Case law

Busch v. Robinson

46 Or. 539 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1905

assignment of error relates to the overruling of a demurrer to the complaint, and it is now urged that it is insufficient after verdict, in that it does not state that plaintiff was without knowledge of the defective and broken board … Co. 21 Or. 159 ( 27 Pac. 954 ); Johnston v. Oregon Short Line Ry. Co. 23 Or. 94 ( 31 Pac. 283 ); Stager v. Troy Laundry Co. 38 Or. 480 ( 63 Pac. 645 , 53 L. R. A. 459); Miller v.

State v. Perry

336 Or. 49 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 9, 2003

See Vannatta v. Keisling, 324 Or 514, 530 , 931 P2d 770 (1997) (using “dictionary relevant to that time” in interpreting constitutional provision); see also Tipperman v. … Gaston v. Parsons, 318 Or 247, 253 , 864 P2d 1319 (1994).

Northwest Alliance for Market Equality v. Department of Revenue

318 Or. 129 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1993

PGE v. Bureau of Labor and Industries, supra, 317 Or at 611 . … In NW Medical Lab. v.

State v. Linville

127 Or. 565 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1928

No. 14,568; People v. Murray, 54 Hun, 406 ( 7 N. Y. Supp. 548 ); United States v. Liddle, Fed. Cas. No. 15,598; United States v. Ortega, Fed. Cas. No. 15,971. … J., and Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

State v. Zweigart

344 Or. 619 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 26, 2008

See State v. … See State v.

State v. Foster

296 Or. 174 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1983

Over 20 years ago, in Nielsen v. … See, e.g., United States v. Oakes, 565 F.2d 170 (1st Cir. 1977).” United States v. Cook, 608 F2d 1175, 1186 (9th Cir 1979).

Cole v. FOGEL

210 Or. 257 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1957

Defendant lone was then married to Robert Overholser, who died in 1938. lone Overholser then went to work for plaintiff, apparently for room, board, and a monthly wage (the amount of which is in dispute). … Bogle v. Paulson, 185 Or 211, 228 , 201 P2d 733 ; Kramer v. Taylor et al., 200 Or 640, 647 , 266 P2d 709 . Clear and convincing evidence is required to establish either a resulting trust (Holohan v.

Whittle v. Wolff

249 Or. 217 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1968

See also Cronkhite v. Falkenstein, 352 P2d 396 (Okla 1960) (gypsum); Atwood v. Rodman, 355 SW2d 206 (Tex Civ App 1962) (limestone); Watkins v. … Certain-Teed Products Corp., 231 SW2d 981 (Tex Civ App 1950) (sand and gravel); Heinatz v. Allen, 147 Tex '512, 217 SW2d 994 (1949) (limestone); State Land Board v.

Adelsperger v. Elkside Development LLC

373 Or. 621 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 1, 2025

Knepper v. Brown, 345 Or 320, 323, 195 P3d 383 (2008); see also Woodbury v. … See Brown v. J.C.

Peterkort & Co. v. East Washington County Zoning District

211 Or. 188 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1957

in Board of Directors v. … A zoning district, which is created in pursuance of the police power (Page v. City of Portland, 178 Or 632, 637 , 165 P2d 280 ), is in the latter category.

Fischer v. Howard

201 Or. 426 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1954

Neal v. Haight, 187 Or 13, 32 , 206 P2d 1197 ; Lyons v. Browning, 170 Or 350, 354 , 133 P2d 599 ; Timmins v. Hale, 122 Or 24, 32 , 256 P. 770 ; Spokane County v. … See Lyons v. Browning, supra, 170 Or 354 .

In Re Schenck

320 Or. 94 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 9, 1994

In Jenkins v. … “After this court issued its decision in State ex rel Hopkins v.

United States Nat. Bank v. Holton

99 Or. 419 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1921

BROWN, J. This lawsuit is a result of the perfidy of one Holton and of the negligence of one William Yaetz, the defendant and cross-complainant. … In Bamberger v.

Turney v. J. H. Tillman Co.

112 Or. 122 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 23, 1924

In Babcoch v. … J., and Brown, J., concur.

State v. Johnson

340 Or. 319 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 30, 2006

See, e.g., State v. … State v.

Burke v. Children's Services Division

288 Or. 533 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1980

See Megdal v. … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 US 564 , 92 S Ct 2701 , 33 L Ed 2d 548 (1972); Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 US 254 , 90 S Ct 1011 , 25 L Ed 2d 287 (1970).

Utah-Idaho Sugar Co. v. Lewis

95 Or. 224 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1920

It has been held in many cases that under such circumstances the answer aids the complaint and makes it good: Turner v. Corbett, 9 Or. 79 ; Catlin v. Jones, 48 Or. 156 ( 85 Pac. 515 ); Treadgold v. … In the case of Thomsen v.

L. B. Menefee Lumber Co. v. Abrams

138 Or. 263 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1931

Money paid as consideration upon the execution of an instrument of this character becomes the property of the landlord and is not regarded as a deposit: Dutton v. Christie, 63 Wash. 372 ( 115 P. 856 ), and Ramish v. … Brown, Belt and Campbell, JJ., concur. Bean, C. J., and Band, J., dissent. Kelly, J., absent.

Crumbley v. Crumbley

94 Or. 617 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 13, 1920

Rep. 273); Thornton v. Krimbel, 28 Or. 271 ( 42 Pac. 995 ); Cooper v. Thomason, 30 Or. 162 ( 45 Pac. 296 ); Board of Regents v. Hutchinson, 46 Or. 57 ( 78 Pac. 1028 ); McCoy v. … Taylor, 11 Or. 303 ( 8 Pac. 354 ); Adams v. Adams, 12 Or. 176 ( 6 Pac. 677 ); Wheeler v. Wheeler, 18 Or. 261 (24 Pac. 900); Mendelson v. Mendelson, 37 Or. 163 ( 61 Pac. 645 ); Crim v.

Reid v. Wentworth & Irwin, Inc.

157 Or. 626 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 7, 1937

Justice Bailey, there was some evidence tending to show conversion as alleged in the complaint: Reid v. Wentworth & Irwin, 155 Or. 265 ( 63 P. (2d) 210 ). … No title passed to Hazel Turnbow when the executory contract of sale was made, for the simple reason that no delivery was then had: Brown v. Sheedy, 90 Or. 74 (175 P. 613 ).