Case law

Cranston v. West Coast Life Ins.

72 Or. 116 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1914

Justice McBride, in Francis v. Mutual Life Ins. … Co. v. Wanamaker & Brown, 115 Mo. App. 270 ( 90 S. W. 737 ). 3, 4.

State Ex Rel. Hupp Motor Car Corp. v. Kanzler

129 Or. 85 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 16, 1929

BROWN, J. … Ed. 1029 ); Cody Motors Co. v. Warren Motor Car Co. (D. C.), 196 Fed. 254 .” See, also, Deardorf v. Idaho National Harvester Co., 90 Or. 425 ( 177 Pac. 33 ), and the authorities noted; Winslow Lbr. Co. v.

Carrey v. Haun

111 Or. 586 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1924

’s Exr. v. … In Durbin v.

Harvey v. Getchell

190 Or. 205 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1950

With him on the brief was Neil Brown, of Cottage Grove. E.O. Immel argued the cause for respondents. On the brief were Immel & Milligan, of Eugene. … Crow v. Abraham, 86 Or. 99, 103 , 167 P. 590 ; Haney et al. v. Neace-Stark Co. et al., 109 Or. 93, 120 , 216 P. 757 , 219 P. 190 ; Adams v. Perry, 168 Or. 132, 145 , 111 P.2d 838 , 119 P.2d 581 ; Swingle v.

Neidert v. Portland Stages, Inc.

232 Or. 514 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1962

Fels v. East St. Louis & S. Ry. Co., CCA Mo, 275 F 881 (1921); Todd v. Louisville & N. R. Co., 274 Ill 201, 113 NE 95 ; Roberts v. Northwest Airlines, 201 Minn 89, 275 NW 410 . … The plaintiff testified that she boarded the bus, and carried onto the bus a small sack of fruit and fruit juices.

State Ex Rel. Ott v. Cushing

289 Or. 695 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 7, 1980

Brown, Atty. Gen., and John R. McCulloch, Jr., Sol. Gen., Salem. TONGUE, Justice. … Johnson v.

First National Bank v. Department of Revenue

294 Or. 60 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 16, 1982

See Bank of California v. Connolly, 111 Cap Rptr 468, 482, 36 Cal App3d 350, 371 (1973).” Hartung v. … Merkle v. Commission, 2 OTR 283 (1966); Jayne v. Department of Revenue, 6 OTR 251 (1975); Estate of Anderson v. Department of Revenue, 6 OTR 339 (1976), see note at 346.

Butts v. State Industrial Accident Commission

193 Or. 417 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1951

Carson v. State Indus. Acc. Comm., 152 Or 455 , 54 P2d 109 . … Moore v. Clarke, 171 Md 39, 187 A 887, 107 ALR 924 .

Leonard v. Bennett

165 Or. 157 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 25, 1940

Subject: Mortgages, p. 149, § 1747, citing Home Loan, Assoc. v. Wilkins, 66 Cal. 9 , 4 P. 697 ; Strode v. Miller, 7 Idaho 16 , 59 P. 893 ; Snow v. Haberer, 170 Ill. A. 265; Bailey v. Green, 68 Ill. A. 632; Brown v. … A. 89; Hull v. King, 38 Minn. 349 , 37 N. W. 792 ; Pancoast v. Duval, 26 N. J. Eq. 445; Ross v. Carroll, 33 S. C. 202, 11 S. E. 760 ; Hurxthal v. Hurxthal, 45 W. Va. 584 , 32 S. E. 237 .

Allen v. Hall

328 Or. 276 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1999

See, e.g., Hale v. Groce, 304 Or 281 , 744 P2d 1289 (1987) (permitting intended beneficiary of will to sue lawyer for failing to include gift to intended beneficiary in will as directed by testator); Brown v. … See, e.g., Western Helicopter Services v.

