Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
8,515 results
1.89s
30 Or. 111 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1896
Hidy, 13 Ohio St. 306 ; White v. Dobson, 17 Gratt. 262 ; Maughlin v. Perry, 35 Md. 352 ; Deichmann v. Deichmann, 49 Mo. 107 ; Lowe v. Harwood, 139 Mass. 133 ( 29 N. E. 538 ); Gray v. Daugherty, 25 Cal. 266 ; Baumann v. … E. 916 ); Brown v. Eaton, 21 Minn. 409 ; Mattocks v. Young, 66 Me. 459 ; Dulin v. Prince, 124 Ill. 76 ( 16 N. E. 242 ); Mansfield v. Hodgdon, 147 Mass. 304 ( 17 N. E. 544 ). 4.
Cited 40 timesPublishedCompton v. Creager Trucking Co., Inc.
282 Or. 521 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 6, 1978
Perry v. Thomas et al., supra at 394. The record is not so clear in the instant case. … Hemstreet v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedCourtney v. Bridal Veil Box Factory
55 Or. 210 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1909
Hallock v. Portland, 8 Or. 29 ; Hicklin v. McClear, 18 Or. 137 ( 22 Pac. 1057 ) ; Hughes v. Holman, 23 Or. 481 ( 32 Pac. 298 ) ; Liebe v. Nicolai, 30 Or. 364 ( 48 Pac. 172 .) 2. … Anybody with skill enough to saw, dress and match boards could construct a box such as plaintiff ordered of defendant.
Cited 12 timesPublished316 Or. 172 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 6, 1993
See State v. … But see Gildroy v. MVD, 315 Or 617 , 848 P2d 96 (1993); State v. Spencer, 305 Or 59 , 750 P2d 147 (1988); and Moore v.
Cited 44 timesPublished53 Or. 370 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 30, 1909
Kadderly v. … Duniway v.
Cited 25 timesPublished210 Or. 459 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1957
As was said in Brown v. Brown, 66 Me 316, 320: “ * * * But the intention of an owner of property in his attempted act of transferring it is not necessarily and always supreme. … Rothney v. Rothney, 41 Cal App2d 566, 107 P2d 294 ; Miller v. Brode, 186 Cal 409, 199 P 531 ; Stone v. Daily, 181 Cal 571, 185 P 665 ; Long v. Ryan, 166 Cal 442, 137 P 29 ; Bury v.
Cited 7 timesPublished92 Or. 566 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 1, 1919
It is laid down in Malheur County v. … See, also, Morris v. Platt, 32 Conn. 75 ; Paxton v. Boyer, 67 Ill. 132 ( 16 Am. Rep. 615 ); Shaw v. Lord, 41 Okl. 347 ( 137 Pac. 885 , Ann. Cas. 1916C, 1147, 50 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1069); Brown v. Kendall, 6 Cush.
Cited 25 timesPublished9 Or. 128 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1881
In support of this, counsel have cited us to the case of Brown v. Brown, 7 Oregon, 285. That was a suit brought to quiet title to certain lands sold by the executors and trustees of Cyrus Olney, deceased. … In Home v.
Cited 40 timesPublished173 Or. 106 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1943
City of Minneapolis, 49 Minn. 148 , 51 N.W. 907 ; Estes v. Agricultural Association, 181 Mich. 71 , 147 N.W. 553 ; Town of East Greenwich v. *112 Gimmons, 84 R.I. 526 , 84 A. 1008 ; Gage v. … In Fall Creek v. Shuman, 55 Ind.
Cited 6 timesPublished222 Or. 533 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1960
Declarations excluded: Alabama Power Co. v. Ray, 249 Ala. 568 , 32 So.2d 219 , syl. 3 (1947) (5 minutes); Everett v. State, 213 Ark. 470 , 210 S.W.2d 918 , syl. 5 (1948) (15 minutes); Brown v. … Peterson v.
