Case law

Hansen v. Malheur County

160 Or. 579 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1938

Board of Sup., 46 Cal. 214 ; Ex parte Covington, 160 Ky. 146 , 169 S. W. 718 ; Helton v. Martin, 141 La. 835 , 75 So. 740 ; Re Com. Council v. Lackawanna, 143 N. Y. S. 198, 158 App. Div. 263 ; Kerlin v. … Bateman v.

Young v. Patton

9 Or. 195 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1881

That under and by virtue of an ordinance of said city of Oakland, adopted by the board of trustees of said city on the 28th day of November, 1878, it was unlawful that any horses or mules should be permitted to be at large … In the State v. Lyons, Coxe; 403, 412, an adjournment was allowed after a case had been partly tried, in order to enable the defendant to obtain a copy, or use a particular document. *199 In Liggett v.

Feig v. Plummer

135 Or. 656 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 17, 1931

While acting within the scope of his authority he has the same protection, against civil liability as other quasi-judicial officers: Watts v. Gerking et al., 111 Or. 654 ( 222 P. 318 , 228 P. 135 , 34 A. L. … J., Belt and Brown, JJ., concur.

State v. Hutchison

222 Or. 533 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1960

Declarations excluded: Alabama Power Co. v. Ray, 249 Ala. 568 , 32 So.2d 219 , syl. 3 (1947) (5 minutes); Everett v. State, 213 Ark. 470 , 210 S.W.2d 918 , syl. 5 (1948) (15 minutes); Brown v. … Peterson v.

1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development Commission

301 Or. 622 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 3, 1986

See e.g., Mullinax v. … See Chisholm v. SAIF, supra.

Shields v. Kudrna

242 Or. 74 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 24, 1965

Wester v. State Land Board et al, 231 Or 405, 408 , 373 P2d 422 (1962), and cases there cited. In any event, the evidence preponderates that the will was drawn exactly as intended by the testator.

Inman v. Brice Realty Co.

204 Or. 215 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1955

This is a companion case to that decided in a separate opinion handed down by this court today: Sorenson v. Brice Realty Company, 204 Or 223 , 282 P2d 1057 . … An agreement was entered into between plaintiff and Inman that they *217 would join in their efforts to close a sale for the two apartment houses, the 50 per cent commission, based on Portland Realty Board rates, and becoming

Ganoe v. Ohmart

121 Or. 116 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 25, 1927

This opinion cites with approval Buttlar v. Rosenblath, 42 N. J. Eq. 651 ( 59 Am. Rep. 52 , 9 Atl. 695 ), Hiles v. Fisher, above, and Branch v. Polk, above. In Hayes v. … Justice Brown in Klorfine v. Cole et al., ante, p. 76 ( 252 Pac. 708 ), reading thus: “The trial court held that the interest of Ernest L.

Latourette v. County Court of Clackamas County

131 Or. 168 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 8, 1929

As stated in Rockhill v. … power to procure right of way for the road either by donation, by purchase or by agreement, and when the title is not acquired by purchase or agreement- with the owners of the land the county court is required to appoint a board

Leibee v. Leibee

220 Or. 256 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1960

In Bliss v. … Western States Finance Co. v. Ruff, 108 Or 442 , 215 P 501 , 216 P 1020 ; Brown v. Sec. Sav. & Trust Co., 140 Or 615 , 14 P2d 1107 .

Gardner v. Dollina & Elliott

206 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 12, 1955

We repeat what was said in Tudor v. … Harrington v. Demaris, 46 Or 111 , 77 P 603 , 82 P 14 ; Cottel v. Berry, 42 Or 593 , 72 P 584 ; Geddis v. Parrish, 1 Wash 587, 21 P 314 ; Burk v. Simonson, 104 Ind 173, 2 NE 309 ; Ford v.

Hanley Co. v. Harney Valley Irr. Dist.

93 Or. 78 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1919

It was held by this court in Rynearson v. … in the Cir *95 cuit Court for the purpose of having a judicial examination and judgment as to the regularity and legality of the proceedings in connection with the organization of a district, and the proceedings of the board

Wood v. Rayburn

18 Or. 3 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1889

In Frarey v. … (Dugan v. Vattin, 25 Am. Dec. 105 ; Blight v. Banks, 17 Id. 136; Donaldson v. Bank of Cape Fear, 18 Id. 577, and Nantz v. McPherson, 18 Id. 216, held the same doctrine.)

Down v. Miller

145 Or. 55 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 7, 1933

The irrigation district and the bond issue involved in this suit are the same as in State ex rel. v. McClain, 132 Or. 561 ( 286 P. 590 ); State ex rel. v. McClain, 136 Or. 53 ( 298 P. 211 ), and State ex rel. v. … In that decision we cited this section of our laws as a complete answer to the statement of the board that the district contained lands with appurtenant water rights.

Cady v. Bay City Land Co.

102 Or. 5 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 11, 1921

The opinion quotes with approval this excerpt from Brown v. Curtiss, 2 N. … S.) 1009); Partridge v. Davis, 20 Vt. 499 ; Donnerberg v. Oppenheimer, 15 Wash. 290 ( 46 Pac. 254 ); National Exchange Bank v. McElfish Clay Mfg. Co., 48 W. Va. 406 ( 37 S. E. 541 ); Robinson v.

Matter of Adoption of Eder

312 Or. 244 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 22, 1991

Attempts through the judicial process to establish visitation have been held to be important, id., as have inquiries made to third parties about a child’s well-being, Brown v. … Threets, supra, 105 Or App at 353-55 ; Brown v. Taylor, supra, 22 Or App at 223 , or where the dissolution judgment did hot provide for visitation, Swarthout v.

Mercer v. Risberg

182 Or. 526 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1948

Craig, 49 Idaho 319 , 288 P. 152 ; Lang v. Siddall, 218 Iowa 263 , 254 N. W. 783 ; Rentschler v. Hall, — Ind. —, 69 N. E. (2d) 619; Nowak v. Joseph, 275 Ky. 470 , *532 121 S. W. (2d) 939 ; Bennett v. Bennett, 92 N. … Cook v. Retzlaff, 163 Or. 683 , 99 P. (2d) 22 ; Davis v.

Brandtjen & Kluge, Inc. v. Biggs

205 Or. 473 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 26, 1955

However, in Nickum v. … Dibble v. Hodes Co., 132 Or 596 , 277 P 820 , 286 P 554 ; Anderson v. Wallowa National Bank, supra; Schucking v. Young, 78 Or 483 , 153 P 803 ; Browne & Co. v. Sharkey, 58 Or 480 , 115 P 156 ; Lewis V.

Carlson v. Oregon Short Line Ry. Co.

21 Or. 453 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1892

Justice Deaby, in Holmes v. O. & C. R. R. … (Ladd v. Foster, 12 Saw. 547 ; S. C. 31 Fed. Rep. 827; Holland v. Brown, 13 Saw. 284 ; S. C. 35 Fed.

Thurman v. Signal Insurance Company

260 Or. 524 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1971

Co. v. Brown, 77 Md 64, 25 A 989, 991-92, 27 A 314 (1893). … Lamb-Weston et al v. Ore. Auto. Ins.