Case law

Klinicki v. Lundgren

298 Or. 662 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1985

Petters v. St. Cloud Enterprises, Inc., supra, applied the rule of Miller v. Miller, supra. See also Ellzey v. … However, in Rexnord, Inc. v.

City of Portland v. Besser

10 Or. 242 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1882

(Springfield v. Harris, 107 Mass., 532 .) … They cite Newell v. Smith, 38 Wis., 39 , cited and approved in Sherburne v. Rodman, 51 Wis., 474 , which certainly seems to sustain their position, on principle, although the facts in the two cases are quite different.

Leo v. Keisling

329 Or. 273 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 5, 1999

See Armatta v. Kitzhaber, 327 Or 250, 286-89 , 959 P2d 49 (1998), and Deras v. … Plaintiffs point out that, in Crumpton v.

Credit Service Co. v. Payne

117 Or. 547 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 10, 1926

In Bunneman v. … J., and Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

State v. McDonnell

310 Or. 98 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1990

See, e.g., United States v. Crusco, 536 F2d 21 (3d Cir 1976); United States v. Brown, 500 F2d 375 (4th Cir 1974); cf. United *111 States v. Ammidown, 497 F2d 615 (DC Cir 1973); Correale v. … United States v. Brown, 500 F2d 375 (4th Cir 1974) (prosecutor fails to live up to his part of the plea bargain unless he supports the result recommended with some degree of advocacy). See also Santobello v.

Oregon Medical Ass'n v. Rawls

276 Or. 1101 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1976

Ass’n. v. … State Board of Medicine,-Ida-, 555 P2d 399, 413-14 (1976). 13 Questions of ripeness and standing may have lesser significance where "an issue of unusual importance is presented.” Dickman v.

Hitchcock v. McMinnville City Council

291 Or. 404 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 28, 1981

Neuberger v. … When Fasano v. Washington Co.

Jones v. Conn

39 Or. 30 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 29, 1901

Dec. 504 ); Benton v. Johncox, 17 Wash. 277 ( 61 Am. St. Rep. 912 ); Baker v. Brown, 55 Tex. 377 ; Davis v. Getchell, 50 Me. 602 ( 79 Am. Dec. 636 , 643, note). … In Fifield v.

Barber, Trustee v. Henry

197 Or. 172 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1953

Justice Rossman said in Ward v. … Ward v. Town Tavern et al., supra; Powell et al. v. Sheets et al., 196 Or 682 , 251 P2d 108 .

Schleiger v. Northern Terminal Co.

43 Or. 4 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 1, 1903

See, also, Brown v. Chicago & N. W. R. Co. 102 Wis. 137 ( 77 N. W. 748 , 78 N. W. 771 , 44 L. R. A. 579); Hulbert v. City of Topeka (C. C.), 34 Fed. 510 ; Davis v. St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. 53 Ark. 117 (7 L. R. … Co. v. Bohn, 27 Mich. 503 ; Cooper v. Lake Shore & M. S. Ry. Co. 66 Mich. 261 ( 33 N. W. 306 , 11 Am. St. Rep. 482 ); Wright v. Detroit, G. H. & M. Ry. Co. 77 Mich. 123 ( 43 N. W. 765 ); Lehman v. Eureka Iron & S.

Parker v. Harris Pine Mills, Inc.

206 Or. 187 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1955

Muldowney v. Middleman, 107 A. (2d) 173, 175; Builders Supply Co. v. McCabe, 77 A. (2d) 368. … In Allen et ux. v.

Barber v. Gladden

210 Or. 46 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1957

State v. … See State v. Peddicord, 209 Or 360 , 306 P2d 416 (64 OAS 109); and Franklin v. Brown, 73 W Va 727, 18 SE 405 .

Hamlin v. HAMPTON LUMBER MILLS, INC.

349 Or. 526 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 6, 2011

See Williams v. … See Tadsen v.

Baker v. Payne

22 Or. 335 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1892

(Keith v. Quinney, 1 Or. 364 .) In State ex rel. v. … (Walter A Wood Co. v. Caldwell, 54 Inch 270; 23 Am. Rep. 641 ; Stout v. Board of Comrs. 107 Ind. 343 ; 7 Rights, Rem. & Pr. § 3773; New England Car Co. v. B. & O. R. R. Co. 69 Am. Dec. 181 ; S. C. 11 Md. 81 .)

State v. Nix

Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 7, 2014

.”); State v. … In State v.

Jackman v. JONES

198 Or. 564 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1953

Brown v. Harding, 170 NC 253, 86 SE 1010 ; Owings v. Graham, 120 SC 408, 113 SE 279 ; Harvey v. … Lillie v.

Rogers v. Meridian Park Hospital

307 Or. 612 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1989

In Ellis v. … The physicians’ duty of care is codified in ORS 677.095, which provides: “A physician or podiatrist licensed to practice medicine or podiatry by the Board of Medical Examiners for the State of Oregon has the duty to use that

Roles v. Roles Shingle Company

147 Or. 365 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1934

And it is the action of the board of directors in authorizing the payment of this sum and the actual payment thereof which the plaintiff makes the principal basis of his demand for an accounting. … corporation is owned by a few, and all or most of the stockholders are actively engaged in the enterprise of the corporation, it is often the practice to transact ordinary business- without formal resolutions: First National Bank v.

State ex rel Rosenblum v. Nisley

367 Or. 78 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 24, 2020

See Fehl v. … See Kinzua Resources v.

Klamath Irrigation District v. United States

348 Or. 15 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 11, 2010

See Stevens v. … See, e.g., Brown v. Baker, 39 Or 66, 69 , 65 P 799 , 66 P 193 (1901); Oviatt v. Big Four Mining Co., 39 Or 118, 126 , 65 P 811 (1901) ; Carson v. Gentner, 33 Or 512, 518 , 42 P 506 (1898) (illustrating that usage).