Case law

Goodale v. Wheeler

41 Or. 190 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 28, 1902

This was the last meeting attempted to be held by the board of directors, and none were held between November 25, 1892, and that time. … The principles here involved and stated find support in Currie v. Bowman, 25 Or. 364 ( 35 Pac. 848 , 44 Am. & Eng. Corp. Cas. 662); Jolly v. Kyle, 27 Or. 95 ( 39 Pac. 999 ); Bennett v.

Parker v. Harris Pine Mills, Inc.

206 Or. 187 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1955

Muldowney v. Middleman, 107 A. (2d) 173, 175; Builders Supply Co. v. McCabe, 77 A. (2d) 368. … In Allen et ux. v.

Schleiger v. Northern Terminal Co.

43 Or. 4 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 1, 1903

See, also, Brown v. Chicago & N. W. R. Co. 102 Wis. 137 ( 77 N. W. 748 , 78 N. W. 771 , 44 L. R. A. 579); Hulbert v. City of Topeka (C. C.), 34 Fed. 510 ; Davis v. St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. 53 Ark. 117 (7 L. R. … Co. v. Bohn, 27 Mich. 503 ; Cooper v. Lake Shore & M. S. Ry. Co. 66 Mich. 261 ( 33 N. W. 306 , 11 Am. St. Rep. 482 ); Wright v. Detroit, G. H. & M. Ry. Co. 77 Mich. 123 ( 43 N. W. 765 ); Lehman v. Eureka Iron & S.

Roles v. Roles Shingle Company

147 Or. 365 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1934

And it is the action of the board of directors in authorizing the payment of this sum and the actual payment thereof which the plaintiff makes the principal basis of his demand for an accounting. … corporation is owned by a few, and all or most of the stockholders are actively engaged in the enterprise of the corporation, it is often the practice to transact ordinary business- without formal resolutions: First National Bank v.

Gulick v. Nelson

176 Or. 610 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 9, 1945

Sutherland v. Wickey , 133 Or. 266 , 271 , 289 P. 375 ; Coston v. Portland Trust Co., et al , 131 Or. 71 , 77 , 282 P. 442 ; Coast Engine Machine Works v. Barbee , 130 Or. 159 , 279 P. 264 ; Davis v. … Bertrum , 55 Or. 349 , 104 P. 963 , 106 P. 444 ; McCoy v. Crossfield , 54 Or. 591 , 104 P. 423 ; Board of Regents v. Hutchinson , 46 Or. 57 , 78 P. 1028 ; Goldsmith v. Elwert , 31 Or. 539 , 50 P. 867 ; Cooper v.

Rogers v. Meridian Park Hospital

307 Or. 612 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1989

In Ellis v. … The physicians’ duty of care is codified in ORS 677.095, which provides: “A physician or podiatrist licensed to practice medicine or podiatry by the Board of Medical Examiners for the State of Oregon has the duty to use that

State v. Nix

Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 7, 2014

.”); State v. … In State v.

Portland v. Kozer

108 Or. 375 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 24, 1923

Citing, Northwest Auto Co. v. … Board of Equalization, 47 Or. 585 ( 86 Pac. 365 ). In Northwest Auto Co. v. Hurlburt, 104 Or. 398 ( 207 Pac. 161 ), this court, speaking by Mr.

Ludwig v. Zidell

167 Or. 488 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 6, 1941

It need not be the sole cause, but it must be a concurring cause such as might reasonably have been contemplated as involving the result under the attending circumstances. ’ ’ Brown v. O. W. R. & N. … Kukacka v.

Johnson v. Johnson

302 Or. 382 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1986

Co. v. Pac. Gen. Con., Inc., 226 Or 145, 151 , 359 P2d 530 (1961); Friese v. Hummel, supra. … Larson v. Heintz Construction Company, [ 219 Or 25 (1959)], Lothstein v. Fitzpatrick, 171 Or. 648, 658 (1943), O.-W.R. & N. Co. v. Reid, 155 Or 602, 610 (1937); Dixon v. Simpson, 130 Or. 211, 221-222 , Windsor v.

In Re Estate of Meier

190 Or. 140 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 28, 1950

They cite in this connection Luper v. Werts and Smith, 19 Or. 122 , 23 P. 850 . … Greenwood v.

State Ex Rel. Ware v. Hieber

267 Or. 124 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 1, 1973

We decided in State ex rel White Lbr. v. … Adjustment Company v.

Mannix v. Portland Telegram

144 Or. 172 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 4, 1933

Odgers on Libel and Slander, p. 320, (citing Finnerty v. Tipper, 2 Camp. 72; May v. Brown, 3 B. & C. 113). … In Davis v.

Conroy v. Rosenblum

358 Or. 807 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 24, 2016

As we said in Towers v. … Whitsett v. Kroger, 348 Or 243, 247 , 230 P3d 545 (2010).” *811 And, as we said in Kain/Waller v.

State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. M. T.

321 Or. 419 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 10, 1995

Dept. v. M. T., 128 Or App 25, 31 , 874 P2d 836 (1994). … Smith v. Multnomah County Board of Commissioners, 318 Or 302, 309 , 865 P2d 356 (1994); Colby v. Larson, 208 Or 121, 126-27 , 297 P2d 1073 (1956).

State v. Wright

323 Or. 8 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1996

And is it correct that basically your license has been revoked by the board of— “A No, it is not correct. … In State v.

State v. Gralewski's Estate

176 Or. 448 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1945

This proceeding was commenced by the state of Oregon through the State Land Board, claiming that the moneys on deposit in the two banks in the name of Kurt Gralewski were in fact the property of John Gralewski and that they … In Holbrook v.

Thompson v. Larsen

118 Or. 421 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 19, 1926

.” *434 In Garnier v. … Brown, J., concurs in this dissenting opinion.

Carson v. Hayes

39 Or. 97 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 29, 1901

Iron Co. v. Tucker, 48 Ohio St. 41 ( 29 Am. St. Rep. 528 , 26 N. E. 630 ) ; Lincoln v. Rodgers, 1 Mont. 217 ; Hill v. Smith, 4 Morrison, Min. Rep. 597; Logan v. Driscoll, 6 Morrison, Min. Rep. 172 ; Esmond v. … A. 568); Wimer v. Simmons, 27 Or. 1 ( 39 Pac. 6 , 50 Am. St. Rep. 685 ); Grigsby v. Clear Lake Water Co. 40 Cal. 396 ; Anaheim Water Co. v. Semi-Tropic Water Co. 64 Cal. 185 ( 30 Pac. 623 ); Alta Land & Water Co. v.

Frankland v. City of Lake Oswego

267 Or. 452 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1973

In Thompson v. … In Karoblis v.