Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
8,515 results
2.45s
Pacific Lumber Co. v. Prescott
40 Or. 374 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 13, 1902
Justice Brewer, in Kneeland v. American L. & T. Co. 136 U. S. 90 (10 Sup. … Bank v. Pope, 19 Or. 35 ( 26 Pac. 622 ); Coulter v. Portland Trust Co. 20 Or. 469 ( 26 Pac. 565 , 27 Pac. 266 ); Nodine v. Shirley, 24 Or. 250 ( 33 Pac. 379 ); Grant v. Paddock, 30 Or. 312 ( 47 Pac. 712 ); Cochran v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedSchool District No. 1 v. Shull
160 Or. 225 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1938
This is a mandamus proceeding to compel the Board of County Commissioners of Multnomah county to forthwith levy a tax for school purposes upon all the taxable property in Multnomah county for the year 1939, which aggregates … Plaintiff cites Morris, Mather & Co. v. Port of Astoria, 141 Or. 251 ( 15 P. (2d) 385 ). In that case, plaintiff was the owner of overdue interest coupons in the amount of $12,535, issued by the Port of Astoria.
Cited 2 timesPublishedDalrymple v. Covey Motor Car Co.
66 Or. 533 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 23, 1913
Negligence (5 ed.), Section 162, reads: “If the hirer is vested for the time with exclusive control with the right to discharge the servants and to employ others, he alone is responsible for their defaults”: See, also, Brown … v.
Cited 28 timesPublishedDept. of Human Services v. T. J. N.
Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 7, 2023
Dept. of Human Services v. T. J. N., 323 Or App 258, 268-69, 522 P3d 914 (2022); see Rogue Advocates v. … Assn. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAlaska Airlines, Inc. v. Deparment of Revenue
307 Or. 406 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 22, 1989
Braniff Airways v. Nebraska Board, 347 US 590, 600-02 , 74 S Ct 757 , 98 L Ed 967 (1954). … Co. v. Tax Comm’n., supra.
Cited 7 timesPublished26 Or. 466 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1895
This is said to be the better and more usual practice (Perkins v. State, 66 Ala. 457 ; Stuart v. … Were it otherwise, the particular conversions could never be ascertained or proven, and there would have to be, in some cases, almost as many counts in an indictment as there were dollars of the money embezzled”: Brown v.
Cited 81 timesPublished108 Or. 514 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 31, 1923
S.) 83); Veterans’ Welfare Board v. Jordan, 189 Cal. 124 ( 208 Pac. 284 , 22 A. L. R. 1515); Judson on Taxation (2 ed.), 392. … Reclamation Board v. Clausen, 110 Wash. 525 ( 188 Pac. 538 , 14 A. L. R. 1133).
Cited 23 timesPublished191 Or. 603 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 23, 1951
See Brown v. Irwin, 187 Or. 462 , 212 P. 2d 729 . In the meantime, on March 4,1950, Addie B. … Jur., Executors and Administrators, 876, § 898; Kane v. Paul, 39 U.S. 33 , 10 L. ed. 341; Hanover Fire Ins. Co. v. Street, 234 Ala. 537 , 176 So. 350 ; Kent v.
Cited 0 timesPublished297 Or. 460 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 24, 1984
State v. Turner, 296 Or 451 , 676 P2d 873 (1984); State v. Brown, 296 Or 461 , 676 P2d 877 (1984). … State v.
Cited 33 timesPublished114 Or. 657 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 14, 1925
A. 152 ); State v. Peterson, 27 Wyo. 185 ( 194 Pac. 342 , 13 A. L. R. 1284); Giles v. United States, 284 Fed. 208 ; United States v. Kaplan, 286 Fed. 963 ; Atlantic Food Products Co. v. McClure, 288 Fed. 982 ; Smith v. … Brown, 3 Mo. 127 ( 23 Am. Dec. 693 ).
Cited 12 timesPublished196 Or. 586 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 26, 1952
State v. … State v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedMakino v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Co.
155 Or. 317 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1936
Co. v. … The plaintiff had a right to construe the commands of his foreman as a representation that if he would obey the work would progress in safety: Cave v. Brown & McCabe, Stevedores, Inc., supra, and 18 R. C.
Cited 4 timesPublished43 Or. 109 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 30, 1903
Glass, 5 Or. 73 ; State v. Anderson, 10 Or. 448 ; State v. Ching Ling, 16 Or. 419 ( 18 Pac. 844 ); State v. Henderson, 24 Or. 100 ( 32 Pac. 1030 ); State v. Brown, 28 Or. 147 ( 41 Pac. 1042 ); State v. … In State v.
Cited 34 timesPublished115 Or. 178 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 4, 1925
the subject of the computation of inheritance taxes, but in our judgment the questions here involved are set at rest by an opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States- delivered June 1, 1925, in the case of Frick v. … Aeeirmed, Brown, J., took no part in the hearing or decision of this case.
Cited 1 timesPublishedPrice v. United Pacific Casualty Insurance
153 Or. 259 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 18, 1936
In Oatman v. … In Fleischer v. Maryland Casualty Co., 108 Pa. Sup. Ct. 461 ( 164 Atl. 824 ), a similar result was reached. In Lewis v.
Cited 3 timesPublished202 Or. 656 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 8, 1954
In State v. … State v. Dodson, 4 Or 64 ; State of Oregon v. Spencer, 6 Or 152 ; State of Oregon v. Brown, 7 Or 186 ; State v. Ah Lee, 18 Or 540 , 23 P 424 ; State v. McAllister, 67 Or 480 , 136 P 354 ; State v.
Cited 23 timesPublished112 Or. 215 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 7, 1924
Supp. 379 ); Ramsey v. Capshaw, 71 Ark. 408 ( 75 S. W. 479 ); Brown v. Buckingham, 11 Abb. Pr. 387 , 21 How. Pr. 190 ; Wilson v. Hughes, 94 N. C. 182 . … Trummer, 50 Or. 287 ( 91 Pac. 1077 ); Reardon v. Higgins, 39 Ind. App. 363 ( 79 N. E. 208 ); Brown v. Buckingham , 11 Abb. Pr. (N. Y.) 387; Smith v. French, 141 N. C. 1 ( 53 S. E. 435 ); Aultman v.
Overruled by MacK Trucks, Inc. v. Taylor, 227 Or. 376 (1961)Cited 22 timesPublished159 Or. 91 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1938
In addition to the decisions collected in the above-cited annotation, see the collection following Mattox v. Board of Education, 5 A. L. R. 568 ( 148 Ga. 577 , 97 S. E. 532 ). … Martin v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedNecanicum Investment Co. v. Employment Department
345 Or. 518 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 31, 2008
Necanicum Investment Co. v. Employment Dept., 214 Or App 385 , 164 P3d 1197 (2007). … However, in Barbara Parmenter Living Trust v.
Cited 5 timesPublished46 Or. 574 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1905
Case, 80 Md. 36 ( 30 Atl. 571 ); Ferguson v. Davis County, 57 Iowa, 601 ( 10 N. W. 906 ); Buffum v. Harris, 5 R. I. 243, 250. … In further support of the views herein entertained, see Bonebrake v. Board of Comrs. 141 Ind. 62 ( 40 N. E. 141 ); Rapho v. Moore, 68 Pa. 404 ( 8 Am. Rep. 202 ).
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna