware v. … But this obviously is a very different thing from the preventive checkpoints administered at boarding points in order to exclude dangerous persons or items from the airplane.

    Cited 79 timesPublished
  • Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Co. v. Dept. of Rev.

    372 Or. 509 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 20, 2024

    That year, the Court decided Northwestern Cement Co. v. Minn., 358 US 450, 79 S Ct 357, 3 L Ed 2d 421 (1959), fol- lowed shortly afterward by the Court dismissing an appeal in Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. … See Sullivan v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Crimson Trace Corp. v. Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

    355 Or. 476 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 30, 2014

    See Hatley v. … Hardy v.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • State v. A. R. H.

    371 Or. 82 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 25, 2023

    B. v. … State v.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • State v. Mott

    370 Or. 830 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 6, 2023

    State v. … State v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Stevens v. Myers

    62 Or. 372 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1912

    She secured board near his residence, took his treatment for several months, and then returned to Portland, Oregon. … Farr v. O’Neall, 1 Rich. (S, C.) 80, 89. See, also, Shaio v. Camp, 163 Ill. 144 ( 45 N. E. 211 : 36 L. R. A. 112) ; Jones v. Shewmake, 35 Ga. 151 ; Murray v. Oliver, 41 N. C. 55 ; Haven v. Foster, 14 Pick.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • State v. Archerd

    144 Or. 309 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 12, 1933

    In Baberick v. … The purpose of the notice to the engineer is to advise him that an appeal has been taken so that he can transmit or produce before said board the papers, maps, etc.” *329 In Jarvis v. Chase County, 64 Neb. 74 ( 89 N.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Valenti v. Hopkins

    324 Or. 324 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1996

    Francis, Bend, filed a brief on behalf of amicus curiae Central Oregon Board of Realtors. Before CARSON, C.J., and GILLETTE, VAN HOOMISSEN, FADELEY, GRABER, and DURHAM, JJ. [*] VAN HOOMISSEN, Justice. … The court relied primarily on Lincoln Const. v. Thomas J.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Dunn v. First Nat. Bank of Portland

    149 Or. 97 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 6, 1934

    A. 1918F, 137); Watkins v. Piggly Wiggly Bird Co., 31 Fed. (2d) 889; Viles v. Thunborg, 164 Wash. 190 ( 2 P. (2d) 666 ); and 45 C. J. 866. The case of Hoyt v. Woodbury, supra, is referred to and followed in Hertz v. … As was said in Clark v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State ex rel Kotek v. Fagan

    367 Or. 803 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 9, 2021

    See Reynolds v. … See Hartung v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Friends of the Columbia Gorge v. Energy Facility Siting Council

    365 Or. 371 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 1, 2019

    In Don't Waste Oregon Com. v. … Brown v. Portland School Dist. #1 , 291 Or. 77 , 81, 628 P.2d 1183 (1981) (internal citation omitted).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Kontz v. B. P. John Furniture Corp.

    167 Or. 187 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 22, 1941

    Restatement of the Law, Contracts, § 511, and Eley v. Miller (Ore.), 110 P. (2d) 587 . … Eley v. Miller, supra, and Wolfgang v. Henry Thiele Catering Co., 128 Or. 433 , 275 P. 33 .

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • State v. Guzman/Heckler

    366 Or. 18 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 27, 2019

    State v. Mersman and State v. … Brown, 295 Kan 181, 196-97, 284 P3d 977, 990 (2012)).

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Citizens for Resp. Devel. in The Dalles v. Walmart

    366 Or. 272 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 16, 2020

    See Coos Waterkeeper v. … Devel. in The Dalles v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. State

    331 Or. 634 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 8, 2001

    See State v. … PSRB, 315 Or 402, 405 , 848 P2d 1194 (1993) (justiciability requires “that the court’s decision in the matter will have some practical effect on the rights of the parties to the controversy”); Brown v.

    Cited 422 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.