Case law

Neumann v. Liles

Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 3, 2016

Brown v. Gatti, 341 Or 452, 458, 145 P3d 130 (2006) (internal quotation marks omitted). Some defamatory statements are actionable per se— that is, without proof of pecuniary loss or special harm. … Co. v. St.

State v. Stokes

350 Or. 44 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 10, 2011

See Doggett v. … See Arizona v.

State v. Campbell

354 Or. 375 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 17, 2013

In State v. … It might indicate 380 State v.

Hamilton v. North Pac. S. S. Co.

84 Or. 71 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1917

Plaintiff’s cause of action arose on board a steamship owned in the State of California. … Rep. 935); Averill v. Southern Co., 75 Fed. 736, 740 .

Hyland v. Oregon Hassam Paving Co.

74 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1914

In the case of Sweeney v. … Dec. 362 ); Marshall v. Baltimore & O. R. Co., 16 How. (57 U. S.) 314, 335 ( 14 L. Ed. 953 ); Gil v. Williams & Davis, 12 La. Ann. 219 ( 68 Am. Dec. 767 ); Wood v. McCann, 6 Dana (Ky.), 366.

Aya v. Morson

90 Or. 647 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 28, 1919

So in Sellwood v. … In Milos v.

State v. Fiester

32 Or. 254 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1897

In State v. … Hawkins, 18 Or. 476 ( 23 Pac. 475 ); Territory v. Perkins, 2 Mont. 467 ; State v. Chapman, 6 Nev. 320 ;. State v. Rosemurgey, 9 Nev. 308 ; People v. Gaunt, 23 Cal. 156 ; People v. Williams, 24 Cal. 38 ; McDaniel v.

Multnomah County Fair Ass'n v. Langley

140 Or. 172 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 9, 1932

In State v. … J., Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Wights v. Staff Jennings, Inc.

241 Or. 301 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 10, 1965

Brown, 198 F Supp 78 (DC Hawaii), aff’d. 304 F2d 149 (9th Cir 1962); Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc., 32 NJ 358, 161 A2d 69 , 75 ALR2d 1 (1960); Goldberg v. … See Deveny v.

Dagg v. Department of Revenue

278 Or. 159 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 3, 1977

See Menasha Corp. v. Dept. of Rev., 6 OTR 313 , 317 n 2 (1976). … Moreover, Hanns v. Friedly holds only that it is not error for a court to consider incompetent evidence in the absence of timely objection.

Norton v. Coos County

113 Or. 618 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 27, 1925

Moreover, in Wilson v. … Precedents are there cited as follows: Howland v. Board of Supervisors, 109 Cal. 152 ( 41 Pac. 864 ); Fox v. City of Seattle, 43 Wash. 74 ( 86 Pac. 379 , 117 Am. St. Rep. 1037 ); State v. Blaisdell, 18 N. D. 31 ( 119 N.

Frangos v. Edmunds

179 Or. 577 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 18, 1946

The evidence discloses that the Armstrong car driven by witness Brown was immediately in front of the Edmunds’ car in which plaintiff was riding. … Scarpelli v.

Wayne v. Huber

134 Or. 464 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1930

Petition for rehearing denied December 16, 1930 On Petition por Rehearing ( 294 P. 590 ) BROWN, J. … This question was before our court in Branch v.

Taylor v. United States National Bank

248 Or. 538 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 17, 1968

In Moore v. … That was the basis of the decision in Brown, Adm’r v.

J. G. v. N. D. G.

348 Or. 525 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 15, 2010

See Armstrong v. … Brown v.

Lesser v. Pallay

96 Or. 142 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 6, 1920

In support of this doctrine our attention is directed to the case of Blundell v. Brettargh, 17 Ves. Jr. 231. … It is urged, further, that the award is invalid for the reason that no opportunity was given to the parties to appear before the new board of arbitrators for a hearing, and among others, the case of Cohn v.

Branchfield, Trustee v. McCULLEY

192 Or. 270 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 16, 1951

Siegle, 170 Or. 153 , 132 P. 2d 409 ; Orr v. Bauer, 156 Or. 409 , 67 P. 2d 770 ; Marion Automobile Co. v. Brown, 127 Or. 551 , 272 P. 914 ; Van Riper v. … Wilson, 50 Or. 282 , 90 P. 1011 , 92 P. 810 ; Robson v. Hamilton, 41 Or. 239 , 69 P. 651 ; Wright v. Craig, 40 Or. 191 , 66 P. 807 ; Bank of Colfax v. Richardson, 34 Or. 518 , 54 P. 359 ; S. Marks & Co. v. H. G. & E. G.

Wright v. Craig

40 Or. 191 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1901

Craig in carrying on the hotel, or boarding house, as it is sometimes called. This was conducted by her and in her name. … S. (6 Wall.) 299, 312 ; Bates v. McConnell, 31 Fed. 588 ; Herschfeldt v. George, 6 Mich. 456 ; Strong v. Lawrence, 58 Iowa, 55 ( 12 N. W. 74 ); Lyon v. Had *198 dock, 59 Iowa, 682 ( 13 N. W. 737 ); Boyd v.

Rader v. Barner

172 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 1, 1943

He was also cashier of the bank and a member of its board of directors. On June 28,1932, the bank was voluntarily placed in liquidation and B. B. Barner was appointed liquidating agent. … Campbell’s Gas Burner Co. v. Hammer, 78 Or. 612, 619 , 153 P. 475 .

State v. Boyer

84 Or. 513 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 22, 1917

Norman v. Kentucky Board of Managers, etc., 93 Ky. 537 ( 20 S. W. 901 , 18 L. R. A. 557), is a case very similar to tbe one at bar. … In State ex rel. v.