Case law

Livesley v. Landon

69 Or. 275 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1914

In Simon v. … In State v.

Colvig v. County of Klamath

16 Or. 244 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 23, 1888

It is a similar power to that exercised by an auditing board. … not exercise the power as a court, and that a practice of allowing a certiorari, as a court, to remove their own proceedings as commissioners, was regular and appropriate, and showed in his dissenting opinion in Striker v.

State Ex Rel. Van Winkle v. Peoples West Coast Hydro-Electric Corp.

129 Or. 475 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 6, 1929

Rep. 685); Nevada Ditch Co. v. Dennett, supra; Hough v. Porter, supra; Whited v. Gavin, 55 Or. 98 ( 105 Pac. 396 ). … Brown, J., did not participate in this opinion.

Sather v. Saif Corp.

357 Or. 122 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 9, 2015

See, e.g., Cato v. … Edwards v.

Morback v. Young

58 Or. 135 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1911

In Davis’ Adm’r v. … In Hayes v. Va. Mut.

Harisay v. Clarno

367 Or. 116 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 8, 2020

In this case, the secretary (at that time, Kate Brown) refused to certify IP 5 on the ground that it failed to meet the procedural requirements established by the Oregon Constitution. … Carson v.

Sargent v. Foland

104 Or. 296 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 31, 1922

A. 55); Williams v. Williams, 114 Wis. 79 ( 89 N. W. 835 ); Wence v. Wykoff, 52 Iowa, 644 ( 3 N. W. 685 ); Callahan v. Riggins, 43 Mo. App. 130 ; Moore v. Renick, 95 Mo. App. 202 ( 68 S. W. 936 ); Cowell v. … Bean, Brown and McCourt, JJ., concur.

Necanicum Investment Co. v. Employment Department

345 Or. 518 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 31, 2008

Necanicum Investment Co. v. Employment Dept., 214 Or App 385 , 164 P3d 1197 (2007). … However, in Barbara Parmenter Living Trust v.

Paxton-Mitchell Co. v. Royal Indemnity Co.

279 Or. 607 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 27, 1977

Burnett v. Western Pac., supra; Isenhart v. General Casualty Co., 233 Or 49, 54 , 377 P2d 26 (1962). … v.

Wright v. Wimberly

94 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1919

In Goldsmith v. Brown, 35 Barb. (N. … In Myer v. Beal, 5 Or. 130 , the court says.

Mitchell v. City of Portland

159 Or. 91 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1938

In addition to the decisions collected in the above-cited annotation, see the collection following Mattox v. Board of Education, 5 A. L. R. 568 ( 148 Ga. 577 , 97 S. E. 532 ). … Martin v.

Union Pacific Railroad v. Bean

167 Or. 535 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 9, 1941

A.; Astoria v. Kozer, 124 Or. 261 , 264 P. 445 . … The court is *552 not here asked to pass upon any question involving administrative functions or to determine a question of fact properly to be passed on first by an administrative officer or board.

State v. Corvallis & Eastern R.

59 Or. 450 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 19, 1911

Co. v. Dey (C. C.), 35 Fed. 866 (1 L. R. … Co. v. Minnesota, 193 U. S. 53 (24 Sup. Ct. 396: 48 L. Ed. 614 ). In State ex rel. v. Atlantic Coast Line R.

Powell v. Dayton, Sheridan & Grand Ronde R. R.

16 Or. 33 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1888

(Holford v. Dunnett, 7 Mees. & W. 352.) It is not a covenant to repair generally, but to so use the property as to avoid the necessity for repairs, as far as possible. *36 (Horsefall v. Mather, 7 Holt, 9; Brown v. … (Cook v. Champlain Trans. Co. 1 Denio, 91 ; Parrott v. Barney, 2 Abb. Adm. 197 .)

Rogers v. Southern Pacific Co.

190 Or. 643 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1951

In Turner v. … It is true that Smith v.

Skyline Assembly of God v. Department of Revenue

274 Or. 259 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 12, 1976

See Clarkston v. Bridge, 273 Or 68 , 539 P2d 1094 (1975); Kankkonen v. Hendrickson et al, 232 Or 49, 67 , 374 P2d 393 , 99 ALR2d 296 (1962). … It is recognized that in many such organizations, office-holders and board members change frequently and are not business oriented.

Johnson v. Sheridan Lumber Co.

51 Or. 35 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 4, 1908

Beck, 9 Or. 325 ; Booth v. Moody, 30 Or. 222 ( 46 Pac. 884 ); Savage v. Savage, 36 Or. 268 ( 59 Pac. 461 ). 4. … As supporting this view, see Jones, Ev. §296; Granite Gold Mining Co. v. Maginness, 118 Cal. 131 ( 50 Pac. 269 ); Mott v. Consumers’ Ice Co. 73 N. Y. 543 ; Gildersleeve v. Landon, 73 N. Y. 609 .

L. B. Menefee Lumber Co. v. MacDonald

122 Or. 579 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 23, 1927

J. 904; Kitchen v. Holmes, 42 Or. 252 ( 70 Pac. 830 ); Interior Warehouse Co. v. Dunn, 80 Or. 528 ( 157 Pac. 806 ). The counterclaim sets forth all of the elements suggested in Reichle v. … Brown, 39 Or. 285 ( 64 Pac. 451 ); H ornefius v. Wilkinson, 51 Or. 45 ( 93 Pac. 474 ); 2 R. C. L. 755.

Teacher Standards & Practices Commission v. Bergerson

342 Or. 301 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 8, 2007

The school board ultimately accepted that recommendation and terminated petitioner, effective January 2002. Petitioner appealed her termination to the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board (FDAB). … Bergerson v. Salem-Keizer School Dist., 185 Or App 649 , 60 P3d 1126 (2003).

Spencer v. City of Portland

114 Or. 381 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1925

McBride , 17 Or. 640 ( 21 P. 878 , 5 L.R.A. 115 ); McQuaid v. Portland V. Ry. Co. , 18 Or. 237 ( 22 P. 899 ); Kelly v. Multnomah County , 18 Or. 356 ( 22 P. 1110 ); Shattuck v. Kincaid , 31 Or. 379 ( 49 P. 758 ). … And, in a case of doubt, it ought to turn the scale: Brown v. United States , 113 U.S. 571 ( 28 L.Ed. 1080 , 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 648 , see, also, Rose's U.S. Notes).