Case law

Jones v. Mitchell Bros. Truck Lines

273 Or. 430 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 6, 1975

In Brown v. … In addition to the foregoing reasons why this court should retain its. present rule and should not overrule Crow v.

North Pacific Construction Co. v. Wallowa County

119 Or. 565 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 16, 1926

That such a suit may be maintained, notwithstanding the provision of the contract just quoted, making the decision of the engineer final, is well settled in this state, the latest decision being that of Baker v. … the work, we conclude from all the circumstances of the case that the estimate of the engineer Griswold made in connection with the qMa.si-arbitration scheme and practically assented to by the other two members of that board

General Construction Co. v. Fisher

149 Or. 84 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1934

Ed. 792 ); Baltimore Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company v. Baltimore, 195 U. S. 375 ( 25 S. Ct. 50 , 49 L. Ed. 242 ); Metcalf v. Mitchell, 269 U. S. 514 ( 46 S. Ct. 172 , 70 L. Ed. 384 ); Gromer v. … R. 1260); Alward v. Johnson, 282 U. S. 509 ( 51 S. Ct. 273 , 75 L. Ed. 496 , 75 A. L. R. 9); Indian Territory I. O. Company v. Board of Equalization, 288 U. S. 325 ( 53 S. Ct. 388 , 77 L. Ed. 812 ); McCallen v.

Walker v. Fireman's Fund Insurance

122 Or. 179 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1927

Martin v. Hendershott, 82 Or. 58 ( 151 Pac. 706 , 160 Pac. 373 ); Credit Service Co. v. Peters, 116 Or. 138 ( 216 Pac. 742 ), and Lasene v. … Brown on Jurisdiction (2 ed.), § 21a.

Roesch v. Equitable Savings & Loan Ass'n

176 Or. 7 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1945

Miller, 166 Or. 80 , 110 P. (2d) 587 ; Brown v. Briggs, 134 Or. 184 , 292 P. 1034 . It must clearly appear that the omission was contrary to the intention of the parties: Shively v. Welch, 2 Or. 288 . … The word “advance”, as used in the foregoing quotation, means that the defendant would furnish money with the expectation of being repaid: Linderman v. Carmin, 255 Mo. 62 , 164 S. W. 614 ; Laflin & Rand Powder Co. v.

Simmons v. Friede Investment Co.

125 Or. 300 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1928

BROWN, J. The relationship between this plaintiff and defendant was that of landlord and tenant. … Co. v.

Groce v. Fidelity General Insurance Company

252 Or. 296 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1968

Gray, Aplnt. v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 422 Pa 500, 223 A2d 8 (1966); Brown v. Guarantee Ins. Co., 155 Cal App 2d 679, 319 P2d 69 , 66 ALR2d 1202 (1957). … Corp. v. Little, 103 Ariz 435, 443 P2d 690 (1968).

First Investment Co. v. Vulcan Underwriters of the North British & Mercantile Ins.

129 Or. 688 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 11, 1929

Co. v. … Brown, J., absent.

Oregon State Police Officers Ass'n v. State

308 Or. 531 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1989

The Court of Appeals relied on Lofft v. State Board of Higher Ed., 89 Or App 614 , 750 P2d 515 (1988). … In Deras v.

Carlon v. First Nat. Bank

80 Or. 539 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 23, 1916

Cas. 185; Hosegood v. Bull, 36 L. T. (N. S.) 620; Kinney v. Whiton, 44 Conn. 262 ( 26 Am. Rep. 462 ). In Jorden v. Money, 5 H. L. … Justice McNary, speaking for this court, said: “The money being on deposit at the time of its appropriation by the president, the board of directors, as the ‘mind’ of the corporation, having a general superintendency over

State v. Lerch

296 Or. 377 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 8, 1984

In State v. … State v.

Bradbury v. Teacher Standards & Practices Commission

328 Or. 391 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 8, 1999

Downs v. Waremart, Inc., 324 Or 307, 309 , 926 P2d 314 (1996). Plaintiffs complaint contains the following factual allegations. … Lindemeier v. Walker, 272 Or 682, 684 , 538 P2d 1266 (1975).

Olds v. Von Der Hellen

127 Or. 276 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1927

Co. v. Oregon R. & N. Co., 20 Or. 569 (26 Pac. 857 , 23 Am. St. Rep. 151 ). In the case last cited, speaking through Mr. … Bean, Rossman and Brown, JJ., concur.

Meyer v. Ford Industries, Inc.

272 Or. 531 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1975

Brown; *535 “9. Records relating to the increase in a loan from $1,369,492 to $1,500,000 from Roseburg Lumber Co. to Ford Industries between July 31, 1970 and October 26, 1970; and “10. … Thus, in Stone v.

Hurst v. Lake Co., Inc.

141 Or. 306 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1932

We quote from Nicoll v. … Brown, Belt, Campbell and Kelly, JJ., concur. Rand, J., concurs in the result. Bean, C. J., dissents.

Pearson v. Richards

106 Or. 78 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1922

that the parties intended that a covenant should run with the land, then in order to carry out such intention the covenant should *87 ordinarily be construed as a real covenant and therefore as one running with the land: Brown … v.

State v. Little

205 Or. 659 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 5, 1955

Little v. Gladden, supra at p. 20 ; Borden v. Alexander, 183 Or 488, 492 , 194 P2d 414 ; State v. Durham, 177 Or 574, 578 , 164 P2d 448 , 162 ALR 422 . … In Little v.

Feeney & Bremer Co. v. Stone

89 Or. 360 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1918

Co. v. … Brown Bros. Co., 208 N. Y. 90 ( 101 N. E. 797 , 50 L. R. A. (N. S.) 778); Nave v. Powell, 52 Ind. App. 496 ( 96 N. E. 395 ); McGill v. Hall (Tex. Civ.), 26 S. W. 132 ; Fitzpatrick v. D. M.

Mason v. Allen

183 Or. 638 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1948

In Lang v. … Diller v. Riverview Dairy, 133 Or. 442, 448 , 288 P. 401 . See, also, Hooning v. Henry, 106 Or. 605, 611, 213 P. 139 ; Pugsley v. Smyth, 98 Or. 448, 466 , 194 P. 686 ; Sorenson v. Kribs, 82 Or. 130, 145 , 161 P. 405 .

Griffin v. Griffin

95 Or. 78 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 3, 1920

A state, as parens patriae, has the undoubted right to determine the status or domestic and social condition of infant citizens domiciled within its territory: Brown on Jurisdiction, §§ 78, 79; Hood v. … In Beyerle v.