Case law

Halvorson-Mason Corp. v. Emerick Construction Co.

304 Or. 407 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1987

Board of Trade, 164 Mo App 186, 192, 148 SW 386, 388 (1912). … See also Kreiss v. Hotaling, 96 Cal. 617 , 31 Pac. 740 (1892); Fink v. Fink, 8 Iowa 312 (1859). But cf. Bureker v. Jefferson County, 201 Iowa 251 , 207 N.W. 115 (1926).

Gordon v. Curtis Bros.

119 Or. 55 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 7, 1926

Co. v. … Henry, 106 Or. 605, 611 ( 213 Pac. 139 ); Caldwell v. Hoskins, 91 Or. 567, 570 ( 186 Pac. 50 ); Childers v. Brown, 81 Or. 1, 9 ( 158 Pac. 166 , Ann. Cas. 1918D, 170).

Courtney v. Bridal Veil Box Factory

55 Or. 210 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1909

Hallock v. Portland, 8 Or. 29 ; Hicklin v. McClear, 18 Or. 137 ( 22 Pac. 1057 ) ; Hughes v. Holman, 23 Or. 481 ( 32 Pac. 298 ) ; Liebe v. Nicolai, 30 Or. 364 ( 48 Pac. 172 .) 2. … Anybody with skill enough to saw, dress and match boards could construct a box such as plaintiff ordered of defendant.

Barrett v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.

361 Or. 115 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 2, 2017

(Quoting Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 US 915, 924 , 131 S Ct 2846 , 180 L Ed 2d 796 (2011).) On review, plaintiff adds a third argument. … See, e.g., Brown v. Lockheed Martin Corp., 814 F3d 619 (2d Cir 2016); Kipp v. Ski Enterprise Corp., 783 F3d 695, 698-99 (7th Cir 2015); Martinez v. Aero Caribbean, 764 F3d 1062, 1070 (9th Cir 2014). III.

Steenson v. Robinson

236 Or. 414 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1964

Dressler v. Isaacs et al., 218 Or 128 , 323 P2d 64 (1958). … The’ trial court relied upon Brown v. Wood, 293 *423 Mich 148 , 291 NW 255 , 127 ALR 1436 (1940).

Sabin v. Columbia Fuel Co.

25 Or. 15 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 13, 1893

S. v. Hooe, 3 Cranch, 73 . … Mortg. § 771; Dudley v. Danforth, 61 N. Y. 626 ; First Nat. Bank v. Lowrey, 36 Neb. 290 , 54 N. W. 571 ; Alberger v. White, 117 Mo. 347 , 23 S. W. 92 ; Shelley v. Boothe, 73 Mo. 74 , 39 Am. Rep. 481 ; Pollock v.

State v. Trenary

316 Or. 172 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 6, 1993

See State v. … But see Gildroy v. MVD, 315 Or 617 , 848 P2d 96 (1993); State v. Spencer, 305 Or 59 , 750 P2d 147 (1988); and Moore v.

In Re Estate of Myers

197 Or. 520 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 4, 1953

(Brown v. Basey, 3 Dali. 365; Dwarris on Statutes, 257). … Dixie Meadows Co. v. Kight, 150 Or 395 , 45 P2d 909 ; Bagley v. Bloch, supra, 83 Or 607 ; Northcut v.

Sullivan v. Oregon Railway & Navigation Co.

12 Or. 392 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1885

(L und v. Inhabitants of Tyngsborough, 9 Cush. 41 .) … The rule is very properly stated in Williams v.

Shearer v. Lambert

274 Or. 449 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1976

Handler and Klein, The Defense of Privilege in Defamation Suits Against Government Executive Officials, 74 Harv L Rev 44 (1960). 7 Noble v. … See Barr v. Matteo, 360 US 564 , 79 S Ct 1335 , 3 L ed2d 1434 (1959); Prosser on Torts § 115, p. 784 (4th ed 1971).

Kosydar v. Collins, County Clerk

201 Or. 271 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 5, 1954

Hill et al. v Hartzell, 121 Or 4, 8 , 252 P 552 ; Briggs v. Stevens, supra; Barber v. Johnson, supra. … In Barber v.

Gohres v. Illinois Mining Co.

40 Or. 516 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1902

Co. v. Rose, 114 U. S. 576 (5 Sup. Ct. 1055); Glacier M. S. Min. Co. v. Willis, 127 U. S. 471 (8 Sup. Ct. 1214). 2. Ascribing to Mr. … One Brown was trying at that time to effect a purchase of the claim, with others, and James Stith ivas engaged in bringing about the sale; but *520 in the examination thereof they discovered that it was much larger than Little

Fennell v. Hauser

141 Or. 71 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 14, 1932

*73 BROWN, J. … Const., Art. 7, § 3. *74 See Crawford v. Cobbs and Mitchell Co., 121 Or. 628, 636 ( 253 P. 3 , 257 P. 16 ); Farrin v. State Industrial Accident Commission, 104 Or. 452 ( 205 P. 984 ), and citations.

Elmer v. Oregon Short Line Railroad

162 Or. 616 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 12, 1939

. *618 The south rail of the westbound track and the north rail of the cross-over track form a V-shape. Mr. Elmer’s body was found in this V so formed. … The testimony discloses that the running board and the boiler of the engine obstructs the view of the engineer and fireman for 75 feet in front of their position in the cab of the engine.

Mayer v. First National Bank of Oregon

260 Or. 119 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 29, 1971

In Cooper v. … Alexander v. Young, 65 F2d 752, 757 (10th Cir 1933); Commercial Casualty Ins. Co. v. Board of Com’rs, 215 Ind 440, 19 NE2d 476, 477-478 (1939); Leach v. Commercial Sav.

State v. Jairl

229 Or. 533 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 17, 1962

Powell v. State By and Through Board of Pilot Commissioners, 224 Or 122 , 355 P2d 224 . … Later, in Huffman v. Alexander, 197 Or 283, 326 , 251 P2d 87 , 253 P2d 289 (1952, 1953), we reserved decision as to the effect of ORS 138.050 on our holding in State v. Lewis. Finally, Smallman v.

Bristow v. Jennings

105 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1922

Matney, 60 Mo. 444; Spratt v. Lawson, 176 Mo. 175, 180 ( 75 S. W. 642); Owens v. Andrews, 17 N. M. 597 ( 131 Pac. 1004 , 49 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1072, and note); Alexander on Wills, §§ 826, 828. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

Fay v. Portland

99 Or. 490 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1921

If that document is insufficient, the only remedy for the defendant in the writ in that respect is to move to quash the writ: McCabe-Duprey Tanning Co. v. Eubanks, 57 Or. 44 ( 102 Pac. 795 , 110 Pac. 395 ); Kinney v. … State, 53 Or. 154 ( 99 Pac. 420 ); Reiff v. Portland, 71 Or. 421, 429 ( 141 Pac. 167 , 142 Pac. 827 , L. R. A. 1915D, 772).

Jurgens v. Sheridan

136 Or. 45 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1930

In Application of Bickel, Kemler Lumber Co. v. Naumann, 301 Ill. 484 ( 134 N. … Brown, Rossman and Kelly, JJ., concur.

United Artisans v. Cronise

88 Or. 602 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1918

A. 733); Lahey v. Lahey, 174 N. Y. 146 ( 66 N. E. *607 670 , 95 Am. St. Rep. 554 , 61 L. R. A. 791); Voigt v. Kersten, 164 Ill. 314 ( 45 N. E. 543, 545 ); Marsh v. … For months and sometimes for a year or two she would be with her husband, making a somewhat temporary home with him and boarding at hotels.