Case law

Tusi v. Jacobsen

134 Or. 505 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 8, 1930

As stated in Dennis v. … In Nay v. Bernard, 40 Cal. App. 364 ( 180 P. 827 ), it was said: ‘ ‘ The principle established by Hopper v.

State v. Endsley

214 Or. 537 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 5, 1958

State v. … Mitchell v. Powers, 16 Or 487, 491 , 19 P 647 . See, also, Mitchell v. Powers, 17 Or 491, 492 , 21 P 451 ; North Pacific Presbyterian Board of Missions v. Ah Won, 18 Or 339, 344 , 22 P 1105 .

Bewley v. Graves

17 Or. 274 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1889

(Thompson v. Multnomah County, 2 Or. 34 ; Johns v. Marion County, 4 Or. 46 ; State v. Officer, 4 Or. 180 ; C. & G. Road Company v. Douglas County, 5 Or. 280 .) … (Tucker v. Harris, 13 Ga. 1 ; Cooper v. Sutherland, 3 Iowa, 114 .)

State ex rel. Carson v. Kozer

105 Or. 509 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 27, 1922

This was substantially the holding in State ex rel. v. … Brown, J., concurs in this opinion.

City of Salem v. H.S.B.

302 Or. 648 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 3, 1987

Realty Corp. v. State, 47 Misc. 2d 44 , 261 NYS2d 815 (1965); Sauvageau v. Hjelle, 213 NW2d 381 (ND 1973). … See, e.g., Board of Transp. v. Martin, 296 NC 20, 29, 249 SE2d 390 (1978); Sams v. Redevelopment Authority, 431 Pa 240, 244-45, 244 A2d 779 (1968); Jonas v. State, 19 Wis 2d 638, 644 , 121 NW2d 235 (1963).

Ream v. Ream

81 Or. 175 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 11, 1916

The same writer in Jones v. … The following precedents are to the same effect: Taylor v. Taylor, 11 Or. 303 ( 8 Pac. 354 ); Adams v. Adams, 12 Or. 176 ( 6 Pac. 677 ); Wheeler v. Wheeler, 18 Or. 261 ( 24 Pac. 900 ); Mendelson v.

Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Department of Revenue

302 Or. 582 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 3, 1987

Co. v. … Co. v. Browning, 310 US 362, 365 , 60 S Ct 968 , 84 L Ed 1254 (1940)); see also R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v.

Bartholmae Oil Corp. v. Booth

146 Or. 154 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1933

Mokelumne, etc. v. Woodbury, 14 Cal. 265 ; Robinson v. Bidwell, 22 Cal. 388 ; Davidson v. Rankin, 34 Cal. 505 .” Ellsworth v. Bradford, supra; Muller v. … Bradford, supra, citing Young v. Rosenbaum, 39 Cal. 646 ; Sonoma Bank v. Hill, 59 Cal. 107 ; Hyman v. Coleman, 82 Cal. 650 ( 23 P. 62 , 16 Am. St. Rep. 178 ); Brown v. Merrill, 107 Cal. 446 ( 40 P. 557 , 48 Am. St.

Stuart v. Pittman

350 Or. 410 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 3, 2011

Brown v. J. C. Penney Co., 297 Or 695, 705 , 688 P2d 811 (1984). A jury verdict can be set aside only if this court concludes that there was no evidence from which the jury could have found for the plaintiff. Id. … See Dodd v.

Seto v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District

311 Or. 456 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 5, 1991

Johns Shingle Co. v. … See Franchise Tax Bd. v.

Kaiser v. States Steamship Co.

203 Or. 91 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1954

the facts of his claimed injuries while aboard defendant’s vessel, and we are not able to say from his answers to these questions that it must be absolutely inferred that he was including in his answers the occurrence on board … A similar contention was answered by this court in Henderson v. U.P.R.R.

Benedict v. LEE, ADM.

198 Or. 378 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 29, 1953

Brown, Adm’r. v. Miles et al., 193 Or 466, 479 , 238 P2d 761 . Formal pleadings are not contemplated in a proceeding to have a probate homestead set apart to a surviving spouse. … In Moody v.

Parrott v. Carr Chevrolet, Inc.

331 Or. 537 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 11, 2001

Parrott v. … Hetzel v.

Norgard v. Busher Et Ux

220 Or. 297 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1960

In Seavey v. … Munro v. Eshe, 113 Colo 19, 156 P2d 700 (1944); Davis v. Haines, 349 Ill 622, 182 NE 718 (1932); Dice v. Brown, 98 Iowa 297 , 67 NW 253 (1896); Monroe v. Rawlings, 331 Mich. 49 , 49 NW2d 55 (1951); Murray v.

Aiken v. Shell Oil Co.

219 Or. 523 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1959

Plaintiff also cites Brown v. Kendall, 60 Mass 292. In that case the defendant in stopping a dog fight between plaintiff and defendant’s dogs, raised his stick and accidentally struck the plaintiff and injured him. … In Smith v.

State Ex Rel. Neidig v. Superior National Insurance

343 Or. 434 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 29, 2007

Each company was owned, directly or indirectly, by Superior Group and each had identical officers and directors (except for the formality that one New York resident served on CCCC’s board, but not on the other boards, because … See Abbott v.

Dyer v. Thrift

124 Or. 249 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 27, 1928

Thus in Oregon Lwnber S Fuel Co. v. Nolan, supra, the lessee was required to build upon the leased premises “a substantial rooming, boarding or apartment house building * * at a cost of not less than $6,000.” … In Myers v.

In Re Claussen

322 Or. 466 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 26, 1996

A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board found that the accused had violated DR 5-105(E) (current client conflicts) 1 and DR 1-102(A)(3) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), 2 dismissed the remaining … See In re Brown, 298 Or 285, 297 , 692 P2d 107 (1984) (serious misconduct involved in the “preparation of a false affidavit” warranted two-year suspension).

Grasle v. Portland Railway, Light & Power Co.

119 Or. 528 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1926

Ramp v. Osborne, 115 Or. 672, 690 ( 239 Pac. 112 ); Olds v. Hines, 95 Or. 580, 585 ( 187 Pac. 586 , 188 Pac. 716 ); Gregoire v. Portland Ry., L. & P. Co., 72 Or. 395 ( 143 Pac. 1103 ); Macchi v. Portland Ry., L. & P. … Burnett, Brown and Bean, JJ., concur.

Erickson v. Palmer

211 Or. 342 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 6, 1957

The Palmer will opens the residuary clause with this phrase: “All the rest, residue and remainder * * These words are the same as appeared in the Hilleary will construed in Brown v. … See Fouchek v. Janicek, 190 Or 251, 257 , 225 P2d 783 .