Case law

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Carini

354 Or. 47 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 15, 2013

(OSB 10125; SC S060708) En Banc On review from a decision of a trial panel of the Disciplinary Board. Argued and submitted April 30, 2013. Lee S. … See, e.g., In re Clark, 207 Ariz 414, 418, 87 P3d 827, 831 (2004) (concluding that accused lawyer’s negligent conduct constituted conduct prejudicial to the admin- istration of justice); Fink v.

Thompson v. Woolf

8 Or. 454 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1880

If his title is perfect, we think he would be in constructive possession without making an actual entry, for the heir becomes seised and presented without entry. (1 Washburn on Real Property, p. 48, sec. 81; Brown v. … (Brownwell v. Brownwell, 19 Wend. 369 ; Beebee and wife v. Griffing, 14 N. Y. 235 .) And such possession has been held sufficient in this state in practice in the circuit courts, in cases of partition.

Knight v. Hamakar

40 Or. 424 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1901

C.) 84 Fed. 324 ; Pittel v. Fidelity Mut. Life Assoc. 86 Fed. 255 ( 30 C. C. A. 21 ); State v. Bowen, 16 Kan. 475 ; Robinson v. Brown, 82 Ill. 279 ; State v. Postlewait, 14 Iowa, 446 . In White v. … Gaunt, 4 Or. 305 ; Farley v. Parker, 6 Or. 105 ( 25 Am. Rep. 504 ); Monastes v. Catlin, 6 Or. 119 ; Adams v. Petrain, 11 Or. 304 ( 3 Pac. 163 ); Steele v. Holladay, 20 Or. 70 ( 25 Pac. 69 , 10 L. R.

State v. Chatelain

347 Or. 278 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 22, 2009

See State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 368 , 800 P2d 259 (1990) (requiring corroboration of only death and criminal agency in aggravated murder case). … See, e.g., State v. Fischer, 232 Or 558, 560 , 376 P2d 418 (1962) (manslaughter); State v. Henderson, 182 Or 147, 190 , 184 P2d 392 (1947) (first-degree murder).

Pankey v. Oregon, California & Eastern Railway Co.

129 Or. 292 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 14, 1929

This case was decided against him in the Circuit Court and was appealed here where the decision of the lower court was affirmed: Pankey v. National Surety Co., 115 Or. 648 ( 239 Pac. 808 ). … Bean, Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. City of Eugene

276 Or. 1007 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1976

In Heatherly v. … Board of Education v. Allen, 392 US 236, 242 (1968).

S-W Floor Cover Shop v. National Council on Compensation Insurance

318 Or. 614 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 14, 1994

In Woody v. … See PGE v.

State Ex Rel. Hupp Motor Car Corp. v. Kanzler

129 Or. 85 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 16, 1929

BROWN, J. … Ed. 1029 ); Cody Motors Co. v. Warren Motor Car Co. (D. C.), 196 Fed. 254 .” See, also, Deardorf v. Idaho National Harvester Co., 90 Or. 425 ( 177 Pac. 33 ), and the authorities noted; Winslow Lbr. Co. v.

State v. Eastman

292 Or. 184 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1981

637 P.2d 609 (1981) 292 Or. 184 STATE of Oregon, Petitioner, v. Earl Glenn EASTMAN, [*] Respondent. State of Oregon, Petitioner, v. John Peter Kovach, [**] Respondent. … We granted the state's petition for review in this case, along with petitions in State v. Dillon, 292 Or. 172 , 637 P.2d 602 , and State v.

Adkinson v. Bartron

200 Or. 552 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1954

that at the time of the marriage of the parties, Katherine Thrapp was the owner of a small residential property of not a great deal of value; and that the plaintiff had for several years prior to their marriage roomed and boarded … Rowe v. Freeman, 89 Or 428, 437 , 172 P 508 , 174 P 727 .

Harvey v. Getchell

190 Or. 205 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1950

With him on the brief was Neil Brown, of Cottage Grove. E.O. Immel argued the cause for respondents. On the brief were Immel & Milligan, of Eugene. … Crow v. Abraham, 86 Or. 99, 103 , 167 P. 590 ; Haney et al. v. Neace-Stark Co. et al., 109 Or. 93, 120 , 216 P. 757 , 219 P. 190 ; Adams v. Perry, 168 Or. 132, 145 , 111 P.2d 838 , 119 P.2d 581 ; Swingle v.

Woolston v. Wells

297 Or. 548 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 14, 1984

For judicial recognition of this point, see, e.g., Brown v. Ivarans Rederi, A/S, 545 F2d 854, 863 n. 10 (3d Cir 1976).” Shepler v. … They cite Katter v.

Freightliner Corp. v. Department of Revenue

275 Or. 13 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 13, 1976

Sunday Lake Iron Co. v. Wakefield, supra at 353. Accord Charleston Assn. v. Alderson, supra; Rowley v. Chicago & N.W. Ry., supra; Southland Mall, Inc. v. Garner, supra. … Reversed. 1 ORS 311.207 provides, in part: "Whenever, after the return of the assessment rolls to the county assessor by the board of equalization, the assessor discovers or receives credible information, or if he has reason

Smith v. Vehrs

194 Or. 492 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1952

As stated in Bull v. … Brown, 58 Ind App 410, *505 108 NE 252 ; Farrant v. Troutman, 42 Okla 418, 141 P 776 ; Woodson v. Smith, 128 Va 652, 104 SE 794 .

State v. Saunders

14 Or. 300 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1886

(People v. Brown, 72 N. Y. 571 .) … In Gale v.

Bradbury v. Teacher Standards & Practices Commission

328 Or. 391 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 8, 1999

Downs v. Waremart, Inc., 324 Or 307, 309 , 926 P2d 314 (1996). Plaintiffs complaint contains the following factual allegations. … Lindemeier v. Walker, 272 Or 682, 684 , 538 P2d 1266 (1975).

Meno v. Otto

100 Or. 722 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 31, 1921

Appellant relies upon Davis v. … It is true that Section 286 of Freeman on Executions, cited in Davis v.

Hotchkiss v. Young

42 Or. 446 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 26, 1903

Uglow, 4 Or. 369 ; Atkins v. Bordman, 2 Metc. (Mass.), 457, 467 ( 37 Am. Dec. 100 ); McMillan v. Cronin, 75 N. Y. 474 . 2. … J., says in Burnham v. Nevins, 144 Mass. 88 ( 10 N. E. 494 , 59 Am.

US West Communications, Inc. v. City of Eugene

336 Or. 181 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 18, 2003

See Jarvill v. … See TVKO v. Howland, 335 Or 527, 534 , 73 P3d 905 (2003) (stating that principle); Brown v. Oregon State Bar, 293 Or 446, 449 , 648 P2d 1289 (1982) (same); Cummings Constr. v. School Dist.

Ex parte Case

70 Or. 291 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 23, 1913

Under such conditions the uninterrupted course of precedent in the Supreme Court of the United States, since Brown v. Maryland, 12 Wheat. 419 ( 6 L. … Rep. 976); McGregor v. Cone, 104 Iowa, 465 ( 73 N. W. 1041 , 65 Am. St. Rep. 522 , 39 L. R. A. 484); Smith v. State, 54 Ark. 248 ( 15 S. W. 882); State v. Montgomery, 92 Me 433 ( 43 Atl. 13 ); Croy v.