Case law

Engelgau v. Walter

181 Or. 481 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1947

This court, speaking upon the same subject in Brown v. … Babcock, 2 Johns. 203 ; Bostick v. Rutherford, 11 N. C. 83 ; Straus v. Young, 36 Md. 246 ; Smith v. Ege, 52 Pa. St. 419; Vinal v. Core, 18 W. Va. 1 ; Bornholdt v. Souillard, 36 La. Ann. 103 ; Frost v.

Rowe v. Freeman

89 Or. 428 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1918

Rep. 528 ); Mallow v. Walker, 115 Iowa, 238 ( 88 N. W. 452 , 91 Am. St. Rep. 158 ); McFarland v. Brown (Mo.), 193 S. W. 800 ; Sappingfield v. Sappingfield, 67 Or. 156 ( 135 Pac. 333 ); Tenbrook v. … Brown, 17 Ind. 410 ; Teegarden v. *455 Lewis, 145 Ind. 98 ( 40 N. E. 1047 , 44 N. E. 9 ); Kennedy v. McCann, 101 Md. 643 ( 61 Atl. 625 ); Prescott v. Johnson, 91 Minn. 273 ( 97 N. W. 891 ); Burwell v.

Scott v. Brogan

157 Or. 549 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1937

See Gillilan v. Portland Crematorium Assn., 120 Or. 286 ( 249 P. 627 ). In Gabrielson v. … In this connection, we are directed to the following: Perkins v. Brown, 132 Tenn. 294 ( 177 S. W. 1158 , Ann. Cas. 1917A, 124); Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co., 283 U. S. 494 ( 51 S. Ct. 513 , 75 L.

Fleischner v. Bank of McMinnville

36 Or. 553 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 24, 1898

Rogers, 14 Ala. 147 ; Fiegley v. Fiegley, 7 Md. 537 ( 61 Am. Dec. 375 ). We have not overlooked the cases of Morrison v. Shuster, 1 Mackey, 190 , and Brown v. Bank of Mississippi, 31 Miss. 454 . … The case of Brown v.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Paulson

335 Or. 436 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 5, 2003

had violated Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rule (DR) 2-106(A) by billing a client for time spent responding to the client’s complaint to the Bar against the accused. 1 A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board … Schroeder v. Schaefer, 258 Or 444, 466 , 483 P2d 818 (1971). The accused did not enrich Ring by responding to her complaint to the Bar.

Scott v. Fredericksen

239 Or. 225 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 4, 1964

The parties apparently left for some future decision by the board of directors the respective duties of the parties in the operation of the corporation’s business. … 'See Johnston v. Gilbert, 234 Or 350 , 382 P2d 87 (1963).

West Side Sanitary District v. Health Division of the Department of Human Resources

289 Or. 417 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 23, 1980

Affirmed as modified. 1 In the first case, West Side Sanitary Dist. v. … In the second case, State ex rel Rodriguez v.

Klein v. Portland

106 Or. 686 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 6, 1923

(Bailey et at. v. Kelly, 93 Kan. 723 ( 145 Pac. 556 , L. R. A. 1916D, 1220); Colorado Mtge. & Inv. Co., Ltd., v. Giacomini, 55 Colo. 540 ( 136 Pac. 1039 , L. R. A. 1915B, 364, and note 1 thereunder); Beehler v. … Co., 83 Or. 644 ( 163 Pac. 1181 ); Greenwood v. Eastern Oregon Power Co., 67 Or. 433 ( 136 Pac. 336 ); Jones v. National Laundry Co., 66 Or. 218 ( 133 Pac. 1178 ).

State v. Wyatt

331 Or. 335 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 1, 2000

Corp. v. … Brown, 310 Or 347, 356 , 800 P2d 259 (1990) (reasons for rule are to allow adversary to present its position and to permit trial court to understand and correct any error); Shields v.

Forest Products Co. v. Dant & Russell, Inc.

117 Or. 637 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1926

Sears, 8 Or. 209, 214; Hoskins v. Scott, 52 Or. 271, 276 ( 96 Pac. 1112 ); Fields v. Western Union Tel. Co., 68 Or. 209 ( 137 Pac. 200 ); McGinnis v. … J., and Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Kitterman v. Eagle Pine Co.

122 Or. 137 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 12, 1927

Citing numerous cases, among which are Eaton v. Blackburn, supra, and Pope v. Allis, 115 U. S. 363 ( 29 L. Ed. 393 , 6 Sup. Ct. Rep. 69), which support the text. … That warranty of the quality of goods survives the acceptance of the goods by the purchaser, see Feeney & Bremer Co. v. Stone, 89 Or. 360 ( 171 Pac. 569 , 174 Pac. 152 ); Austin Co. v.

Kinney v. Schlussel

116 Or. 376 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 8, 1925

Justice Wolvebton in Arment v. … J., and Brown, J., concur.

State Department of Agriculture v. Tillamook Cheese & Dairy Ass'n

251 Or. 393 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1968

Rhodes v. Little Falls Dairy Co., Inc., supra; Ark. Cotton Grs. Co-op. Assn. v. Brown, 168 Ark 504 , 270 SW 946 . … Assn. v.

Bailey v. Benton County

61 Or. 390 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 1, 1910

establishing, constructing, improving, and relocating county roads; providing for the establishment of road districts and the appintment of supervisors therein, and prescribing their duties and compensation; providing for a board … Justice Bean in State v. Shaw, 22 Or. 267 ( 29 Pac. 1028 ).

Ail Et Ux. v. City of Portland

136 Or. 654 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 1, 1931

*658 BROWN, J. … In the case of Lowell et al. v.

Couey v. Atkins

Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 16, 2015

Couey v. Brown, 257 Or App 434, 306 P3d 778 (2013). … TVKO v. Howland, 335 Or 527, 534, 73 P3d 905 (2003); see also Brown v.

Loveland v. Lally

99 Or. 483 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1921

“I am to have the privilege of submitting any question or business problem to your advisory board and their opinion and advice are to be furnished without additional cost. … In the case of Los Angeles Gas & Electric Co. v.

Krebs v. Perry

134 Or. 290 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 5, 1930

Defendants’ right to the use of the so-called Ewing, or Ehea ditch, is limited by the terms of the contract between the parties, and by the case of Ewing v. Rhea, 37 Or. … Dist. v. Mamero, 107 Or. 291 ( 214 P. 889 ).

Vale v. State Industrial Accident Commission

160 Or. 569 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 11, 1938

While in the woods he boarded at the Consolidated camp which was located about three miles from Anliker camp. … L., Verdict, 871, § 44; Doty v. Crystal Ice & Fuel Co., 122 Kan. 653, 659 , 253 P. 611; Freedman v. N. Y., N. H. and H. R. Co., 81 Conn. 601 , 71 Atl. 901 , 15 Ann. Cas. 464.

State v. Sullivan

139 Or. 640 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 22, 1932

Bidwell with the cooking and dishwashing in payment for her board and room. Mrs. … .” *653 And in State v.