Ransom v. Roberts

309 Or. 654 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1990

ORS 250.085(2); 250.005(2); see Brown v. Roberts, 309 Or 667 , 791 P2d 488 (1990). … Glerum v.

Ortega v. Williard

245 Or. 331 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1966

Gladden, 242 Or 333 , 407 P2d 833 (1966), and Tucker v. Gladden, 245 Or 109 , 420 P2d 625 (1966). … The court said: “THE COURT: In the case of Alvin Lawson, the Court will suspend passing sentence for a period of two years during which time you will be on probation under the supervision of the Oregon State Board of Parole

Durbin v. Oregon Railroad

17 Or. 5 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1888

Railway Co., 62 Iowa, 624 ; Heize v. Railway Co., 71 Me. 636; Railroad Co. v. Beale, 73 Pa. St. 504; Railroad Co. v. Clarke Com., 73 Me. 168 ; Haas v. Grand R. R. Co., 47 Mich. 401 ; Tucker v. Duncan, 9 Fed. … It.thus appears to be,a duty imposed by the law upon, a person about to cross a railroad tp, use his eyes and ears, — to look out for sign-boards and signals, and, to listen, for bell and whistle, — and-, if the view, of.

Marcus v. Marcus

173 Or. 693 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 29, 1944

Plaintiff instituted this suit against defendant under the provisions of chapter 408, Laws of 1941, praying for a decree of separation from bed and board for a period of one year, with alimony, costs and attorney’s fees. … In Vnuk v. Patterson, 118 Or. 602 , 247 P. 766 , 47 A. L. R. 394, cited by appellant, plaintiff sued for damages for breach of promise of marriage.

Roberts v. Parrish

17 Or. 583 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 13, 1889

It is then alleged, in substance, that Jane *585 Roberts, between the first day of May, 1882, and the thirtieth day of July, 1884, became and was indebted to the defendant in the sum of $353 for services, board, washing,' … (Morrison v. Crawford, 7 Or, *589 472 .)

State v. Justus

11 Or. 178 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1883

In State v. … In Duer v.

Lake County v. Neilon

44 Or. 14 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 16, 1903

S. (5 Pet.) 373 ; United States v. Boyd, 40 U. S. (15 Pet.) 187 ; Myers v. United States, 1 McLean, 493 (Fed. Cas. No. 9,996); Bruce v. United States, 58 U. S. (17 How.) 437 ; Paw Paw v. … S. (9 Wheat.) 720 ; United States v. Vanzandt, 24 U. S. (11 Wheat.) 18 ; United States v. Nicholl, 25 U. S. (12 Wheat.) 505 ; Board of Supervisors v. Otis, 62 N. Y. 88 ; Crawn v. Commonwealth, 84 Va. 282 ( 4 S.

Williams' Bakery v. Coy

230 Or. 557 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 2, 1962

acting in the course of his employment and within the scope of his authority, even though the officer or agent does not in fact communicate his knowledge to the corporation through its other officers or agents, or its 'board … Also see Fleishhacker v. Portland News Pub. Co., 158 Or 476, 487 , 77 P2d 141 ; Dillard v. Olalla Mining Co., 52 Or 126 , 94 P 966 , 96 P 678 ; 3 Thompson, Corporations (3d ed.) 323, §1758.” Phillips v.

McCann v. Rosenblum

355 Or. 463 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 30, 2014

Initiative Petition 58 (IP 58) is essentially identical to Initiative Petition 47 (IP 47), which we considered in McCann v. Rosenblum, 355 Or 256 , 323 P3d 955 (2014). … Creates Oregon Distilled Liquor Board to encourage industry; OLCC retains regulatory functions. Other provisions.”

Melms v. Mitchell

266 Or. 208 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 2, 1973

In Foster v. … In Brown v. Hassenstab, 212 Or 246, 255 , 319 P2d 929 (1957), we recognized that the seller’s continued assurances that his representations are true can excuse the buyer’s delay in terminating the contract.