Case law

Tadsen v. Praegitzer Industries, Inc.

324 Or. 465 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1996

Tadsen v. … See Brown v. J. C.

STATE Ex Rel REED v. KUZIRIAN

228 Or. 619 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 1, 1961

“V. … Dellinger v. Arkansas State Board of Optometry, 1949, 214 Ark 562 , 217 SW2d 338 .

Gates v. Public Service Commission

86 Or. 442 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 3, 1917

Brown, Attorney General, and Mr. John 0. Bailey, Assistant Attorney General, for the petition on behalf of the Public Service Commission of Oregon. Mr. Ed F. Goad, for the petition on behalf of the City of Dallas. … In the case of Dallas v. Hallock, 44 Or. 246, 256 ( 75 Pac. 204 ), cited in the original opinion, the very question at issue here was discussed.

Northern Life Insurance v. Burkholder

131 Or. 537 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1930

v' “A. I do.” … Brown and Belt, JJ., absent. Rand, J., dissents.

Harlow v. Oregonian Pub. Co.

53 Or. 272 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 9, 1909

Corwin v. Hood, 58 N. H. 402; Dickinson v. Callahan’s Adm’rs, 19 Pa. 227 ; Howe Sewing Machine Co. v. Rosensteel (C. C.), 24 Fed. 583 . … E. 606 ); Weatherhogg v. Board of Com’rs, 158 Ind. 14 ( 62 N. E. 477 ); Staples v. Somerville, 176 Mass. 237 ( 57 N. E. 380 ) ; Freedman’s Savings Bank v. Shepherd, 127 U. S. 494 (8 Sup. Ct. 1250: 32 L.

Doyle v. City of Medford

347 Or. 564 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 4, 2010

of Regents v. … See State v.

Koos v. Roth

293 Or. 670 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 26, 1982

In Loe v. … v.

Yamhill County Mutual Telephone Co. v. Yamhill Electric Co.

111 Or. 57 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1924

Co. v. United El. R. R., 12 L. R. … J., and Brown and McCourt, JJ., concur.

Lexington Inv. Co. v. Watson

98 Or. 379 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 4, 1921

That was held by this court in Flegel v. Dowling, 54 Or. 40 ( 102 Pac. 178 , 135 Am. St. Rep. 812 , 19 Ann. Cas. 1159). … J., and Brown and Bean, JJ., concur.

HUNT v. Ketell

197 Or. 659 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 4, 1953

In Tieman v. … Also see Beard v.

In re Ellis / Rosenbaum

Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 20, 2015

See also State ex rel Currin v. … United States v.

Gaston v. Portland

48 Or. 82 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 3, 1906

This court in Dayton v. … In the case of Dowell v.

Hay v. Oregon Department of Transportation

301 Or. 129 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 20, 1986

The parties rely on this court’s statement in Perry v. … Illustrations of such an order are regulations of boards of health and other administrative bodies. “d.

American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. State

339 Or. 554 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 2005

In Goldberg v. … Franchise Tax Board, 463 US 159 , 103 S Ct 2933 , 77 L Ed 2d 545 (1983) (applying test to franchise tax); Commonwealth Edison Co. v.

SELLARDS ET UX. v. Malheur County

202 Or. 188 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 22, 1954

Thereafter and on September 5, 1934, the Board of Commissioners of Malheur county directed the sale of the lands last above described, and on November 3, 1934, the plaintiffs purchased them and received a sheriff’s deed conveying … Hertel v. Woodard, 183 Or 99 , 191 P2d 400 ; Bingham v.

Usinger v. Campbell

280 Or. 751 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1977

Wikstrom v. Davis, 211 Or 254, 268 , 315 P2d 597 (1957). … You sure you did not tell someone at the real estate board *757 that you granted an extension for the payment of the money? "A. No.” Mr.

State ex rel. v. Malheur County Court

54 Or. 255 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 25, 1909

So, too, in Shively v. … State v.

Burke v. State

352 Or. 428 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 27, 2012

See Friends of Yamhill County v. Board of Commissioners, 351 Or 219, 223-25 , 264 P3d 1265 (2011) (describing enactment of Measures 37 and 49); Corey v. DLCD, 344 Or 457, 460 , 184 P3d 1109 (2008) (same). … See State v.

Rose v. Oliver

32 Or. 447 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1898

See, also, Waterman’s Specific Performance of Contracts, § 41; Shakespeare v. Markham, 72 N. Y. 400 ; Drake v. Lanning, 49 N. J. Eq. 452 ( 24 Atl. 378 ). … Such is the holding in Gall v. Gall, 67 Hun, 600 ( 19 N. Y. Supp. 382 ). See, also, Drake v. Lanning, 49 N. J. Eq. *458 452 ( 24 Atl. 378 ); Brown v. Garten, 89 Iowa, 373 ( 50 N. W. 537 ); Davis v.

Hickey v. Settlemier

318 Or. 196 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1993

Gallagher v. … See Brown v. J. C. Penney Co., 297 Or 695, 705 , 688 P2d 811 (1984) (“One who objects to an exhibit on the ground that it is not to be received