Cited 34 timesPublished135 Or. 656 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 17, 1931
While acting within the scope of his authority he has the same protection, against civil liability as other quasi-judicial officers: Watts v. Gerking et al., 111 Or. 654 ( 222 P. 318 , 228 P. 135 , 34 A. L. … J., Belt and Brown, JJ., concur.
Cited 0 timesPublished232 Or. 354 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 10, 1962
California, 314 US 219, 238 , 62 S Ct 280 , 86 L Ed 166 (1941); Chambers v. Florida, 309 US 227, 236-238 , 60 S Ct 472 , 84 L Ed 716 (1940); Brown v. Mississippi, 297 US 278, 285-286 , 56 S Ct 461 , 80 L Ed 682 (1936). … In Culombe v.
Cited 28 timesPublished189 Or. 662 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 3, 1950
The stairs were eight in number, and the tread of each stair was a wooden board 2 inches thick and 8 or 10 inches wide and approximately 2% feet in length. … See Massor v. Yates, 137 Or. 569 , 3 P. (2d) 784 ; Asheim v. Fahey, 170 Or. 330 , 133 P. (2d), 246 , 145 A. L.
Cited 14 timesPublished182 Or. 526 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1948
Craig, 49 Idaho 319 , 288 P. 152 ; Lang v. Siddall, 218 Iowa 263 , 254 N. W. 783 ; Rentschler v. Hall, — Ind. —, 69 N. E. (2d) 619; Nowak v. Joseph, 275 Ky. 470 , *532 121 S. W. (2d) 939 ; Bennett v. Bennett, 92 N. … Cook v. Retzlaff, 163 Or. 683 , 99 P. (2d) 22 ; Davis v.
Cited 6 timesPublished18 Or. 3 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1889
In Frarey v. … (Dugan v. Vattin, 25 Am. Dec. 105 ; Blight v. Banks, 17 Id. 136; Donaldson v. Bank of Cape Fear, 18 Id. 577, and Nantz v. McPherson, 18 Id. 216, held the same doctrine.)
Cited 16 timesPublished220 Or. 256 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1960
In Bliss v. … Western States Finance Co. v. Ruff, 108 Or 442 , 215 P 501 , 216 P 1020 ; Brown v. Sec. Sav. & Trust Co., 140 Or 615 , 14 P2d 1107 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedEpton v. American Mail Line, Ltd.
256 Or. 532 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 23, 1970
Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique, 358 US 625, 628 , 79 S Ct 406 , 3 L ed 2d 550 (1959). In Gutierrez v. … Accordingly, this court is of the opinion that it must hold that when a shipowner accepts cargo on board ship in a faulty or defective container, as in this ease, it assumes responsibility for injury that this may cause to
Cited 1 timesPublished121 Or. 116 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 25, 1927
This opinion cites with approval Buttlar v. Rosenblath, 42 N. J. Eq. 651 ( 59 Am. Rep. 52 , 9 Atl. 695 ), Hiles v. Fisher, above, and Branch v. Polk, above. In Hayes v. … Justice Brown in Klorfine v. Cole et al., ante, p. 76 ( 252 Pac. 708 ), reading thus: “The trial court held that the interest of Ernest L.
Cited 31 timesPublishedBrandtjen & Kluge, Inc. v. Biggs
205 Or. 473 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 26, 1955
However, in Nickum v. … Dibble v. Hodes Co., 132 Or 596 , 277 P 820 , 286 P 554 ; Anderson v. Wallowa National Bank, supra; Schucking v. Young, 78 Or 483 , 153 P 803 ; Browne & Co. v. Sharkey, 58 Or 480 , 115 P 156 ; Lewis V.
Cited 12 timesPublishedBonnevier v. Dairy Cooperative Ass'n
227 Or. 123 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1961
Gaines v. … Hall, 155 S.C. 320 , 152 *137 S.E. 521; McLaurin v. Hamer, 165 S.C. 411 , 164 S.E. 2 ; Seiss v. MeClintic-Marshall Corp., 324 Pa. 201 , 188 A. 109 ; 1 Restatement of the Law, Contracts, § 32.”
Cited 10 timesPublished
Ask Donna