Case law

State Ex Rel. Nilsen v. Cushing

253 Or. 262 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1969

Nordling v. Johnston, 205 Or at 335 . In State ex rel Nilsen v. … ORS 34.110; Ruonala v. Board of County Comm., 212 Or 309 , 319 P2d 898 (1957).

Lowe v. City of Eugene

254 Or. 518 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1969

Vitale, 370 US 421 , 82 S Ct 1261 , 8 L Ed 2d 601 , 86 ALR2d 1285 (1962): McCollum v. Board of Education, 333 US 203 , 68 S Ct 461 , 92 L Ed 649 , 2 ALR2d 1338 (1948). … Torcaso v. Watkins, 367 US 488 , 81 S Ct 1680 , 6 L Ed 2d 982 (1961). As it was expressed by Mr. Justice Jackson in Board of Education v.

Thayer v. Nehalem Mill Co.

31 Or. 437 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1897

At a meeting of the board of directors held in Astoria on October 19, 1891, one H. E. … And in Taylor v.

Weinhard v. Commercial National Bank

41 Or. 359 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 3, 1902

In Hulitt v. … Bell, 85 Fed. 98 , the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio, in an able and well-reasoned opinion by Judge Sage, held that an assessment levied by a board of directors of a national bank to

Pratt v. Armenakis

335 Or. 35 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 24, 2002

See Smith v. … See Cleveland Board of Education v.

Anderson v. Chambliss Et Ux.

199 Or. 400 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1953

In Christman v. … In Coffey v. Smith, 52 Or 538, 540 , 97 P 1079 , it is stated: “The right to assert and perfect a mechanic’s lien is a statutory privilege (Brown v.

Rich v. Cooper

234 Or. 300 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1963

Wyckoff v. Mutual Life Ins. Co., 173 Or 592 , 147 P2d 227 (1944) and Judson v. … Linkhart v. Savely, 190 Or 484 , 227 P2d 187 (1951); Cain v. Skillin, 219 Ala 228, 121 So 521, 64 ALR 1022 (1929); Mong Ming Club v. Tang, 77 Ariz 63, 266 P2d 1091 (1954); Brown v.

Top Service Body Shop, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance

283 Or. 201 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 1, 1978

Brown, The Rise and Threatened Demise of the Prima Facie Tort Principle, 54 Northw U L Rev 563 (1959). … See, e.g., State v. Brown, 245 Or 245, 246 , 421 P2d 692 (1966); Dunkelberger v.

Felts v. Boyer

73 Or. 83 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 10, 1914

Co. v. Bryan, 16 Miss. (8 Smedes & M.) 234; Davis v. Davis, 26 Cal. 23 ( 85 Am. Dec. 157 ); Merchants’ Nat. Bank v. Abernathy, 32 Mo. App. 211 ; Hogan v. Page, 69 U. S. (2 Wall.) 605 ( 17 L. Ed. 854 ); Malone v. … Robbins, 46 Ill. 276 ; Lord v. Hawkins, 39 Minn. 73 ( 38 N. W. 689 ); Boeing v. McKinley, 44 Minn. 392 ( 46 N. W. 766 ); Brown v. Conger, 10 Neb. 236 ( 4 N. W. 1009 ); Green v. Goodloe, 7 Mo. 25 ; Albright v.

In re Complaint as to the Conduct of Jenkins

244 Or. 554 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 26, 1966

This matter has previously been before this court in a proceeding to determine whether this court, under the circumstances, had jurisdiction to discipline a judge for violation of the Canons of Judicial Ethics, Jenkins v. … The Board of Governors recommended permanent disbarment. We believe both recommendations to be unrealistic. Some of the charges of which the accused is guilty are extremely serious.

Jenkins v. Jenkins

103 Or. 208 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 14, 1922

BROWN, J. — A question presented to us is the degree of proof required to establish the charge of adultery in a suit for the dissolution of the marriage contract. … App. 644 ; Names v. Names, 67 Iowa, 383 ( 25 N. W. 671 ); Crane v. Crane, 128 Md. 214 ( 97 Atl. 535 ); Kerr v. Kerr, 134 App. Div. 141 ( 118 N. Y. Supp. 801 ); Langstaff v. Langstaff (Ohio), Wright, 148; Griffin v.

Holt v. Guaranty & Loan Co.

136 Or. 272 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 10, 1931

BROWN, J. … In Harth v.

Starkweather v. Hoss

126 Or. 630 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 25, 1928

Richardson v. Young, 122 Tenn. 471 ( 125 S. W. 664 , 686); 4 Words & Phrases, 2d Series, p. 1122. In Heney v. … Brown, J., concurs in the result.

Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. McBride

295 Or. 398 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 26, 1983

Cook v. Michael, supra. Prior to Cook v. … Brown v. Multnomah County Dist.

Farmers & Fruit-growers' Bank v. Davis

93 Or. 655 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1919

It was held in Fraley v. … The objection is not well taken: See Emery v. Brown, 63 Or. 264 ( 127 Pac. 682 ).

West v. Kern

88 Or. 247 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1918

A witness, who was on board the lug-boat, stated that he saw the name of Capel on the barge, and the No. 1055; but that when the men in the employ of the defendants were shown to him at their , wharf, he could not identify … In Knust v.

Hill v. Carlstrom

216 Or. 300 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 29, 1959

Jasper v. Wells, 173 Or 114, 127 , 144 P2d 505 ; Allister v. … Payne et al., 93 Fla 1085, 113 So 378; Brown v. Selfridge, 224 US 189 , 32 S Ct 444 ; Straka v. Voyles, 69 Utah 123 , 252 P 677 ; Puutio v. Roman, 76 Mont 105 , 245 P 523 ; Griswold v. Griswold, 143 Cal 617, 77 P 672 .

L. B. Menefee Lumber Co. v. Gamble

119 Or. 224 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 3, 1925

BROWN, J. The plaintiff is an Oregon corporation engaged in the manufacture and sale of lumber and other forest products. … Welch, 2 Or. 288 ; Newsom v. Greenwood, 4 Or. 119 ; Evarts v. Steger, 5 Or. 147 ; Lewis v. Lewis, 5 Or. 169 ; Stephens v. Murton, 6 Or. 193; McCoy v. Bayley, 8 Or. 196 ; Foster v.

Webster v. Rogers

87 Or. 547 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1918

Supp. 609 ); Middlesboro Waterworks v. Neal, 105 Ky. 586 ( 49 S. W. 428 ); McCall v. White, 73 Ala. 562 ; Rucker v. Dooley, 49 Ill. 377 ( 95 Am. Dec. 614 ); Harmon v. Larned, 58 Ill. 167, 169 ; Cottingham v. … That the order of confirmation concludes this question is intimated in Leinenweber v. Brown, 24 Or. 548, 552 ( 34 Pac. 475 , 38 Pac. 4 ). 7. The defense of laches asserted by the defendants is clearly made out.

McGilchrist v. Portland E. & E. Ry. Co.

79 Or. 91 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1916

In Raiha v. … To the same effect, see, also, Parker v. Monteith, 7 Or. 279 ; State v. Jancigaj, 54 Or. 361 ( 103 Pac. 54 ); Willis v. Horticultural Fire Relief, 69 Or. 293 (Ann. Cas. 1916A, 449, 137 Pac. 761 ); State ex rel. v.