Case law

Lake County Board of Equalization v. Department of Revenue

257 Or. 244 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1970

was filed in the Tax Court to reverse and modify an order by the Department of Revenue under which the assessed value of the ZX Ranch for the tax year 1968-69 was reduced from $3,405,730, as established by the Lake County Board

Northern Pacific Ry. Co. v. John Day Irrigation District

106 Or. 140 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 2, 1923

S.) 825); Leavengood v. McGee, 50 Or. 233 ( 91 Pac. 453 ); Umatilla Water Users’ Assn. v. Irvin, 56 Or. 414 ( 108 Pac. 1016 ); Brown v. Webb, 60 Or. 526 ( 120 Pac. 387 , Ann. Cas. 1914A, 148); Splonskofsky v. … Evans, 82 Or. 54 ( 160 Pac. 140 ); State ex rel. v. Deschutes County et al., 88 Or. 661 ( 173 Pac. 158 ). In Brown v. Webb, supra, Mr.

Payette-Oregon Slope Irrigation District v. Coughanour

162 Or. 458 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 6, 1939

Y. 324 ; Hassan v. City of Rochester, 67 N. Y. 528 ; Helm v. Witz, 35 Ind. App. 131 , 73 N. E. 846 ; Diggins v. Brown, 76 Cal. 318 , 18 P. 373 ; Ryan v. … Board of Supervisors, St. Croix County, 46 Wis. 210 , 50 N. W. 1013 . We are not dealing with a case, as in Cannon v.

School District No. 1 v. State Board of Education

250 Or. 133 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 17, 1968

Midland County, Texas, 390 US 474 , 88 S Ct 1114 , 20 L ed2d 45 (1968); Dusch et al v. Davis et al, 387 US 112 , 87 S Ct 1554 , 18 L ed2d 656 (1967); Reynolds v. … Sims, 377 US 533 , 84 S Ct 1362 , 12 L ed2d 506 (1964); and Gray v. Sanders, 372 US 368 , 83 S Ct 801 , 9 L ed2d 821 (1963). We doubt the relevance of such a contention.

State v. Duniway

63 Or. 555 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1912

There is no reason why the State cannot proceed under that section as well as an individual or a private corporation. 36 Cyc. 907; Brown v. State, 5 Colo. 496, 498 ; Delafield v. State of Illinois, 2 Hill (N. … Dillon, Municipal Corporations, Section 43; Brown v. State, 5 Colo. 496, 498 . It is said by Mr. Justice Bean, in the case of State ex rel. v. Metschan, 32 Or. 372, 384 ( 46 Pac. 793 : 53 Pac. 107 : 41 L. R.

Evans v. Hurlburt

117 Or. 274 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1926

The authority of the board so to act is challenged, but not the manner in which it was exercised. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

Trautmann v. Supreme Lodge

107 Or. 593 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 3, 1923

This gave the board the power in this instance to cancel Trautmann’s certificate, as it could not be reduced to a minimum amount, being already the minimum, and the board’s action in so canceling was strictly within its power … Bean, Brown and McCourt, JJ., concur.

Matter of Compensation of Bracke

294 Or. 483 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1983

See, Cunningham v. Compensation Dept., 1 Or App 127 , 459 P2d 892 (1969), and Boorman v. … v.

State v. D. J. M.

366 Or. 292 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 9, 2020

Brown (A162584)(S067385)(300 Or App 530) State v. Postlethwait, William Anthony (A167015)(S067153)(300 Or App 217) Appellant’s petition for review is allowed. … Kelly (A167499)(S067405)(300 Or App 823) King v. Oregon Department of State Police (A168712)(S067319)(300 Or App 823) M & S Electric, LLC v. Electrical and Elevator Board (A167597)(S067315)(300 Or App 823).

Cook v. Employment Division

293 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1982

In Cook v. Employment Division, 51 Or App 307 , 625 P2d 668 (1981), the Court of Appeals denied the petition for attorney fees, noting that in a related case, Brown v. … We reverse and remand this case to the Court of Appeals for a ruling on the matter of attorney fees on a basis which is consistent with ORS 183.495. 1 See Brown v.

Radley v. Columbia Railway Co.

44 Or. 332 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 8, 1904

Scarboro, 97 Ala. 316 ( 12 South. 289 ); Willmot v. Corrigan Consol. St. Ry. Co. 106 Mo. 535 ( 17 S. W. 490 ); Lake Shore & M. S. Ry. Co. v. Brown, 123 Ill. 162 ( 14 N. E. 197 , 5 Am. St. Rep. 510 ); Indianapolis & St. … Indianapolis v. Horst, 93 U. S. 291 , and Lake Shore & M. S. Ry. Co. v. Brown, 123 Ill. 162 ( 5 Am. St. Rep. 510 , 14 N. E. 195 ), are not in any way parallel cases.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Banks

283 Or. 459 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 12, 1978

Cannon v. US. … Hutton & Company v.

State Ex Rel. School District No. 56 v. Kleckner

116 Or. 371 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 22, 1925

BROWN J., concurs. *Page 375 Reversed and dismissed on rehearing December 2, 1925. ON PETITION FOR REHEARING. ( 240 P. 1115 .) … McBRIDE, C.J., and BEAN and BROWN, JJ., concur. *Page 376

Friends of Yamhill County, Inc. v. Board of Com'rs of Yamhill County

349 Or. 602 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 3, 2011

249 P.3d 123 (2011) 349 Or. 602 FRIENDS OF YAMHILL COUNTY, INC. v. BOARD OF COM'RS OF YAMHILL COUNTY. (S058915). Supreme Court of Oregon. February 3, 2011. Petition for review allowed.

Nesbit v. Bd. of Licensed Prof'l Counselors & Therapists

363 Or. 677 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 13, 2018

Smith v. Patterson

130 Or. 73 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 11, 1929

Carson v. … Brown, J., absent.

Green v. Hayward

275 Or. 693 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 5, 1976

In Roseta *707 v. … Citizens Ass’n. of Georgetown, Inc. v.

Loe v. Britting

132 Or. 572 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 8, 1930

Justice Wolverton in Harris v. … The effect of the decision in Ladd v.

Coast Range Conifers, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Oregon State Board of Forestry

339 Or. 136 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 11, 2005

Coast Range Conifers v. Board of Forestry, 189 Or App 531, 550 , 76 P3d 1148 (2003), adh’d to on recons, 192 Or App 126 , 83 P3d 966 (2004). … Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of Forestry, 325 Or 185, 198 , 935 P2d 411 (1997); see Dodd v.

T.D.F. v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

363 Or. 104 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 24, 2018