Case law

Spencer v. City of Portland

114 Or. 381 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1925

McBride , 17 Or. 640 ( 21 P. 878 , 5 L.R.A. 115 ); McQuaid v. Portland V. Ry. Co. , 18 Or. 237 ( 22 P. 899 ); Kelly v. Multnomah County , 18 Or. 356 ( 22 P. 1110 ); Shattuck v. Kincaid , 31 Or. 379 ( 49 P. 758 ). … And, in a case of doubt, it ought to turn the scale: Brown v. United States , 113 U.S. 571 ( 28 L.Ed. 1080 , 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 648 , see, also, Rose's U.S. Notes).

Scott v. Ford

52 Or. 288 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 25, 1908

Cressey v. Tatom, 9 Or. 541 ; Goodwin v. Morris, 9 Or. 322 . … Gerrish v. Hinman, 8 Or. 348 ; Morse v. Macrum, 22 Or. 229 ( 29 Pac. 615 : 30 Pac. 73 ) ; Canfield v . Bostwisk, 21 Conn. 550, 553 . 5.

Wright v. Wimberly

94 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1919

In Goldsmith v. Brown, 35 Barb. (N. … In Myer v. Beal, 5 Or. 130 , the court says.

CenturyTel, Inc. v. Dept. of Rev.

Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 7, 2013

We can do that by interpreting the statutory definition incorporated in OAR 150-314.280- (B) consistently with Hoechst Celanese Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board, 25 Cal 4th 508, 22 P3d 324, cert den, 534 US 1040 (2001). … See State v. Montez, 309 Or 564, 604, 789 P2d 1352 (1990) (declining to reach constitutional arguments that had been raised only in passing). 320 CenturyTel, Inc. v. Dept. of Rev.

Gray v. Hammond Lumber Co.

113 Or. 570 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1924

BROWN, J. … This is decided in Lawton v.

Morback v. Young

58 Or. 135 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1911

In Davis’ Adm’r v. … In Hayes v. Va. Mut.

L. B. Menefee Lumber Co. v. MacDonald

122 Or. 579 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 23, 1927

J. 904; Kitchen v. Holmes, 42 Or. 252 ( 70 Pac. 830 ); Interior Warehouse Co. v. Dunn, 80 Or. 528 ( 157 Pac. 806 ). The counterclaim sets forth all of the elements suggested in Reichle v. … Brown, 39 Or. 285 ( 64 Pac. 451 ); H ornefius v. Wilkinson, 51 Or. 45 ( 93 Pac. 474 ); 2 R. C. L. 755.

Thayer v. Nehalem Mill Co.

31 Or. 437 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1897

At a meeting of the board of directors held in Astoria on October 19, 1891, one H. E. … And in Taylor v.

Rogers v. Southern Pacific Co.

190 Or. 643 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1951

In Turner v. … It is true that Smith v.

In re Complaint as to the Conduct of Jenkins

244 Or. 554 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 26, 1966

This matter has previously been before this court in a proceeding to determine whether this court, under the circumstances, had jurisdiction to discipline a judge for violation of the Canons of Judicial Ethics, Jenkins v. … The Board of Governors recommended permanent disbarment. We believe both recommendations to be unrealistic. Some of the charges of which the accused is guilty are extremely serious.

Califf v. Norman

210 Or. 198 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1957

This language closely parallels the following excerpt from Brown v. O. W. R. & N. … From Zint v.

Southern Oregon Co. v. Kight

112 Or. 66 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 22, 1924

The rule announced in the Archambeau case was followed in the case of Cathcart v. Marshfield, 89 Or. 401 ( 174 Pac. 138 ), and in Duniway v. … Burnett, MoCourt and Brown, JJ., concur. Costs retaxed September 16, 1924. On Motion to Retax Costs. ( 228 Pac. 832 .) BEAN, J.

De Tweede Northwestern & Pacific Hypotheekbank v. W. M. Barnett Estate

160 Or. 406 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 31, 1938

In Lewis v. … It was held in Epstein v. The State Ins. Co., 21 Or. 179 ( 27 P. 1045 ), approved in Brown v.

Eaid v. National Casualty Co.

122 Or. 547 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1927

L., § 102; Talbot v. Garretson, 31 Or. 256, 264, 267 ( 49 Pac. 978 ); Nye v. Bill Nye, 46 Or. 302 ( 80 Pac. 94 ); Capels v. Morgan, 81 Or. 692, 696 ( 160 Pac. 1154 , L. R. A. 1917B, 760). In Baldock v. … Brown and McBride, JJ., concur.

Wood Et Ux v. Baker Et Ux

217 Or. 279 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1959

Board of Education of City of New York, 172 NY Misc 770, 16 NYS2d 91 ; Gaynon et al. v. Statum, 151 Fla 793, 10 So2d 432; Tuttle v. Everhot Heater Co., 264 Mich 60 , 249 NW 417 ; Van Brode Milling Co. v. … In Allen v.

Stettler v. O'Hara

69 Or. 519 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 17, 1914

The latter is held in Malette v. … The legislature of the state of Massachusetts appointed a commission known as the Commission on Minimum Wage Boards to investigate conditions.

Holmgren v. Westport Towboat Co.

260 Or. 445 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1971

Gentry v. States Steamship Co., 229 Or 233, 248-49 , 366 P2d 880 (1961); and Kinney v. General Construction Co., 248 Or 500, 506-7 , 435 P2d 297 (1968). See also Politte v. … See State v. Dewey, 206 Or 496, 508 , 292 P2d 799 (1956); Burnett v. Western Pac. Ins.

Ford v. Oregon Electric Ry. Co.

60 Or. 278 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 26, 1911

In Aikin v. Albany, V. & C. R. R. Co., 26 Barb. (N. … Justice Moore in Brown v. Southern Pacific Co., 36 Or. 128 ( 58 Pac. 1104 : 47 L. R. A. 409: 78 Am. St.

Keller v. LONSDALE ET UX

216 Or. 339 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 13, 1959

(at p 527) See, also, Johnson v. Cass & Emerson, 91 Vt 103, 99 A 633, 634; Pratt v. York, 197 Ky 846, 248 SW 492, 495 ; and People v. … ORS 88.010; Brown v. Truax, 58 Or 572, 575 , 115 P 597 . As we have observed, the Lonsdales by their answer and cross-complaint seek a rescission of the contracts.

Markle v. Mulholland's, Inc.

265 Or. 259 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1973

Yuba Power Products, supra , on the ground that if we adopted such a theory we would be forced to extend strict liability across the board to situations not involving products. In Heaton v. … Also see Chapman v. Brown, 198 F. Supp. 78, 100 (D.