rejecting respondent’s argument that petitioner’s arguments were not preserved because, “[i]n light of then-controlling authority, which treated peti- tioner’s * * * motion as a mechanism to preserve his claims, he did everything that could be reasonably expected to pres- ent the motion and related claims to the court”
How later courts described this case
- rejecting respondent’s argument that petitioner’s arguments were not preserved because, “[i]n light of then-controlling authority, which treated peti- tioner’s * * * motion as a mechanism to preserve his claims, he did everything that could be reasonably expected to pres- ent the motion and related claims to the court”
- exercising discretion to correct the trial court’s plain error in imposing statutory fines on felony counts under ORS 137.286 based on the mis- taken belief that the fines were “mandatory”
- declining to address contention that trial court plainly erred in imposing sentence, where the trial court would have an opportu- nity to address that issue in the first instance on remand
- distinguishing, in a wrongful death action against mental-health providers following decedent’s suicide, cer- tain custodial circumstances in which a care provider has assumed an affirmative duty of self-care for a patient or inmate
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
292
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
(460 P3d 1011-1017, 461 P3d 221-222)
ALLOWED
April 9, 2020
De Young v. Brown (A162584)(S067385)(300 Or App 530)
State v. Postlethwait, William Anthony (A167015)(S067153)(300 Or App 217)
Appellant’s petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of
Appeals is vacated, and this case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for
reconsideration in light of Martinez v. Cain, 366 Or 136, 458 P3d 670 (2020).
State v. Ramoz, Talon Duane (A163802)(S067290)(299 Or App 787)
DENIED
April 9, 2020
Bank of New York Mellon v. Delaney (A163489)(S067146)(299 Or App 1)
Bates, Personal Representative of the Estate of Olivia Sophia Bates, Deceased v.
Andaluz Waterbirth Center (A163860)(S067158)(298 Or App 733). Nakamoto
and Duncan, JJ., would allow.
Bell, Larry Lydell, Sr. v. Hendricks (A167781)(S067468)(301 Or App 216)
Department of Human Services v. B. H. (A171480/81)(A171483)(A171486-88)
(S067455)(301 Or App 699)
Department of Human Services v. S. L. (A171815)(S067495)(302 Or App 186)
Gardner, Personal Representative of the Estate of Jacqueline S. Mahoney v.
Oregon Health and Sciences University (A165903)(S067252)(299 Or App 280)
Goins, Gary L. v. Cain (A167023)(S067367)(300 Or App 582)
Graham v. SAIF Corporation (A167774)(S067251)(299 Or App 831)
Herrera-Roman, Alberto v. Cain (A169267)(S067434)(301 Or App 699)
Herzog, Gary K. v. Kelly (A166364)(S067296)(299 Or App 831)
Jensen, Joel v. Kelly (A167499)(S067405)(300 Or App 823)
King v. Oregon Department of State Police (A168712)(S067319)(300 Or App 823)
M & S Electric, LLC v. Electrical and Elevator Board (A167597)(S067315)(300 Or
App 823). Balmer and Nelson, JJ., would allow.
Pelham, Charles Edward v. Kelly (A166751)(S067402)(300 Or App 822)
State v. Bernabei, Jennifer Lynn (A168132)(S067462)(301 Or App 636)
State v. Chester, Shane Maurice (A166631)(S067540)(301 Or App 636)
State v. Cornelius, Thomas Melvin (A168431)(S067522)(301 Or App 637)
State v. Craigen, George West (A161522)(S067373)(300 Or App 451)
State v. D. J. M. (A164523)(S067361)(300 Or App 822)
State v. Downing, Donovan Keith Pulver (A168633)(S067530)(302 Or App 187)
State v. Enyart, Christopher Allen (A167111)(S067359)(300 Or App 217)
State v. Fifita, Rudy (A167966)(S067537)(302 Or App 187)
State v. Garcia-Beiza, Arodi (A167299)(A167298)(S067504)(301 Or App 636) State
v. Gaul, Jennifer Elizabeth (A166234)(S067412)(301 Or App 142)
State v. Hatfield, Elzie Wright (A166995)(A167058-60)(S067340)(300 Or App 403)
State v. Hernandez, Cesar Zavala (A162396)(S067280)(299 Or App 544)
State v. Hernandez-Valle, Victor Manuel (A167829)(S067334)(301 Or App 318)
State v. J. G. (A169907)(S067518)(301 Or App 636)
State v. M. H. H. (A169810)(S067438)(301 Or App 699)
State v. Manning, Samuel Justin (A164972)(S067356)(300 Or App 390)
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW — Continued 293
(460 P3d 1017, 1019-1020; 461 P3d 222)
State v. Moore, Randy Allen (A166912)(S067362)(300 Or App 579)
State v. Morales, Eugene Manuel (A164511)(S067399)(299 Or App 392). Nakamoto
and Duncan, JJ., would allow.
State v. Murdock, Sierra Nicole (A167630)(S067487)(301 Or App 853)
State v. Sheikh-Nur, Yusuf Dahir (A167017-19)(A167513)(S067308)(300 Or App
403)
Wetherell v. Douglas County (A171917)(S067215)(300 Or App 404)