Case law

Knopp v. Griffin-Valade

372 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 1, 2024

Couey v. … Chapman v.

State v. Jackson

364 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 6, 2018

See, e.g. , State v. … Brown v. Mississippi , 297 U.S. 278 , 56 S.Ct. 461 , 80 L.Ed. 682 (1936).

State v. Soto

372 Or. 561 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 11, 2024

In State v. … Hazell v. Brown, 352 Or 455, 465, 287 P3d 1079 (2012) (citing State v. Guzek, 322 Or 245, 265, 906 P2d 272 (1995)).

Martinson v. State Industrial Accident Commission

154 Or. 423 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1936

as follows: Respondent, Grant Smith-Porter Ship Company, at and prior to the time of libelant’s injury was engaged in constructing steam vessels for the United States government under contract with United States Shipping Board … Dept. of Labor, supra; Grant Smith-Porter Ship Co. v. Rohde, supra; Dewey Fish Co. v. Dept. of Labor, supra. In Woodworth v. Ind. Acc.

Hansen v. Oregon-Wash. R. & N. Co.

97 Or. 190 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 27, 1920

L. 151; Schumann v. Wager, 36 Or. 65, 68 , ( 58 Pac. 770 ); Askay v. Maloney, 92 Or. 566, 574 ( 179 Pac. 899 ); Egbers v. Egbers, 177 Ill. 82 ( 52 N. E. 285 ); Valente v. Sierra R. … It is true that two of the plaintiffs took samples from cases in March, and that David Hansen and one of his daughters saw the pile of cases occasionally when going to the dock to board a boat; but those circumstances did

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Kumley

335 Or. 639 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 14, 2003

A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board determined that the accused had committed all three charged violations and suspended him from the practice of law for 12 months. … We find by clear and convincing evidence that the accused violated ORS 9.160. *651 V. SANCTION We now must determine the appropriate sanction.

Smiley v. ACKERMAN

196 Or. 383 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1952

This listing was in writing upon a form approved by the Portland Realty Board. We now digress a moment for the purpose of disclosing the part which the defendants Clanssen played in the transaction. … In 17 CJS, Contracts, 921, § 439, it is stated: *394 See also Milton v. Hare et al., 130 Or 590 , 280 P 511 ; Rayburn et al. v.

Olson v. Chuck

199 Or. 90 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 8, 1953

The parties seemingly are in agreement that Noonan v. … Caviness v. City of Vale, supra, and other decisions by this court to the same effect, of which Noonan v.

Hartung v. Bradbury

332 Or. 570 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 18, 2001

See, e.g., Brown v. Thompson, 462 US 835, 842 , 103 S Ct 2690 , 77 L Ed 2d 214 (1983) (discussing requirements). … In Hovet v.

East Valley Water v. Water Resources Commission

374 Or. 148 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 7, 2025

Marshall v. … Rosenblum v.

Condit v. Bodding

147 Or. 299 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1934

In the suit of Neppach v. … See, also, in this connection, Blair v. McCool, 136 Or. 139 ( 295 P. 950 , 298 P. 244 ), and Brown v. Siemens, 117 Or. 583 ( 245 P. 510 ).

Standard Lbr. Co. v. Pierce

112 Or. 314 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 16, 1924

State of Oregon and maintains no general business headquarters therein, except that the office of its secretary is located in said state, and at the office of the secretary from time to time are held formal meetings of its board … Co. v. Powers, 201 U. S. 245 ( 50 L. Ed. 744 , 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 459); Bell’s Gap R. Co. v. Pennsylvania, 134 U. S. 232 ( 33 L. Ed. 892 , 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 533); Home Ins. Co. v. New York, 134 U. S. 594 ( 33 L.

Caspar v. Parker

175 Or. 555 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 16, 1945

Although there is some language in Phipps v. Willis , 53 Or. 190 , 96 P. 866 , 99 P. 935 , 18 Ann. … In re Brown's Estate , 165 Or. 575 , 108 P.2d 775 ; Ramstead v. Bridges, ante p. 182, 152 P.2d 306 ; Williamson v. North Pac. Lumber Co. , 42 Or. 153 , 70 P. 387 , 532 ; 37 C.J.S., Fraud, § 95, p. 401.

State v. Cartwright

246 Or. 120 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 28, 1966

Silverman v. United States, 365 US 505 ; Ker v. California, *128 374 US 23 .” Mr. … CARTWRIGHT, *141 JR. be continued on probation to tbe Oregon State Board of Parole and Probation until tbe 15th day of August, 1960.”

In re Bertoni

363 Or. 614 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 13, 2018

A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board found that respondent had committed most but not all the charged violations. … See Lancaster v.

In Re Porter

320 Or. 692 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 30, 1995

A trial panel of the disciplinary board found the accused guilty on both counts and suspended him from the practice of law for 30 days. The accused requested direct review by this court. … For example, in Ainsworth v.

U.S. Bancorp v. Department of Revenue

337 Or. 625 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 16, 2004

See Delehant v. Board on Police Standards, 317 Or 273, 278 , 855 P2d 1088 (1993) (so stating). Rather, in deciding whether to apply a rule retroactively, we must discern the intent of the promulgating agency. Id.; cf. … See Booras v.

Comcast of Oregon II, Inc. v. City of Eugene

346 Or. 238 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 11, 2009

Hale v. … In Smith v.

Herald Publishing Co. v. Klamath Falls Publishing Co.

116 Or. 62 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 22, 1925

Sweeney v. Jackson County, 93 Or. 96 ( 178 Pac. 365 , 182 Pac. 380 ). … Coughlin v. Gleason, 121 N. Y. 631 ( 25 N.

State Ex Rel. Academy Press, Ltd. v. Beckett

282 Or. 701 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1978

Brown, of Young, Horn, Cass & Scott, Eugene, argued the cause for defendant. TONGUE, Justice. … Western Seed v.