Case law

Marshall-Wells Co. v. Tenney

118 Or. 373 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1926

Fisk v. Stone, 6 Dak. 35 ( 50 N. W. 125 ). … J., and Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

NYTCO Services, Inc. v. Pacific Teollisuus, Inc.

285 Or. 123 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1979

Pacific claims that this provision is unenforceable as against public policy because Voyt v. … In Owen v.

Aldridge v. Saxey

242 Or. 238 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1965

Saxey’s employment as a laboratory technician, they were engaged in •the business of training, breeding and boarding dogs for profit. In Washington they maintained more than 40 dogs on 17 acres of land. … In the case where this did not appear, Hechelman v.

Fenton v. Scott

17 Or. 189 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1888

was a proceeding under the provisions of title 4, chapter 14, sections 2544-2548, Oregon Code, to contest the right of the defendant to the office of county judge of Lane County, to which he was declared elected by the board … (O’Gorman v. Richter, 31 Minn. 31 .)

LINNTON PLYWOOD ASSN. v. State Tax Commission

241 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1965

Physicians’ Serv. v. State Tax Com., 220 Or 487, 349 P2d 831 (1960), the taxpayer also sought exemption from payment of the Oregon Corporate Excise Tax. … Church v. Tax Com., 239 Or 65 , 396 P2d 212 (1964). No reason appears to accord judicial favor to worker cooperatives but not to churches, colleges, etc.

Whelpley v. Frye, Adm'x

199 Or. 530 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 12, 1953

Owens v. Holmes, 199 Or 332 , 261 P2d 383, 387 ; Wintersteen v. Semler, 197 Or 601 , 250 P2d 420 , 255 P2d 138, 147 ; Spain v. Oregon-Washington R. & N. Co., 78 Or 355, 369 , 153 P 470 , Ann Cas 1917E, 1104. … Spence, Adm’x v. Rasmussen et al., 190 Or 662, 688 , 226 P2d 819 ; Hartley v. Berg, 145 Or 44, 53 , 25 P2d 932 ; Weinstein v. Wheeler, 135 Or. 518, 529 , 296 P 1079 .

Joppa v. Clark Commission Co.

132 Or. 21 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 11, 1929

S.) 1); Groomer v. McMillan, 143 Mo. App. 612 ( 128 S. W. 285 ); Hunter v. Henry, (Mo. App.) 181 S. W. 597 ; Smith v. Mills, 112 Or. 496 ( 230 P. 350 ). … J., Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Bridenstine v. Gerlinger Motor Car Co.

86 Or. 411 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 23, 1917

Justice Cooley in Briggs v. Brushaber, 43 Mich. 330 ( 5 N. W. 383 , 38 Am. … Rep. 262 ); Bradford v. Neill, 46 Minn. 347 ( 49 N. W. 193 ); Bradbury v. Haines, 60 N. H. 123. 7. C. Tellefson was interested in a mortgage on a 90 acre farm owned by plaintiffs.

Caruthers v. Myers

Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 2, 2007

Petitioners rely on Kain/Waller v. Myers , 337 Or 36 , 93 P3d 62 (2004). … But there has to be some play in the joints of the ballot title writing process, if this court is to maintain its status as a law-enforcing court, rather than an editorial board.

Bartholmae Oil Corp. v. Booth

146 Or. 154 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1933

Mokelumne, etc. v. Woodbury, 14 Cal. 265 ; Robinson v. Bidwell, 22 Cal. 388 ; Davidson v. Rankin, 34 Cal. 505 .” Ellsworth v. Bradford, supra; Muller v. … Bradford, supra, citing Young v. Rosenbaum, 39 Cal. 646 ; Sonoma Bank v. Hill, 59 Cal. 107 ; Hyman v. Coleman, 82 Cal. 650 ( 23 P. 62 , 16 Am. St. Rep. 178 ); Brown v. Merrill, 107 Cal. 446 ( 40 P. 557 , 48 Am. St.

Curtis v. Keller

136 Or. 67 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 17, 1931

We think the jury, from these facts, might infer that there was a reasonable probability of permanent injury: Frint v. Amato, 131 Or. 631 ( 284 P. 183 ). … J., Brown and Campbell, JJ., concur

Moore v. Shell Oil Co.

139 Or. 72 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1932

Tweedie Trading Co. v. … J., Brown, Band and Belt, JJ., concur. Bossman and Campbell, JJ., did not participate in this decision.

Hunter v. Cunning

176 Or. 250 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 3, 1945

Co. v. … Thus, in Brown Cracker & Candy Co. v. Jen *279 sen, (Tex.) 32 S.

State ex rel Rosenblum v. Nisley

367 Or. 78 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 24, 2020

See Fehl v. … See Kinzua Resources v.

Dale v. Kulongoski

321 Or. 108 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 18, 1995

In Ransom v. … The Supreme Court of the United States used that descriptive terminology in Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, 431 US 209, 222, 262 , 97 S Ct 1782 , 52 L Ed 2d 261 (1977).

Fenter v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.

258 Or. 545 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 28, 1971

In Chaney v. … In Armbrust v.

Oregon Investment Co. v. Schrunk

242 Or. 63 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 24, 1965

sidewalk on that street for the passage of automobiles going into and leaving plaintiffs’ property, was with the public safety and convenience—with the safety in a heavily congested area of pedestrians, including persons boarding … As this court said in Brand v. Multnomah County, supra, 38 Or at 92 , quoting Northern Transportation Company v.

State v. Sokell

360 Or. 392 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 22, 2016

See State v. … The Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision designated him as a predatory sex offender in 2003.

Mitchell v. Ausplund

150 Or. 572 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1935

Lane v. National Ins. … Bank v. G. V. B. Min.

Clark v. Bundy

29 Or. 190 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1896

In King v. … And in Marsh v. Board of Supervisors, 38 Wis. 253 , the same judge says: “Until that right is asserted and possession taken, the heirs may maintain ejectment for the land.” See also Barker v.