Case law

Swensen v. Southern Pac. Co.

89 Or. 275 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1918

State, 2 Or. 66, 69 ; Winters v. George, 21 Or. 251, 257 ( 27 Pac. 1041 ); Pacific Elevator Co. v. Portland, 65 Or. 349, 387 ( 133 Pac. 72 , 46 L. R. A. (N. S.) 363); Messick v. Duby, 86 Or. 366, 369 ( 168 Pac. 628 ). … Crouch, 5 Bush (68 Ky.), 199; McMillan v. Board of Commrs. of Payne County, 14 Okl. 659 ( 79 Pac. 898 ). Nor is it sufficient, as said by Mr., Justice Story in Wood v. United States, 16 Pet. 342, 362 ( 10 L.

Andrews v. Neil

61 Or. 471 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1912

As said by Justice Eakin, in Stevens v. … See, also, Long v. City of Portland, 53 Or. 92 ( 98 Pac. 149 , 1111).

Small v. Paulson

187 Or. 76 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 24, 1949

Of the latter type is Comstock v. … Similar decisions are Texas Co. v. Dunn, (Tex. Civ. App.) 219 S. W. 300 , and Brown Brothers Lumber Co. v.

Leathers v. City of Burns

251 Or. 206 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 18, 1968

Oregon State Board of Dental Examiners, 294 U.S. 608 , 55 S.Ct. 570 , 79 L.Ed. 1086 . The legislature may select one phase of one field and apply a remedy there, neglecting the others. A.F. of L. v. … See Clark Oil & Refining Corp. v. Tomah, 30 Wis.2d 547 , 141 N.W.2d 299 ; City of Colorado Springs v. Grueskin, Colo., 422 P.2d 384 ; Humble Oil and Refining Co. v.

State v. Branton

33 Or. 533 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1899

To the same effect, see, also, Commonwealth v. Brown, 12 Gray, 135 . So, too, a joint indictment against all who participate in the commission of a crime is, in effect, a several indictment against each. State v. … In State v.

Wendl v. Fuerst

68 Or. 283 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 11, 1913

In Wright v. … Co. v. Brown, 30 N. J.

Pacific Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Department of Revenue

307 Or. 667 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 2, 1989

ORS 305.427; see also Twentieth Century-Fox Film v. Dept. of Rev., 299 Or 220, 225 , 700 P2d 1035 (1985); Donald M. Drake Co. v. Dept. of Rev., 263 Or 26, 32 , 500 P2d 1041 (1972). … See Coca Cola Co. v.

Moe v. Beck

311 Or. 499 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 25, 1991

Binhoff v. State, 49 Or 419, 422 , 90 P 586 (1907) (“the word ‘owner’ * * * has no fixed meaning”). Accord State v. The Calif. Ore. … See also Pedro v. January, 261 Or 582, 602 , 494 P2d 868 (1972).

Wright v. Craig

40 Or. 191 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1901

Craig in carrying on the hotel, or boarding house, as it is sometimes called. This was conducted by her and in her name. … S. (6 Wall.) 299, 312 ; Bates v. McConnell, 31 Fed. 588 ; Herschfeldt v. George, 6 Mich. 456 ; Strong v. Lawrence, 58 Iowa, 55 ( 12 N. W. 74 ); Lyon v. Had *198 dock, 59 Iowa, 682 ( 13 N. W. 737 ); Boyd v.

Day v. Salem

65 Or. 114 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 29, 1913

In People v. … Bird, 3 Or. 229 ; Silvey v. Lindsay, 107 N. Y. 55 ( 13 N. E. 444 ). In the case of Warren v. Board of Registration, 72 Mich. 401 ( 40 N. W. 554 , 2 L. R. A. 204), Mr.

Davis v. Dean Vincent, Inc.

255 Or. 233 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1970

Thus, in Ward v. … Brown, 36 Or. 221 ( 56 Pac. 170 ), and eases there cited; McAlpine v. Reicheneker, 56 Kan. 100 ( 42 Pac. 339 ); Woodward v. Van Hoy, 45 Mo. 300 .

Engelgau v. Walter

181 Or. 481 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1947

This court, speaking upon the same subject in Brown v. … Babcock, 2 Johns. 203 ; Bostick v. Rutherford, 11 N. C. 83 ; Straus v. Young, 36 Md. 246 ; Smith v. Ege, 52 Pa. St. 419; Vinal v. Core, 18 W. Va. 1 ; Bornholdt v. Souillard, 36 La. Ann. 103 ; Frost v.

Bjorndal v. Weitman

344 Or. 470 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 8, 2008

See Hatch v. … In Durnford v.

State v. Young

180 Or. 187 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 23, 1946

In State v. … Board of Commissioners, 117 Neb. 507 , 221 N. W. 433 , Aff. 116 Neb. 282 , 216 N. W. 815 ; Home Lumber & Coal Co. v. Hartford Mining Co., 58 Nev. 361, 368 , 81 P. (2d) 1063 ; Clough v. Shepherd, 31 N. H. 490; Gould v.

Cripe & Harris v. Davis

107 Or. 142 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1923

BROWN, J. Under Section 5878, Or. … A. 135); Keeney v. Oregon Ry. & Nav. Co., 19 Or. 291, 292 ( 24 Pac. 233 ); Richardson v. Portland Ry., L. & P. Co., 70 Or. 330, 336 ( 141 Pac. 749 ).

Goodwin v. Kingsmen Plastering, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 16, 2016

Shell v. … Still later in that hearing, Vice-Chair Walt Brown asked how, specifically, the proposed amendment would change existing law.

Hennig v. Carstens Packing Co.

136 Or. 267 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1931

The law defining the risks the servant assumes when he enters, and while remaining in, the service of the master is equally well determined, and it is only necessary to cite Johnson v. O.-W. R. & N. … J., Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Gatti

330 Or. 517 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 17, 2000

See David V. Isbell and Lucantinoi N. … See Hunter v.

Rader v. Barner

172 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 1, 1943

He was also cashier of the bank and a member of its board of directors. On June 28,1932, the bank was voluntarily placed in liquidation and B. B. Barner was appointed liquidating agent. … Campbell’s Gas Burner Co. v. Hammer, 78 Or. 612, 619 , 153 P. 475 .

Martin v. O. R. & N. Co.

58 Or. 198 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 27, 1910

Justice Brown in Houston & Texas Cent. R. Co. v, Mayes, 201 U. S. 321, 328 (26 Sup. Ct. 491: 50 L. Ed. 772 ). … R. v. Matthews, 174 U. S. 96 (19 Sup. Ct. 609: 43 L.