Case law

Burgess v. Charles A. Wing Agency, Inc.

139 Or. 614 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 27, 1932

W. 337 ); Cox v. Haun, 127 Ind. 325 ( 26 N. E. 822 ); *624 Frazier v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 51 S. D. 40 ( 211 N. W. 973 ); and Bell v. McConnell, 37 Ohio St. 306 ( 41 Am. Rep. 528 ). … Invited error is never a ground for a reversal: Brown v. Jones, 137 Or. 520 ( 3 P. (2d) 768 ). Moreover, no offer of proof of the character suggested by section 2-704, Oregon Code 1930, was supplied.

McFadden v. Dryvit Systems, Inc.

338 Or. 528 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 26, 2005

In Gladhart v. … In so doing, the board did not adjudicate any issue in the matter other than the claim’s timeliness. The Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of the claim in 1973. See Dahlstrom v.

Hogan v. Aluminum Lock Shingle Corp.

214 Or. 218 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 6, 1958

Snow v. Tompkins, supra, at p 63. … Also see Night Commander Lighting Co. v. Brown, 213 Mich 214 , 181 NW 979, 980 , and J. B. Colt Co. v. Elam, 138 Va 124, 120 SE 857, 858 , wherein the facts closely proximate those found in the instant matter.

Rowley v. City of Medford

132 Or. 405 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1930

the 6th day of September, 1915, these plaintiffs and their grantors, under the provisions of their respective permits and applications, and under and pursuant to the laws of Oregon and the requirements of the state water board … Co. v. City of Chicago, 174 Ill. 439 , 51 N. E. 596 ); Reynolds v. Blue, 47 Ala. 711 . The resolution was not a law, was not intended to be such, and was not binding on the city of Medford.

Jarvill v. City of Eugene

289 Or. 157 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 28, 1980

See Report of Board of State Tax Commissioners 15-16 (1911). Cf. Township of Pine Grove v. Talcott, 86 US (19 Wall) 666, 22 L Ed 227 (1873). … County of Multnomah, 6 Or 62 (1876); Board of Comm’rs of Jackson County v. State ex rel Shields, 155 Ind 604, 58 NE 1037 (1900); Watkins v. Barrow, 121 Va 236, 92 SE 908 (1917); Day v.

Swanson v. Rosenblum

Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 9, 2017

Kain/Waller v. Myers, 337 Or 36, 41, 93 P3d 62 (2004). … See Kain v.

Howard-Cooper Corp. v. Umpqua Dredging & Construction Co.

148 Or. 582 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 14, 1934

Co. v. United States Shipping Board E. F. Corp., 7 Fed. (2d) 565; Marsh Wood Products Co. v. Babcock & Wilcox Co., 207 Wis. 209, 224, 225 ( 240 N. W. 392, 398, 399 ). … Wells v. Applegate, 12 Or. 208 ( 6 P. 770 ); Everding & Farrell v. Gebhardt Lumber Co., 86 Or. 239 ( 168 P. 304 ); Clevenger v. Smith, 126 Or. 384 ( 270 P. 501 ).

Belmont v. Black

218 Or. 514 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 12, 1959

Bryant et al v. Brown, 151 Miss 398, 118 So 184, 60 ALR 1325 . … Gamp W.O.W. v. Cole, 124 Miss 299, 86 So 802; Jones v. Mangan, 151 Wisc 215, 138 NW 618 ; Golden v. United States, 91 FSup 950); a compensation act (Faber v.

Ryan v. Robert Ryan Hotels, Inc.

198 Or. 133 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1953

Jessie Titus, $6,699.69; Jean Eyan, $26,699.69; * * V’ The amount of $6,699 each was claimed to represent the interests of Mrs. … Hansen v. Hayes, 175 Or 358 , 154 P2d 202 ; Taylor v. Taylor, 54 Or 560, 582 , 103 P 524 . We are of the opinion that these living expenses were properly chargeable against plaintiff.

Lewis v. First National Bank

46 Or. 182 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 28, 1904

In Falco v. … The cases cited in support of the waiver insisted upon are Brown v. Farmers’ Bank, 6 Bush (Ky.), 198 , and Russell v. Owen, 61 Mo. 185 .

Nusshold v. Kruschke

176 Or. 697 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 29, 1945

But it is clear under State Land Board v. Estate of John Gralewshi, ante p. 448, 159 P. (2d) 211 , decided May 22, 1945, that he did not have that right.

Fellman v. Tidewater Mill Co.

78 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1915

Henneman, 36 Or. 575 ( 60 Pac. 12 ); Benson v. Keller, 37 Or. 120 ( 60 Pac. 918 ); Wollenberg v. Rose, 41 Or. 314 ( 68 Pac. 804 ); McMahan v. Whelan, 44 Or. 402 ( 75 Pac. 715 ); Livesley v. … In Hill v.

Feist v. Sears, Roebuck & Company

267 Or. 402 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1973

Co. v. Moore, 110 Ill. App. 304 . … Senders, 170 Or 457, 461 , 135 P2d 283 (1943); Nielsen v. Brown, 232 Or 426 , 374 P2d 896 (1962); Hale v. Electric Steel Foundry Co., 183 Or 275 , 191 P2d 396 , 192 P2d 257 (1948). See also Figlar v.

State v. McLennan

82 Or. 621 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1917

The case is not like that of State v. Aiken, 41 Or. 294 ( 69 Pac. 683 ). … What is here written on this point is not in conflict with State v. Brown, 28 Or. 147, 163 ( 41 Pac. 1042 ); Coos Bay R. R. Co. v. Siglin, 34 Or. 80, 84 ( 53 Pac. 504 ), and Smitson v.

Davis v. Chamberlain

51 Or. 304 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 8, 1908

It is said, in Williams v. … Schaffer, 24 Or. 239 ( 33 Pac. 678 ); North Powder Co. v. Coughanour, 34 Or. 9 ( 54 Pac. 223 ); Brown v. Baker, 39 Or. 70 ( 65 Pac. 799 , 66 Pac. 193 ). 4.

Bennett v. Young

119 Or. 351 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 13, 1926

The objection that the assessments were not made according to benefits does not go to the jurisdiction of the city to make the improvements: Houck v. City of Roseburg, 56 Or. 238 ( 108 Pac. 186 ); Wingate v. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

State v. Odoms

313 Or. 76 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1992

See State v. Isom, 306 Or 587, 591-92 , 761 P2d 524 (1988) (same); State v. Milbradt, 305 Or 621, 629 , 756 P2d 620 (1988) (same); State v. Brown, 297 Or 404, 443 , 687 P2d 751 (1984) (same); see also Powers v. … See Washington v.

Douglas County Road Co. v. County of Douglas

5 Or. 406 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1875

It is true his honor, Justice McArthur, in his opinion in the case of The Canyonville & Galesville Road Co. v. … They are in substance these: The County Court of Douglas County, in term time, sitting as a Board for the transaction of county business, on the 10th day of April, 1874, entered into an agreement or contract with the Douglas

Gallagher v. Portland Traction Co.

181 Or. 385 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 28, 1947

In Natwick v. … Marx v. Parks (Mo.), 39 S. W. (2d) 570 ; Meiselman v. Crown Heights Hospital, 285 N. Y. 389 , 34 N. E. (2d) 367; Claffey v. Fenelon, 263 Mass. 427 , 161 N. E. 616 . As said in American Oil etc. Co. v.

Baker v. Keisling

312 Or. 385 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1991

See ORS 250.085(2) (elector who timely submits written comments to Secretary of State on draft ballot title may petition this court seeking different title); Brown v. … See Aughenbaugh v.