Case law

Multnomah County v. Dant & Russell, Inc.

158 Or. 350 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 25, 1938

Terminal Co. v. … The case, therefore, comes under Coe v.

Pickard v. Marsh

62 Or. 192 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 4, 1912

Board of Commissioners, 63 Kan. 557 : 66 Pac. 635 ), and it is necessary that the appointment shall be indorsed on the writ, as that is a requirement of the statute above quoted (Davis v. Hamilton, 53 Ill. … Co. v. Page, 61 Mich. 72 : 27 N. W. 859 ; Dolan v. Topping, 51 Kan. 321 : 32 Pac. 1120 ). As said in Gordon v. Knapp, 1 Scam.

Seavey v. Green

137 Or. 127 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1931

Kaser, 68 Or. 153 ( 137 P. 187 ); Love v. Walker, 59 Or. 95 ( 115 P. 296 ). The contention is made by appellants that a co-tenant cannot legally convey by metes and bounds a portion of the common property. … J., Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

State Ex Rel. Spencer v. Howe

281 Or. 599 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1978

Cole, 280 Or 173, 177 , 570 P2d 365 (1977); Peterson v. *604 Klamath Falls, 279 Or 249, 257 , 566 P2d 1193 (1977); Dickinson v. Davis, 277 Or 665, 673 , 561 P2d 1019 (1977); Green v. … Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 16.05, at 444 (1958)). 4 See e.g., South of Sunnyside Neighborhood League v. Board of Comm’rs, 280 Or 3, 22-23, 569 P2d 1063 (1977); Peterson v.

Moore v. Moore

231 Or. 302 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1962

Landers, 226 Or 380 , 360 P2d 552 (1961); Secondine v. Secondine, 311 P2d 215 (Okla 1957). See, Burke v. Burke, 216 Or 691 , 340 P2d 948, 951 (1959). ④ See, e.g., Wareham v. … Wareham, — Cal App2d —, 15 Cal Rptr 465 (1961); Mund v. Mund, 252 Minn 442, 90 NW2d 309 (1958).

Rowley v. City of Medford

132 Or. 405 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1930

the 6th day of September, 1915, these plaintiffs and their grantors, under the provisions of their respective permits and applications, and under and pursuant to the laws of Oregon and the requirements of the state water board … Co. v. City of Chicago, 174 Ill. 439 , 51 N. E. 596 ); Reynolds v. Blue, 47 Ala. 711 . The resolution was not a law, was not intended to be such, and was not binding on the city of Medford.

Hughes v. City of Portland

53 Or. 370 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 30, 1909

Kadderly v. … Duniway v.

State v. Lightner

77 Or. 587 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1915

1 of Chapter 127, page 133, General Laws of Oregon, 1915, *588 The commissioners declined to take action, on the ground that that section, as amended by a later act of the same session (Chapter 194, page 255), gives the board … Pittsburg, 91 Kan. 910 ( 139 Pac. 418 ); Columbia Wire Co. v. Boyce, 104 Fed. 172 ( 44 C. C. A. 588 ); Heinze v. Butte, 107 Fed. 165 ( 46 C. C. A. 219 ). In State ex rel. v.

Loe Et Ux v. Lenhard

227 Or. 242 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 17, 1961

Under Martin v. … to be dangerous to persons, plants, or animals, and strictly forbids any sale or use of such chemicals except within the rules and regulations of the plant board.

Carpenter v. Lord

88 Or. 128 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1918

providing the procedure for the organization of corporations are mandatory, but it is held that when the state acquiesces a failure to comply with these requirements will not prevent the organization of a de facto corporation: Brown … v.

Feist v. Sears, Roebuck & Company

267 Or. 402 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1973

Co. v. Moore, 110 Ill. App. 304 . … Senders, 170 Or 457, 461 , 135 P2d 283 (1943); Nielsen v. Brown, 232 Or 426 , 374 P2d 896 (1962); Hale v. Electric Steel Foundry Co., 183 Or 275 , 191 P2d 396 , 192 P2d 257 (1948). See also Figlar v.

State v. Blocker

291 Or. 255 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1981

Board of Dental Examiners, 288 Or 293, 298 , 605 P2d 273 (1980), citing State v. Blair, 287 Or 519 , 601 P2d 766 (1979); State v. … State v. Blair, supra; cf. Lewis v. New Orleans, 415 US 130 , 94 S Ct 970 , 39 L Ed 2d 225 (1973).

McFadden v. Dryvit Systems, Inc.

338 Or. 528 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 26, 2005

In Gladhart v. … In so doing, the board did not adjudicate any issue in the matter other than the claim’s timeliness. The Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of the claim in 1973. See Dahlstrom v.

Howard-Cooper Corp. v. Umpqua Dredging & Construction Co.

148 Or. 582 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 14, 1934

Co. v. United States Shipping Board E. F. Corp., 7 Fed. (2d) 565; Marsh Wood Products Co. v. Babcock & Wilcox Co., 207 Wis. 209, 224, 225 ( 240 N. W. 392, 398, 399 ). … Wells v. Applegate, 12 Or. 208 ( 6 P. 770 ); Everding & Farrell v. Gebhardt Lumber Co., 86 Or. 239 ( 168 P. 304 ); Clevenger v. Smith, 126 Or. 384 ( 270 P. 501 ).

Johnson v. Los Angeles-Seattle Motor Express, Inc.

222 Or. 377 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 8, 1960

In White v. … Harper and James, The Law of Torts (Little, Brown & Co., Boston, 1956) § 23.6, 1273-1277.

Pacific Elevator Co. v. Portland

65 Or. 349 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1913

Thus in Ward v. … Co. v. State Land Board, 56 Or. 157, 161 ( 108 Pac. 126 ); Fowler v. Wood, 73 Kan. 511, 549 ( 85 Pac. 763 , 6 L. R. A. (N. S.) 162, 117 Am. St. Rep. 534 ).

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Huffman

331 Or. 209 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 26, 2000

*211 PER CURIAM In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, a trial panel of the Disciplinary Board found that the accused violated DR 1-102(A)(3) (prohibiting conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation … See Huffman v. Leon De Mendoza, 135 Or App 680, 682-84 , 899 P2d 734 (1995) (setting out facts of that action). The accused did not include the $100 filing fee with his notice of appeal.

Clark v. Jones

173 Or. 106 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1943

City of Minneapolis, 49 Minn. 148 , 51 N.W. 907 ; Estes v. Agricultural Association, 181 Mich. 71 , 147 N.W. 553 ; Town of East Greenwich v. *112 Gimmons, 84 R.I. 526 , 84 A. 1008 ; Gage v. … In Fall Creek v. Shuman, 55 Ind.

Davis v. O'BRIEN

320 Or. 729 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 6, 1995

Plaintiff relied on this court’s decision in Mills v. Brown, 303 Or 223 , 735 P2d 603 (1987). … See Stephens v.

In re Thompson

325 Or. 467 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 18, 1997

See Crow v. Abraham, 86 Or 99 , 167 P 590 (1917) and Haney v. Neace-Stark Co., 109 Or 93 , 216 P 757 , 219 P 190 (1923) defining judgments ‘on the merits.’ … State v. Hilborn, 299 Or 608, 611 , 705 P2d 192 (1985).